1d ago  The Hub

@Typo-MAGAshiv yeah, sounds a bit sus.

2
1d ago  The Hub

@Lionsmane8

Heard of that.. but I have to admit I am a bit skeptical for the simple reason that those people are more foolish than they let on.

Understandable, which is why I suggested that you keep an eye out for things. Time and patience generally tends to confirm suspicions.

1
1d ago  The Hub
Desperate for a flair

FFS. I should never reply on a phone. Here are some edits.

I would imagine you can do this - however you normally invest, check with them

In other words, check this out through whichever bank or trading platform you use. In OTHER other words, try to search and buy something and see what happens.

EDITED: Since the retarded repeal of the Glass Steagal act in the US by the communists, you can pretty much buy any Financial instrument from any financial firm, just about anywhere. But again, check with your bank.

EDITED: Also not sure about Costco research and let us know what you find - I’m curious too. Your Results may vary

Note: The better autocorrect and autofill have become, the sloppier my typing and texting. NOW my autocorrect is a retarded drunken frat boy who wants to destroy my reputation.

Not that it has all that far to go.

FML.

Read More
1
1d ago  The Hub

@Typo-MAGAshiv

www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtFqb_3Z5-M

that's my go to memory when talking about 'taking gamble'

probably last good thing coming out of BBC, it has it's own slut

youtu.be/9fBJMHxOH0A

1d ago  The Hub
@Butthead

Damn phone fucked up the tag for @mentorpheus

1d ago  The Hub
@Butthead

@redpillschool

My fave was trollop periodical.

That was one of mine.

Some of my other classics were "premature Griswold" for that dude who had his Christmas lights up in October, "scarf-wearing fruitbat" for @Kloi, and "comically serious" for @whisper (who actually turned out to have a sense of humor after all).

I can't remember who I gave it to but a good runner up was Flounces with Wolves.

If memory serves, that went to GI Gape Anus, and @@mentorpheus came up with it.

Hey, ment should be flaired "rawhide" since dogs love chewing on him so much!

3 1
1d ago  The Hub
@Butthead

@Goingthedistance

you changed the story.

No I didn't.

You did.

I just added the missing info that I considered to be not essential to the OP.

...which completely changed the story!

Do girls actually reject guys over their cars? I get looks, height, status, social circle proof etc. But the car?

OK, answer this straight: how much sidebar and Red Pill reading have you actually done?

They reject for the most frivolous, silly reasons. That's part of why you're supposed to learn not to take it personally; most of the time it's just some internal feeling they have which they can't articulate.

Most of the time, whatever "reason" they give you is just bullshit to get you to leave them alone faster.

That's why you don't bother trying to "reason" your way into her pants (aka qualifying); you just move on.

That's also one of the many reasons why you don't go to women for advice on dealing with women.

Read More
1
1d ago  The Hub
@Butthead

@SwarmShawarma yeah, I'm talking more about the drive-by types who only ever look for more duct tape and never bother to fix the root causes of their entirely predictable problems

2
1d ago  The Hub
@Butthead

@SwarmShawarma sometimes you just have to take a gamble

Not everything is knowable in advance

1 2
Load More