Today I read an anxious question from a young fellow who had kissed a highly feminine-looking tranny before he knew about the unpleasant surprise.

He was pretty upset.

The interesting question is "why?". If I watch a movie, and I discover halfway through that it's full of commie propaganda, I turn it off and get on with my day. If I bite into something, and it tastes like mint, or some other vile substance, I spit it out, brush my teeth to get rid of the taste, and get on with my day.

But young bro felt sick. He felt like it meant something about him. Like he had failed at something. Like he had done something so terminally unmasculine that his core values and very identity was called into question.

If the Red Pill is about waking up from our assumptions so we can be free of others' control, then we have to start asking ourselves why we think things.

Why is he thinking that having accidentally kissed a dude is so horrible?

A Roman man wouldn't have thought so. In the ancient world, there was no such thing as "gay". The only thing that mattered was who was on top. If you were pitching, you were masculine, and that was cool, regardless of whether the catcher was a woman, a dude, or a child of either sex.

Romans didn't care who was gay, and not-cared so hard that they actually had no word for it, anymore than we have a special word for dude who prefer fat chicks, or tall ones, or whatever. It was just a matter of taste.

And the Romans weren't exactly pussy little bitches, so what gives? Why was Roman masculinity all cool with this, while Judeo-Christian masculinity reacts to it with shame and guilt and even abject terror?

Why do male Arab friends walk down the street holding hands, while our skin crawls at the very idea?

Simple. Judeo-Christian masculinity is slave masculinity. White Euro-American Tradcon culture may value masculinity, but it does not value it as an end unto itself. Rather, Judeo-Christianity values masculinity only as a means to serving women and the feminine imperative.

Therefore, it defines masculinity as "those aspects of male behaviour which protect and serve women", and its social rules are a mirror of feminine desires.

Chivalrous behaviour towards women, saving it for marriage, strict lifelong monogamy, men bearing total responsibility for protecting and financially supporting women... these are all elements of a woman's ideal sexual fantasy, not a man's. It is a feminine imperative that deems a man to be a boy, not fully grown up, until he marries and takes on the burden of creating and serving a family.

Even the measure a man's masculinity and success is no longer held to be what be builds, or conquers, or achieves, but merely how many women want to fuck him. For the tradcon, feminine approval is not an effect of success, but the very measure of it.

This is why I say that Christian masculinity is slave masculinity. That which creates and preserves an ideal society for women is held to be manly behaviour, and anything which doesn't is held to be weak, perverted, effeminate, or degenerate, if not all of the above.

Tradcon culture defines a man's level of masculinity by how good he is at being a slave.

So where does the gay enter into all of this?

Well, who is it that is harmed by men being gay?

Women, of course. Other dudes kissing dudes neither picks your pocket nor breaks your leg. But faggots are the ultimate Men Going Their Own Way (or, more literally, up the way of other men). They do not protect women, they do not financially support women unless the state robs them to do it, they do not simp for women, they are utterly immune to sexual manipulation by women. Gay men are free.

It's the women who can't stand that. Men who don't give them attention and prezzies and treat them like the special magic unicorns they clearly are? Like... ew, gross!

And that's why you have been trained to be anxious about being or appearing gay. Your whole culture, on the most basic level where it informs your emotions, has been manipulated to serve women. Waking up is hard.

Obviously, this isn't going to make you go out and fuck a dude unless you were already into that.

But what you can do is stop sweating it. If you are able to get laid when and how you want, there is no need to further please or impress women, and no need to break out in cold sweat over whether you broke with their narrative of who you are supposed to be.

Bitches just aren't that important.

Tip Whisper for their post.