There are 4 types of women

1. Those who like you she'll fuck for free. Unless you look like DeCaprio or Brad Pitt, this is unicorn. I would say it doesn't exist or rare. Besides, even Brad Pitt will have to shell lots of money if he knocks up someone. So sex and knocking women up will never be free. Many movie stars are often caught hiring prostitute. They can get someone pretty for free obviously. But if the cost of getting a "free" woman is higher or the quality is lower, then shelling some dough may be preferred.

2. Those you can pay to fuck. These are plenty. Of course, you will need at most 1-10. Depending on how rich you are. What's difficult is filtering them out. There are pretty women that would literally fuck anyone that pay. So there are just too many in this category.

3. Those you can't get even if you pay but want to scam you.

4. Those that are just way out of your reach. Movie star. Jav stars. Super sexy. You can jerk off but too cost ineffective to get. I mean we hold this truth with plenty of evidence that there are "levels". I want to aim at women whose level is higher than I am in beauty but much lower than I am in wealth. It's kind of optimum here. Pretty goddess with money will pick Elon or who knows who anyway.

I guess I am being comprehensive.

Now I need to device a dating strategy that's dominate normal strategy in all 4 cases

First notice that the 1st one is rare. You don't want to aim for someone rare. Why? Because what you get depends on supply and demand. Price favors the rare. You get more cost effective result if you aim for something common.

For example, say you insist that you only want to fuck woman that wants to fuck you without you paying them. Say there are like 5 of them in this world. You got to choose the prettiest among 5 women.

If all 5 are ugly, for example, what next?

That sucks. Many become incels/mtgow, single because of this.

In general, in picking filters, you don't want filters that's too tight. You want to filter women that those most useful for you can pass through and not wasting time and money on those who don't.

Now #2 is fine. Through out history sex is always transactional. Read the bible. Ancient marriage is buying a wife with a cow or something. It's called bride price. You can no longer buy a wife. She can change her mind and leave. It's called humans' right. But you can hire sugar baby.

You can't have literal sex slave (figurative ones can still work) but you can get sex employee.

Employees work better than slaves anyway. That's why Romans use free citizens as ship rowers.

Certain jobs need a little motivation and positive incentives go a long way.

Now women that pass your filter is no longer 5. More like 500, 5 millions. You just need to make sure you don't waste time and money with anyone not close to the best you can get cost effectively.

500 is a lot of number. You can filter for those who you really want. I usually filter based on age, IQ, beauty, and thin body and of course cost effectiveness. Women willing to do fair mutually beneficial transaction is the right personality.

Those who think being paid for sex is some form of patriarchy oppresion that must be illegal and bla bla can fuck some libtard somewhere else.

Then there are women that you can't get even if you pay. Some of those women would still want to scam you. Many will go to dinner to get free dinner. If a sugar baby doesn't want to do video chat, she's most likely ugly or fat.

If sex is not transactional, you can end up spending a lot of money on trying to make her like you and get nothing. You attract scammers.

Many men spend lots of money on women that fuck someone else. I know. I did 6 years ago. That's the time I joined firehouse. I spent money on her and she fuck some white guys for free. My other sugar baby help her scam me out of jealousy. Women are often scammers for many reasons.

Fuck. I don't even understand why people say pimps, johns, and stuffs are coercive or deceptive.

Men are not the one wearing beauty filters and make up and stuffs. Men don't commit maternity fraud you know. Somehow societies love to blame men. Yea. Men are competitive and love any excuse to exterminate each other. Life I guess.

Hell even women that consider your genes may try to scam you as part of shit tests. They won't to know if you're a simp or not.

I think the Jews have a phrase for such shitty situation that hurts their gene pool survival. NEVER AGAIN.

Since then I swear that all sex must be transactional to keep scammy women away and to reward smart pretty women that choose me.

My strategy outperform normal dating strategies in all 4 cases.

@sugardaddy123

Bluepiller typically think that sex shouldn't be transactional.

Redpiller says that women like "alpha men"

Both concentrate a lot on what women like and how to be liked by women.

But being liked by women is just a mean to an end. The end is sex and children right? So why not go all the way there. Instead of thinking how to make women like me, think about how to get sex and knock her up.

What about if 80% of women's choice are not based on how much they like men, but by incentive?

If I can choose any women that I like, I will choose high IQ beautiful porn star. However, those stars are out of my range. There is no way she will allow me to knock her up.

What about if women are like that too. If they can choose guys they like most and that is their SOLE consideration, they will all pick Brad Pitt. There is no way, for most women, to have a guy like Brad Pitt wants to marry her or even pay her.

So, why not just pay?

What about if men wants more than just sex? What about if men wants children from the women? Just offer more money.

Assuming this is legal, would people here do it?

I do it. I now have 3 beautiful children. My women are willing to do sexier things for him. I just pay my sugar babies monthly and pay for reasonable financial support. If they leave I only pay child support, which is cheap.

I am not saying good look, and high IQ doesn't matter. But if we gonna spend money anyway, why not do it in ways that give incentives for women to pick us.

If we get married, for example, women get our money anyway for leaving. That means not paying. You pay her to leave. You don't pay her to have sex with you. And that means huge incentive for her to leave.

Women leave billionaires and got billions of dollars. Women fuck welfare parasites and get rewarded with welfare.

So what about treating women like whores. You want them to do something, say, sex, you pay, for exactly what you want, sex, having children.

cc: @Jocbro @jprdl @Aging-Chad

Bluepiller typically think that sex shouldn't be transactional.

Redpiller says that women like "alpha men"

Both concentrate a lot on what women like and how to be liked by women.

But being liked by women is just a mean to an end. The end is sex and children right? So why not go all the way there. Instead of thinking how to make women like me, think about how to get sex and knock her up.

What about if 80% of women's choice are not based on how much they like men, but by incentive?

If I can choose any women that I like, I will choose high IQ beautiful porn star. However, those stars are out of my range. There is no way she will allow me to knock her up.

What about if women are like that too. If they can choose guys they like most and that is their SOLE consideration, they will all pick Brad Pitt. There is no way, for most women, to have a guy like Brad Pitt wants to marry her or even pay her.

So, why not just pay?

What about if men wants more than just sex? What about if men wants children from the women? Just offer more money.

Assuming this is legal, would people here do it?

I do it. I now have 3 beautiful children. My women are willing to do sexier things for him. I just pay my sugar babies monthly and pay for reasonable financial support. If they leave I only pay child support, which is cheap.

I am not saying good look, and high IQ doesn't matter. But if we gonna spend money anyway, why not do it in ways that give incentives for women to pick us.

If we get married, for example, women get our money anyway for leaving. That means not paying. You pay her to leave. You don't pay her to have sex with you. And that means huge incentive for her to leave.

Women leave billionaires and got billions of dollars. Women fuck welfare parasites and get rewarded with welfare.

So what about treating women like whores. You want them to do something, say, sex, you pay, for exactly what you want, sex, having children.