@redpillschool

The code behind the Matrix is plain to see now. They’re not even hiding it anymore. It used to be wrapped in a thin veil of plausibility, but the powers that be have gotten lazy and now say the quiet part out loud. A Thread

+ Isn't it strange how every independent government made the same move to de-anonymize the internet at the exact same time? You can barely even hear the words "for the children" drip out of their salivating mouths as they immediately crack down on dissent.

+ Companies like google jump at the opportunity to implement ID verify, not only to improve their product (you) to their true customers (advertisers), but also to raise higher barriers that make it harder for competitors to enter the market.

They run when they have cover.

+ Nothing is safe online. Every major service gets hacked. Attaching ID to ideas and speech will absolutely have a chilling effect. Design, not bug.

"Nothing to hide" is the common refrain from first-order-thinkers and undercover operatives. Almost as token of a phrase as "protect the children." Anybody uttering these words plans to take your rights by force.

+ They'll link your viewing habits and online comments to your ID, building a kompromat dossier. They'll hide their sources and use parallel construction to invent pretext for crimes they've already decided you've guilty of.

Free speech as you know it will be effectively dead.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=VdasbLKm4s0

@redpillschool Regulation of the internet has been a very long time coming. Frankly, I'm surprised it had not happened sooner. You're right to identify that ID checks were rolled out in lockstep with globalist message of "protect the children". That is the excuse that keeps on excusing. When polled (with a leading question) the British population supported the OSA. Of course, the question was the wrong one. Today, the government celebrated figures that UK internet traffic to the top porn sites had fallen by almost 1m views (or some such statistic) - which just goes to show the regular ineptitude of those ones enacting the policies, as the traffic is just masked by VPNs. That that should be a revelation to a minister for technology is deeply concerning, but not at all surprising.

So on the one hand we have abject retards pushing failed policy for a poor ideological goal, but then as you say, this rolled out almost globally. I say almost globally because as far as I can tell from my VPN usage, any eastern country does not appear to demand ID verification (yet!). Where do globalist policies get birthed? No, not from the depths of the earth around the base of Isengard, though you would be forgiven for thinking so. Why, Davos of course! And other globalist meet and greets, wine and dines and other lobby groups very much interested in this area of data collection.

We're once again, as we've had many since and probably before 2020, a litmus test for not only the population but our prospective options. Should you take the vaccine upload your ID? Should you vote for the guy saying he'll retract the policy? Can he be trusted or is it another rug pull vying for office. Well, should you fail the litmus test on a personal lesson, you'll be judged accordingly in the not too distant future. Tea, anybody?

So they've come for our internet, as we knew they would - if the UK government line of being predators if you're against it is anything to go by, we're not going back. I would be remiss not to mention the stacking amount of rules on the well-meaning citizen, and the loosening consequences for those not inclined to follow the rules. At some occasion I imagine the scales will tip entirely in incentivising radical disobedience... unless of course you still want to listen to spotify on your commute and watch netflix in your downtime, ah, the allure of comfort and luxuries. While you pay for your shopping, your ID tied to the facial recognition system making sure you don't steal, that shoplifter who just ran out with everything and more is neither recognised nor punished.

It hardly seems fair, right?