@UnleashYourLife Her happiness = kids happiness. And the worst part is they truly believe it. Solipcism is savage when it wants to be. Her children are literally an extension of her own ego.
Which sucks because all those kids are not setpieces, they grow up and end up here angry at women...
@Rian_stone That's not even that bad. Try understanding a woman who's willing to risk a "happy" marriage with a successful guy (rich, good looking), with a ten year old child none the less, for a simple fuck - well a good one as she keeps coming back. Practically presented herself on a silver platter too.
What I find baffling, is how she's more concerned about her son learning about today's teenage degeneracy and swear words, than over the fact that she's fucking another man. The moral hypocrisy doesn't even register.
@tb87670 When did they say that they want traditional men? It's always been "good" men, and even they themselves can't define what a "good" man is, mostly because they can always change the definition depending on their circumstances, their mood and their maturity stage. A 20 year old hoe you were attracted to is a vastly different deal when she reaches 30 or even 40 for that matter.
A "good" man that suits them when they're bored, is extremely different deal than a "good" man that suits them when they want families, yet they expect a man to be able to effortlessly fill both roles, in fact any role she so desires. So reality is, they want "utopian perfections", who will suit them perfectly at their respective maturity stages; Alpha of 20s, into Greater Beta of 30s (when children are in picture usually) and either fullblown beta by 40s or a return to Alpha mode again (cougar phase).
Not counting aware individuals - or psychopaths for that matter, very few men can perform efficiently at all stages, which is why I believe divorce is so prevalent. Of course there are tons of other factors, but I can't be arsed to write a social commentary.Read More
@UnleashYourLife Best I can suss out is that procreating is pretty much the ultimate act of manhood for him. Ideally, you want that happy family with a respectful wife, but if you don't have that, being a married red pill poster who hates his wife but is still married with kids probably comes second. And getting divorce-raped, but at least you ended up procreating which is totally worth half your stuff and 1500 bucks a month in child support for the next 15 years, comes third, because procreating is worth any price.
But not procreating? Totally worthless existence. Whether you're still having sex for fun, or whether you're an incel that the women don't want, either way, you're worthless.
And if on top of that, if you think bad things about women, that's going to ruin you for life and keep you from ever finding a good one or finding meaning in life.
Because as we all know, the only meaning in life is marriage and procreation.Read More
@UnleashYourLife he's to busy playing intellectual to have anything worthwhile to say.
Meanwhile I did a 2 hour cast this morning on archwinger, and got more people to read up on game and how it can apply to skills outside their love life.
According to this, no one can agree with anyone in part of in whole without being a disciple. It's the same language Anthony uses while unironically calling himself the president of the manosphere.
"Mostly because every woman is not a ho on the right day and NAWALT" is such a horrible statement, I chose to re frame it as "50% of the time women are good", since you know, we can have right days and wrong days, good days and bad days etc. Still I digress, it's not the point of the discussion.
To return to my previous point, you had a golden opportunity to expand upon your bullet points in a way that makes your potential readers curious, after all, you deliberately advertised your book here. And yet, you did so in such a horrible way, that I'm pretty sure that it turned some people off. On top of that, when people questioned your thoughts, you started talking nonsense. Instead of providing weak argumentation or telling people to simply "read the book", why not make the make them curious? Couple of thought provoking hooks go a long way dude.
What do you think works better? Saying that "...........Rollo is not being nuanced" (Rollo bad), or "I believe that Rollo and Donovan are wrong because this, that and many other points I make in my book". This leaves enough room for the potential reader to not agree with you, but still wonder if you maybe have other good points that make your case. It's not hard, and it paints you as a genuine guy.
So yea, weak and or lazy argumentation, bullet points, 99 pages, horrible way of marketing yourself to potential readers and slandering of others. I'm sorry man, but that comes to me, and probably many others here, as a pathetic attempt to get some monetary value out of chumps. I personally have way to much respect for this space to let it slide.Read More