@Caldero I'd stop talking to you, too. It's the way you communicate. You come across like a woman or an angry male feminist who texts six times in rapid succession as soon as (s)he thinks up something else to add, fantasizing that people are still listening.
You might be right about the actual subject being talked about. In fact, I think you are. But it's a question of -how- you're right. You're right but sound like an emotional girl.
@Caldero You get kind of emotionally invested in your interactions with other users. I mean, some random dude ignores/blocks you on the internet, and you're making a big scene so that every onlooker knows that you're cool and he's a scaredy-cat.
Okay. Let's say that you're cool and he's a scaredy-cat. So what?
One might say that making a big emotional victory parade scene about this content-poor exchange with some random dude on the internet is a little like attention-mongering. I mean, he's not even seeing your posts any more. You're just kinda exploding and word-vomiting about the encounter, clearly emotionally affected by it.
Okay. We get it. You're cool and he's not. You, the word-vomiting, attention-seeking, emotional guy are clearly the alpha in this encounter.
@GayLubeOil That photo is a frighteningly accurate portrayal of many of today's "adult" men. "I'm going to pretend that I'm pretending to ironically be childishly excited about a new video game system in an exaggerated and overblown way to hide the fact that I am actually childishly excited about a new video game system and am not actually pretending at all."
@Legends_of_Men Women aren't conditioned by men. They're conditioned by women.
Women do not think "Oh no! She was slutty and now men won't marry her. I'd better change my ways and be a good girl so I don't end up like her."
Women think, "Those silly insecure men with their sex hang-ups. Now I know what to hide from them when I want to get married."
In 1920, that was harder because there wasn't anonymous sex via Tinder and not as much sex via bars in major urban areas where you'd never see the same person twice. The opportunities were less and the risks higher. You were part of a community, and other women would out you as a slut.
In 2020, not only do we have Tinder and bars in urban areas creating opportunities for sex that will not affect a woman socially, but women cover for each other. Today women will talk shit about other women who aren't slutty. 100 years ago, they were ostracizing women who were sluts.
Women being slutty is a factor of what other women encourage, not how men behave.Read More
American imposes not its system, but its systemlessness, not its obviousness, but its doubt, not its assertion, but its deep internal crisis.
You the perfect postmodern liberal subject whenever confronted with a set of information which could potentially threaten your worldview mix in a whole bunch of random nonsense, confuse yourself and come away learning nothing. It's incredibly frustrating and systemic of your culture.
The American Right Left and Center are all Liberals. Subsidizing poors to keep wages low has been a key feature of Capitalism since the corn laws. Marx writes about it in Das Kapital. Bernie Sanders is not a socialist if he was he would support real socialism in Venezuela.
Next you pull some wierd definition of liberal to confuse yourself bringing up ancient humanity as a Red Herring.
American Individualism is definitely not conservative because Individualism is the disintegration of traditional structures like race religion family and now gender.
There's nothing conservative about an American because an American is a deracinated European with no traditional food culture or music just consumerism and burger buisness interests.
What are American values? Being an obese lesbian in a motorized scooter who falls down and shits Xirself in the soda aisle of Walmart? What are we conserving here exactly? I honestly don't understand how to assimilate into this culture aside from drinking lead paint and becoming a full blown retard.
Let's make a deal. You'll call me sometime and I'll personally undo all of the damage your social science teacher caused you. In exchange you will hang a picture of Vadamir Putin and kiss him on the forehead every morning.Read More
@GayLubeOil Ideally, the American right, center, and left should be named the libertarian, liberal, and socialist movements, respectively. At least from a universal sense, if we use the biblical days and the days of dark age empires as the metric for what's non-liberal. The whole world is liberal compared to ancient humanity because ancient humans had to worry about having enough to eat and not getting killed in war. Being liberal is a luxury of not having to worry about survival. Nobody has time to question the God Emperor's right to rule when he's too busy plowing fields trying desperately to not die.
American individualism is "conservative" because it hearkens back to the values of America from when it was established a mere two and a half centuries ago. A bunch of equalist progressive Christians fled from conservative established Christianity to start a country. So for America, that's their conservative traditional values. Individualism is the traditional conservative core of the USA. So in the eyes of this very young country, that's traditional. While modern progressive socialism is a deviation from what's "conservative" to the USA.Read More
@CainPrice wow it's so crazy for a Russian guy to be a Hardline antiliberal. Every Russian is a Hardline antiliberal because of what they saw take place in the Yeltsin era.
I think the real issue is that you want to read Hypergamistic Hypergamy for another 5 years and any development of themes is alienating to you.
Next if you can't comprehend how someone can go from gender realism over to race realism that verbal IQ has to be pretty average.
@itiswr1tten @itiswr1tten Old GLO was funny as heck. And all about the fitness. I think in one of his old posts when he was first starting out with the Skype thing, he said the guy on the other end was sipping whiskey, trying to have one of those affectations of manhood moments as he conversed with a manosphere guru, and he hung up on the guy because every idiot knows alcohol is the antithesis of getting fit.
I think too much manosphere is bad for guys. They start out normal with decent ideas, then end up going off the deep-end. The unknowns become radical MGOWS or incels. The knowns have crazy transformations, like when Athol Kay went back into the woman-pleasing camp the second he made book money, Heartiste turned racist, Roosh went crazy for Jesus in a Jew-hate Mel Gibson style, most of the MRA knowns burst into tears on camera the second they had a woman pretending to be on their side, Rollo turned incomprehensible in his writing and became a drama queen, the whole convention crowd devolved into dick waving.
I don't know if too much manosphere is making men crazy, or if crazy is actually the right destination. Too many guys who spend too long thinking about this stuff end up radical in very similar ways. Two ways, really. They enter backslide and become the womanly drama-queens many of them probably used to be, or slide headlong into paranoid conspiracy nutjob alt-right race-war jews-did-it-all weirdness. Stick a guy in the manosphere for too long, and he's going to end up in one of those two places.Read More
@CainPrice it's inevitable that a large community of thinking men moves from talking about symptoms to root causes. I don't think there's is anything strange about that.
However I do know who it would be strange for: a white American Liberal. White American Liberals have been bread for generations to focus only on themselves and be alienated confused workers incapable of organizating themselves into organic hierarchies.
A liberal society is a society dominated by the primacy of the isolated individual, the ideology of progress, the ideology of human rights, the obsession with growth, the disproportionate place of mercantile values, the subjugation of the symbolic imaginary by the axiomatic [principle] of interest.
I think I have of proven to you and everyone here that any thought that isn't Liberal you immediately reject through deliberate self mystification. Nothing against you personally. I dont know you. But you do represent a destinct human type with peculiar properties worthy of study.Read More
@Caldero It's a question of goals. For example, there are these weirdo MGTOW guys out there who are hideously unfuckable both for appearance and social reasons who proudly declare: "What? You only have sex every other day and not twice a day? And your girlfriend is a 7 instead of a 9/10 or 10/10? That's stupid! If you don't have sex twice a day with a harm of 30 plates who are all 9/10 or hotter, who just show up at your house for sex without even having to go out for drinks first because investing anything at all in women is stupid, then you should go MGTOW! Women aren't worth it!"
It's a weird all or nothing mentality. The way I see things, if some unfuckable, stinky fat fuck drops from 300 pounds to 200 pounds, gets a job, moves out of his mom's house, and gets himself a fat girlfriend, that's amazing! Sure, he shouldn't stop working, but holy shit, good for him.
That was the original red pill subreddit. Slightly below average guys who couldn't get laid and needed to be told how to become average or better to become fuckable.
Now, we have some other weird all or nothing thing going on. "What? You get laid, are professionally successful, have cool skills and hobbies, and have turned from an unfuckable antisocial loser into somebody worth a shit? But you don't know about the Jews! And the degenerate society! You haven't overthrown the clown world!" Well...no, but still, if a guy goes from an unfuckable, unemployable, boring-ass loser to a guy who makes money and gets laid, good for him anyway.Read More