@Typo-MAGAshiv

From "About" section (emphasis mine):

In response to r/niceguys, this sub is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.

From "understanding our theme":

Our central theme is exposing women who seek Good Men for commitment and financial stability after dating jerks, riding the cock carousel, and who likely have children they want provided for.

This is called a dual-mating strategy, aka Alpha Fucks/Beta Bucks. This strategy of dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is not only planned by many women, but it's encouraged by feminists.

While this girl has her own set of problems, as we've been discussing here, she does not fit the theme.

The top comment in reddit is:

Ehhhhh.... This one seems a little harsh here. I mean, she's worked hard and is even a virgin. I get that having never really engaged with men in her teens are early twenties and she then experiences online dating; it's probably quite disheartening for her.

The guy who informed her about caereers not mattering is correct though, as we have seen multiple times on this forum.

I actually sympathise with her a bit.

Intention to commit a crime is not the same as committing the crime. We showcase the latter and my point is that she falls under the former category. If it can be proven that she does fall under the second category, we can showcase her in the sub.

@moorekom even though she is (supposedly) a virgin who has never even been on a date, she fits both rule 5 and the "strong, independent woman" flair.

Rule 5 in its entirety, with the words/clauses relevant to the OP in bold:

Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy".

They don't have to be promiscuous; the word "or" is the coordinating conjunction of the second half of rule 5, not "and". They also don't have to have kids, for example.

Anyone saying we're being unduly harsh has their White Knight instinct kicking in, just like when @loneliness-inc originally posted his first post featuring Dr. Macavoy (weird - my sticky comment is still stickied but isn't at the top).

@Typo-MAGAshiv

Typo,

Let's recap for a minute:

1. She has not had any relationship.

2. She has not had any sex (so she says).

3. She has been spending her time productively becoming a doctor (which reduces her dating options considerably).

4. She is 25, which in my personal opinion is the peak marriageable age for a woman.

Now for the cons:

1. She wants to be "wooed".

2. She wants to "wooed" in the online dating market, which is a meat market.

3. She is complaining about being treated like a piece of meat even though she gets a lot of attention (so she says).

4. For a supposed "good" girl, she is just asking for permission to be a whore.

To conclude: she is expecting way too much, is being run over by her sisterhood which is way more sluttier, is possibly not good looking enough, is being tempted to become a slut, will possibly become one and end up asking the big question. Yes, she is entitled, but she has not crossed the Rubicon yet.

We don't have enough information to showcase her in our subs. If we had more background info via her subsequent comments or posts, she might fit. As it is, I do not think she fits.

Also, Kevin wrote this about SIW (emphasis mine):

She spends her prime years chasing degrees and careers while riding the carousel, then comes onto the dating market post-wall expecting men in the top 20% to commit to her long term. And she's not looking for just "a man with a job and goals". Because of women's hypergamous nature, the SIW wants a man with a greater income and education than she has, which allows her to use his money to support her debts stemming from her degree, 4-bedroom house and luxury car. So only handsome doctors, lawyers and business owners may apply, regardless if she's post-wall with kids.

PS: Sympathetic comments were in reddit. The top comment pointed out that she was alright and we're being harsh.

cc: @polishknight.