@Osiris TL:DR: The decline of aristocracy together with clergy created a fertile ground for the rise of the commercial class, which consequently had a lot of jews. Jews capitalized on their position and acquired even more opportunities/power when that happened.

Why were Jews in the commercial class? Because they weren't the noble blood of aristocracy, nor the right religion to be accepted into clergy, so in a sense the commercial class was the only way for them to pave a decent living.

Another important topic of note is the Jewish way of absorbing talent from other communities through Matrilineality. You marry a Jewish chick, and your kids will be considered jews. Any successful guy can be thus in theory absorbed into the jewish host. This is also somewhat of benefit to the non-jew because unlike most of his native folks, jews are very big on extended families and shit like that, so it opens a similar door for the non-jew guy.

Why is that important? Because once your aristocratic family starts inevitably decline, you can 'preserve' it's power by marrying a jewish women who comes from a family with large monetary resources. They get your name - because wives used to take the family names of their husbands - and you get their monetary power.

@jojojijo333 While thought provoking, a mouse is at the end of the day not a human. There were no mouses that could sit down, think things through, write a book, and by that notion alone lead to extermination of like what? 100-200 million dead?

Nor where there any mouse who could realistically notice patterns and call the ending of that shit-show in advance. They also didn't have a system that dictated continuous populational growth because otherwise that green paper will go 'ta-ta'.

Humans are too complex, which is why I believe it is easier to create an outlet to get rid of that surplus. We had none of that shit after World Wars, and I'm willing to believe that wouldn't have it today either if 20% of our male population would be 6 feet below the earth. Even with today's thot-enabling technology, I just can't see it happening because that's not how supply and demand works.

But then again, this is pointless speculation because I just can't see any conflict that will reduce western male population by 20% coming in the foreseeable future. Quite possible that I'm off the mark on that one though.

@mr_Tobbor In this day and age, it's probably better to hide anger. There are just way to many instances where pro-feminine power structures can swoop in and fuck up your day. I'll say that it is better to "remove" yourself from situations where you have a control over it - read not potential car crashes you gotta stick your ground in those cases. This implies that you have to know your own limits, by which I mean the boiling point where you can no longer ignore it.

Note: assuming you're good at steering social conversations, you should never really be within that boiling point reach unless she absolutely wants to go there.

You should also enforce boundaries. Women, unless crazy, are like politicians. They do not take the entire arm and leg in one go, they nibble at it millimeter by millimeter, calculating (instinctively) if they can push further. At a certain point, if the game is worth it by your own admission, you sometimes need to pick a hill to stand on so that she pulls back and "waits it out" or comes up with other creative ways to nibble at you. The basic principle of a relationship is a struggle for control.

All "good" relationships start with man holding the most cards in that game, a woman wants to get those cards over time, and if you do not know how this shit is done, she will. If you do, she won't, and will thus remain "happy"/content.

The goal if to see this bullshit, and to see this bullshit on a grand scale. Be with enough women and you'll see it, trust me on that one. Assuming of course you bothered paying attention in class.

Don't sell "anger" short however. Women respond very well to fear and implied notion that something which induces fear. Yes, they dislike it on emotional "software" level, but they seem to respond to it quite well on "hardware" notion. For instance, in general women get wet when they get raped. They get docile around men who can without consequences fuck up their shit (drug dealers, men of crime life etc). This is also due to the fact that people in crime deal with individuals differently, in ways where law can't protect women well.

So there's also something "good"/useful in anger - which inspires fear in women. I'm 6'2 and quite fit, and I do notice how when my expression turns stern, their reactions and their looks in the eyes. Try it yourself if you have a frame that can be considered big (big = dangerous).

Good manipulators are good at projecting that fear onto others. The classical story of a battered housewive that gets fucked up by her abusive husband is a case where one is a manipulator while the other is the victim, or a created victim - she was normal but overtime got turned into a victim.

Note: DO.NOT.FUCKING.DO.IT if you're an autistic idiot who does not understand subtext, body language and all the "etiquette". I also do not think that it'll work for 5'5 manlet broskies unless they're jacked like a fucking dwarf or something.

@jojojijo333 She wants the man to control others, and her being able to control him, which is by proxy controlling others. A woman controlling others in the open is a vulnerable thing because a position of leadership implies the risk of being overthrown by the next leader. Wahmen hate risk, so they'll never openly wield the "crown" unless it's deemed "safe" by them.

The problem with this mindset is that it only works as long as you're "valuable" in the eyes of the guy in question. If the guy is getting bombarded by attention from other women, who due to sheer factor of numbers will sooner or later have individuals better than her, she's gonna lose all that power. This is basically a description of dread.

I have problems finding the article that is not locked behind a paywall or some other shit like "registering", got any link?