Login or Register
TRP.RED: Home | Blogs - Forums.RED: ALL | TheRedPill | RedPillWomen | AskTRP | thankTRP | OffTopic

Red UK

Red UK - Episode #2
Published 02/27/20 by Abaddon [0 Comments]

This is Red UK Episode 2

A few things to make clear at the start of this episode. Red UK is not a channel that will focus itself on the sexual marketplace. The likes of Rollo, Rian Stone and many more have that covered to an impressive degree. The official Red Pill channel is a separate entity, and for that reason I have changed my branding to differentiate the two, though my hope is that we will still work together in the future.

Okay, today I’m going to be fairly general in my analysis of masculinity in the United Kingdom. If we are to establish corrective measures for UK men, first we must diagnose our issues.

So lets start in the world of politics and work our way forward from there. Our political elite have almost memed themselves into the Oxford/Eton category of toffness, especially the Conservative party. And yet! I believe this is what the country wants from our politicians. In an absurdist manner, I believe it to be a punch and Judy show where the actors must used Received Pronunciation otherwise they aren’t quite legit. At the same time, we use this to bash them with our very own sticks. How dare they lord over us with their posh accents and private educations! Salt of the earth MPs are roundly rejected, as we don’t want commoners representing us because that would be *dangerous*!

So where does this cognitive dissonance stem from? Why, where else does cognitive dissonance stem from but feminisation! To hold two thoughts that are counter-intuitive in your mind is a trait that only a woman could nail down and spread to the masses. How is it that we can put the cross in the ballot box for the same people we hold in contempt? Stockholm syndrome, perhaps? Whatever the case may be, the population of the UK happily gives way to a form of masculinity (because that is what it is) that can control the country in a rational and timely manner.

The recent stalemate that Brexit dragged in with it is a lovely example that we can point our fingers at and say without hesitation ‘This is the fault of the feminisation of our country!’ How so I hear you ask? Indecision, apathy, squabbling, contrarianism, denial and refusal. Now, in the interests of batting away the countless arguments people can make because they listened to a short sound bite rather than the whole thing here is a sound bite.

Women didn’t cause Brexit.

Have they gone? Good. The emancipation of women and the subsequent appeal to complete equity across every human living on the face of the earth caused Brexit.

Instead of David Cameron making a strong statement that would be becoming of a natural leader educated within the confines of Eton, what he did was acquiesce to the demands of an effeminate society when they decided they wanted to say something. Again, we have dissonance sticking out like a sore thumb because the voice was always in the hands of the people in the form of voting for competent MEPs, but that’s none of my business.

With this new precedent set, the people realised that if they stamp their feet loud enough then they could get what they wanted outside of general elections in the form of ill planned referendums.

Worse yet, the people that wanted the referendum the most are people most obviously set to decry the gynocentric effeminate culture that’s coming up through our youth. Yet, they happily took advantage of this new wave of entitlement and ran with it.

But I don’t blame them. I blame the elite at the top for bending over to people who knew far less than them. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think Brexit is necessarily a bad thing, but the way in which we got there? The blame is entirely attributed to our feminine culture.

Labours opposition, if it can at all be called that, is another prime example of indecision and lack of credible patriarchal leadership. We don’t look to matriarchs to form our government, that’s just a fact. Maggy Thatcher took on all the credibility of a patriarch during her iron reign over Downing Street and she got her shit done. Theresa May? Well, what the hell was that? She attempted to be authoritarian in her time in office and instead just ended up stunting the ability of her party to do anything of value apart from make austerity worse. So then, why was Jeremy Corbyn so stunted in his opposition to a stunted party of power? Because laughably, in a bid to establish himself within woke culture, he accepted the parasitic bond that is Momentum.

Absorbing all of the gynocentric, effeminate culture you could muster still would not bring you even close to just how devoid of awareness Momentum are. They enshrined themselves as a young group of activists hell bent on establishing socialism into Downing Street. All they actually achieved was the alienation of the true working class and making themselves look like middle class champagne socialists. In their continued path of self destruction they are marching blithely towards a party run by Rebecca Long Bailey, the actual female version of Jeremy Corbyn. Obviously they didn’t look to their immediate right to see how Jo Swinson got on with the Lib Dems.

Oh, and that brings me to the Lib Dems. Once upon a time, this party held themselves up as the moderate right, or maybe left. During 2019 they took on all the people fleeing the sinking Tory ship in a desperate bid to validate their own floundering existence. Little did they know, Johnson was happily letting the Lib Dems absorb their chaff so that when he finally established himself as party leader, his opposition had departed. 4D chess, or something.

So here we are then. In complete tatters but finally moving forwards from the absolute disaster began by people who didn’t realise it was the feminist voices that allowed for the referendum to take place, and then crying Bloody Mary at the same effeminate culture that was trying to get it stopped. Its like watching a snake eat its own tail.

Why is socialism then, synonymous with feminism? The answer is simple. Capitalism has established itself as merely patriarchal in the eyes of its emancipated women. They cannot comprehend of the fact that they too can take advantage of the system because, well, why would they? They want to have the life of a traditional wife, as exposed by the likes of the modern woman tinder bio, and they want to forge a meaningful career, and they want the absolute unequivocal right to have both, no exceptions! Capitalism, however, doesn’t exactly lend itself to such a vision. The rules are established, and the woke culture voices are chipping away at it bit by bit. A not so small amount of these same people have however noticed the socialist blank slate. If they can implement a soft socialism to begin with, then the rules aren’t set - the way is undiscovered! They can enact themselves as feminist pioneers, they can make the rules as they see fit and forge a brave new world!

Luckily for us, we can circle back to dissonance and realise that women will rely on the authority of men to establish this new world (because who would want it otherwise?) and then we can conclude that in such an event, we wouldn’t stand idly by and watch the leopard eat our faces.

Yes, it sucks in the meantime. Yes, listening to liberalised betas harp on about equality of opportunity gets frustrating. But, above all - each man is in control of their own self, and is able to find the resistance to such categorical nonsense in their sense of purpose.

To conclude, this brings me full circle back to Red UK’s mission. I have created Red UK as a lighthouse immune from the shame that woke culture is trying to paint traditional masculinity with. Here, I propose we discuss freely what it is we think of as men. This channel will not bow to the feminine imperative. That being said, this is not a free license to attack women or separate cultures. We are here purely to exemplify our own culture and build a proud foundation for our own masculinity. Any attempts to direct the discussion in this channel towards enmity for others will be removed or banned.

Thanks for listening, see you in episode 3!

[0 Comments]
Red UK - Episode #1
Published 02/23/20 by Abaddon [0 Comments]

So before I dive right in, I want to briefly introduce the channel. The Red Pill UK is specifically designed to reach men living within the United Kingdom, the discussion will be focused on life as a red pilled man in the UK, how men and women interact, politics, money and so forth. Any aspect that the red pill covers and more, but focused directly on the UK. If you live in the United Kingdom, and you’re red pilled, and you believe you have something to contribute to this channel then please, don’t hesitate to get in touch. So, with that - today I want to take a look at meditations by Marcus Aurelius, specifically the end of Book 3 and some pages in Book 4.

I'm reading this on Apple Books, so I won't be able to give you the specific page number but on the ebook version it is page 95 of Book 3, the following passage:

'He bears in mind too the kinship of all rational beings, and that caring for all men is in accordance with man's nature: but that nevertheless he should not hold to the opinions of all, but only of those who live their lives in agreement with nature. He will constantly remind himself what sort of people they are who do not lead such lives - what they are like both at home and abroad, by night and by day, they and the polluting company they keep. So he disregards even the praise of such men - these are people who are not even satisfied with themselves.'

Keeping the parallel between the red pill and Marcus, he notes that we should only hold to the opinions of men whose lives are in agreement with nature. For our sake, nature being the natural state of masculinity. Dominant, strong, commanding and decisive. So for Marcus, the praise of men who do not live by this described nature is to be disregarded, these unnatural men are not even satisfied with themselves.

If we were to bring what Marcus writes here into modernity, we would be able to exemplify what he means by the men we can see within our society. Our culture in the United Kingdom has over a long period crept into a state of catatonic consumption, and this is best witnessed on a Friday night across every city. The most ‘Alpha’ male is unaware of his prowess and success on a profound scale. His brain equates his loud confidence as a success and he employs it again and again, but never understanding the why of his how.

The worst of the ‘Beta’ males won’t even crawl from under their rocks, but will run their mouths about their plight to anyone who will listen. Marcus and the red pill is keenly aware of the state of these men, and thus, recognises that they do not live by nature and should be disregarded as such.

I want to take a short moment to emphasise how important Meditations and Stoicism is to red pilled life. Marcus’ thoughts, so carefully put down in his collection are a gateway for us to broaden our perceptions. Before we can even begin to influence ourselves outwardly, we must first turn inward and perceive who and what we are within the grand scale of the universe, that is to say, insignificant. This insignificance offers us a chance to draw a blank slate and the possibility to create a new purpose. If you’ve got this far and you haven’t read Meditations, I implore you to, as it is one of the first and in my opinion, most important materials provided by the red pill sidebar.

To close on this piece in Book 3, Marcus is quite right to make of how these people behave, and the ‘polluting’ company they keep. For us, the polluting company would be the RadFem Gynocentric white knights, the Momentum that ironically destroyed labour, the TrustAllWomen in the MeToo movement. If we are to move beyond ourselves and be unapologetic in our purpose of recreating ourselves, then we must look at these pollutions of culture and disregard them as fully as Marcus did before us. ‘Your Duty is to stand straight - not held straight.’

Book 3 closes with a succinct message, viewed through the red pill lens and applied therein, requires no further analysis than the reading of the message.

'And if all people mistrust him, for living a simple, decent and cheerful life, he has no quarrel with any of them, and no diversion from the road which leads to the final goal of his life: to this he must come pure, at peace, ready to depart, in unforced harmony with his fate.'

The first passage I want to focus on from Book 4 reads as follows:

'Consider the number of people who spent their lives in enmity, suspicion, hatred, outright war, and were then laid out for burial or reduced to ashes. Stop, then.'

This, here, is a pure message that can be applied in a meta-sense to the red pill itself. A lot of its users have failed to apply the core tenets to their journey, and have therefore taken, or perhaps even lost, control of their enmity, not just for the matrix which we stepped away from, but even to the men who followed after them. They reign over their suspicion and hatred for others and would rather see the red pill in its current form reduced to ashes, rather than create and reform the red pill to its pure vision. Once again, I must point to the fact that Meditations sits prominently within the side bar, accessible to all - and yet the lessons and practices of stoicism go unheeded, even ignored once learnt as superfluous and noisy, before the users flaunt their antagonistic nihilism once more. ‘Rational creatures are born for each other’s sake, that tolerance is a part of justice, that wrongdoing is not deliberate.’ The Red Pill UK is going to be a strong advocate for that message, unmoving in the face of others enmity.

Another important passage in Book 4 covers the aspect of being a ‘good’ man:

'So keep on observing this, as you have started, and in all that you do combine doing it with being a good man, in the specific conception of 'good man'. Preserve this in every sphere of action.'

As he does with the word ‘right’ in clarifying the sense of ‘Just’, the same can be applied to ‘Good’ in the context of man. Modernity in all of its capricious forms would reduce the concept of a ‘Good man’ to an archaic chivalry in which he carries the handbag and holds the door open and tends to the woman every need. This concept of ‘Good’ pervades everything a man applies himself to, and leaves behind the real concept of a good man far behind. A good man, is a just man. A just man is a strong man, a strong man is a firm leader, a firm leader is a patriarch, a patriarch is a good man. A patriarch will attend to his followers in a just manner, their benefit is his benefit, and the benefit of all. This concept and more can be pressed down into the concept of good, but in doing so, the meaning is left to be exploited, morphed and leveraged for the feminine imperative to manipulate and employ to their own benefit. Do not reduce yourself to a puppet under the guise of being a ‘good man’, instead, be good in everything you do. ‘Preserve this in every sphere of action.’ With this frame of mind, you will be better equipped to recreate your masculinity in a proactive and mindful way.

Marcus writes:

'No wandering. In every impulse, give what is right: in every thought, stick to what is certain.'

The wandering mind is plain for us to see when we disengage and let our auto-pilot be exploited, when we binge watch Love Island, when we aggravate ourselves watching BBC News, when we click through Instagram for hours at a time. This wandering is the lowest of impulses, the easiest to exploit. We are and have convinced ourselves that these superfluous moments are the certainty in our lives, and have failed to recognise that these moments have given rise to another certainty just behind our screens - a short, uneventful, unfulfilled and ultimately empty existence. The Red Pill is as guilty of this, the slow drip feed of rage-baiting articles in which what we already know women to be capable of is proven once more. So, we must open our eyes to that despotic certainty and create our own through trial and effort, so that we know with every impulse that what we give is right, and then, we can stick to what is certain.

Marcus ask the question of himself:

'So where should a man direct his endeavour? Here only - a right mind, action for the common good, speech incapable of lies, a disposition to welcome all that happens as necessary, intelligible, flowing from an equally intelligible spring of origin.'

For us, the answer is similar. If we live within our moments, without the temptation of the past or the impatience for the future, we can realise what we might do now that can influence the other. If we set our minds to our right nature, we will see that we are capable of investing our time more accurately to ourselves and that we might speak our minds more clearly. If we remain in our present selves we can see that the events that happen around us are necessary for the strengthening of our disposition, and that they all, as Marcus says with influential clarity ‘flow from an equally intelligible spring of origin.’ …The present.

In the interest of keeping this video short enough to hold your attention, I will wrap the final two passages of interest into this last analysis.

'It is my bad luck that this has happened to me. No, you should rather say: It is my good luck that, although this has happened to me, I can bear it without pain, neither crushed by the present nor fearful of the future.'

This, alone, is my favourite quote from Marcus Aurelius, as it defines everything about stoicism in one moment. It has been a long time since I encountered someone who did not lament their lot in life, and instead presented themselves as someone who has been challenged and tested by their life. Unfortunately, it is now an innate personality trait in the United Kingdom to use your trials as an excuse for why you are behind or falling behind your peers. Everything is something else fault, never their own. It is this lesson that holds the most significance for me, as it was one of the first lessons that really clicked with me when I entered the manosphere. If you can take your trials, whatever they may be, and bear them without pain and move through the present and into the future, you will look back on the past with an ease of self-confidence. Your greatest trials await, and be glad of it.

In hand with that lesson, Marcus closes out Book 4 by saying:

'Always run on the short road: and nature's road is short. Go then for the healthiest in all you say and do. Such a purpose releases a man from the labours of service, from all the need to manage or impress.'

Do not come to the red pill with the idea that you are setting yourself up for others to view. You will poison and expect the wrong ideas. Look at the red pill as a reset button. You have woken up in a new reality, and you are as yet unformed in said world. Here lies your manual, and with it you might walk natures short road, this purpose will release you, as a man, from labours of service, from all need to manage or impress. You are here for yourself, and others will only benefit by proxy of knowing your new self.

In closing, it is hard to overstate the importance to which Meditations can benefit the introduction to The Red Pill. One cannot truly become red pilled until he has imbued and applied the lessons of stoicism to his existence. Through your new ability to manage your ego, and your investment in trivial matters throughout the course of your present, you better equip yourself to distinguish between the importance of matters. Through stoicism, you will find the importance of crafting yourself as an intellectual and physical being. You will accept the ideas handed down through the red pill with a new sense of understanding, and you will take pride in your ability to rise to new heights, you will relish the opportunity to test yourself, and push yourself further than you knew you could go. It all begins now, in the fire of the moment that burns throughout your soul. Stoke the flames and embrace your nature as a man.

I hope you enjoyed the first episode of The Red Pill UK, I wanted to tackle stoicism first and foremost as it is, for me, the precursor for things to come. Of course, these are just a few brief excerpts from a much longer collection of books - but book 4 sticks out to me because Marcus Aurelius writes with more flair and anger within this chapter, he repeats often how short his time is, and makes convictions of how to best move through that short time. Meditations will be the pillar on which I hold The Red Pill UK up moving forwards. I look forward to episode 2, see you then.

[0 Comments]