@nowiambecomechad1 We had a good conversation with the others and closed the topic. You are pushing the borders of retardation with your posts kid.
I see a troll when I see one. You are just trying to cause a scene by posting stupid shit like this. So gtfo and go troll elsewhere.
@Daily-Prescription When starting a post with a quote, put a line break after the @username otherwise it doesn't format correctly. Deeper in the post quotes should work the way you expect them to.
@-Anteros- for some reason I can't do the quote thing for some reason
@-Anteros- > I'd wager that a white farmer in the times of slavery would come to the same conclusion regarding life in Africa. In either case its an inhumane financial assessment.
Yeah except they were taken away from their families and beaten to their deaths.Totally see that.
@-Anteros- >families getting torn apart by outsourcing practices
Sounds like you're saying Mexicans are stealing our jobs :)
This will sound really radical but in some cases sweatshops aren't that bad. They provide bad living standards but it's still better than what those people had to live with before. In those shithole countries living standards were so bad that things like sweatshops were an opportunity for people to feed themselves.
@assassin I have a feeling you were typing "white power" at the beginning then edited it xD
@-Anteros- >The quora write up addressed the fact that slavery has usually been based across other dimensions than skin color, mainly resource constraints or being a member of an invaded area. These are valid answers to your question.
Agreed.
Its a large topic
Yeah it would take a whole other tribe to do it.
I'd add that the white farmers who accepted black slaves did so on (inhumane) financial terms and not skin color much like outsourcing to Indians today is easily accepted.
That is just unbelievable. The comparison is very bad and no you don't have to exonerate white farmers no one is putting the blame on you so get that out of your subconscious.
One reason they accepted slavery so easily was because they thought of black people as lesser humans. They were more like a commodity. They looked different and people those days weren't as scientifically developed as today.
Read More@redpillschool My position is if we exclude one-on-one situations, black people as a community can't be racist in the way white people could be due to the fact they don't have the tools to oppress white people. Any racist statement they would make would have no affect on the white community.
@Daily-Prescription that's my position. Yours was that the definition excludes some people?
@-Anteros- The articles were really interesting indeed but I realized it was mostly slavs enslaved by other whites and muslims enslaving the christians they could capture.