@jojojijo333 While thought provoking, a mouse is at the end of the day not a human. There were no mouses that could sit down, think things through, write a book, and by that notion alone lead to extermination of like what? 100-200 million dead?
Nor where there any mouse who could realistically notice patterns and call the ending of that shit-show in advance. They also didn't have a system that dictated continuous populational growth because otherwise that green paper will go 'ta-ta'.
Humans are too complex, which is why I believe it is easier to create an outlet to get rid of that surplus. We had none of that shit after World Wars, and I'm willing to believe that wouldn't have it today either if 20% of our male population would be 6 feet below the earth. Even with today's thot-enabling technology, I just can't see it happening because that's not how supply and demand works.
But then again, this is pointless speculation because I just can't see any conflict that will reduce western male population by 20% coming in the foreseeable future. Quite possible that I'm off the mark on that one though.Read More
@jojojijo333 It will explode when West will collectively decide what to do with the excess men. Until then, due to male thirst, men will continue to be at a disadvantage AS A WHOLE. The only way to overcome it is to remove the surplus of men, which is where I tend to scratch my head.
How would one even do it?