@sugardaddy123

Bluepiller typically think that sex shouldn't be transactional.

Redpiller says that women like "alpha men"

Both concentrate a lot on what women like and how to be liked by women.

But being liked by women is just a mean to an end. The end is sex and children right? So why not go all the way there. Instead of thinking how to make women like me, think about how to get sex and knock her up.

What about if 80% of women's choice are not based on how much they like men, but by incentive?

If I can choose any women that I like, I will choose high IQ beautiful porn star. However, those stars are out of my range. There is no way she will allow me to knock her up.

What about if women are like that too. If they can choose guys they like most and that is their SOLE consideration, they will all pick Brad Pitt. There is no way, for most women, to have a guy like Brad Pitt wants to marry her or even pay her.

So, why not just pay?

What about if men wants more than just sex? What about if men wants children from the women? Just offer more money.

Assuming this is legal, would people here do it?

I do it. I now have 3 beautiful children. My women are willing to do sexier things for him. I just pay my sugar babies monthly and pay for reasonable financial support. If they leave I only pay child support, which is cheap.

I am not saying good look, and high IQ doesn't matter. But if we gonna spend money anyway, why not do it in ways that give incentives for women to pick us.

If we get married, for example, women get our money anyway for leaving. That means not paying. You pay her to leave. You don't pay her to have sex with you. And that means huge incentive for her to leave.

Women leave billionaires and got billions of dollars. Women fuck welfare parasites and get rewarded with welfare.

So what about treating women like whores. You want them to do something, say, sex, you pay, for exactly what you want, sex, having children.

cc: @Jocbro @jprdl @Aging-Chad

Bluepiller typically think that sex shouldn't be transactional.

Redpiller says that women like "alpha men"

Both concentrate a lot on what women like and how to be liked by women.

But being liked by women is just a mean to an end. The end is sex and children right? So why not go all the way there. Instead of thinking how to make women like me, think about how to get sex and knock her up.

What about if 80% of women's choice are not based on how much they like men, but by incentive?

If I can choose any women that I like, I will choose high IQ beautiful porn star. However, those stars are out of my range. There is no way she will allow me to knock her up.

What about if women are like that too. If they can choose guys they like most and that is their SOLE consideration, they will all pick Brad Pitt. There is no way, for most women, to have a guy like Brad Pitt wants to marry her or even pay her.

So, why not just pay?

What about if men wants more than just sex? What about if men wants children from the women? Just offer more money.

Assuming this is legal, would people here do it?

I do it. I now have 3 beautiful children. My women are willing to do sexier things for him. I just pay my sugar babies monthly and pay for reasonable financial support. If they leave I only pay child support, which is cheap.

I am not saying good look, and high IQ doesn't matter. But if we gonna spend money anyway, why not do it in ways that give incentives for women to pick us.

If we get married, for example, women get our money anyway for leaving. That means not paying. You pay her to leave. You don't pay her to have sex with you. And that means huge incentive for her to leave.

Women leave billionaires and got billions of dollars. Women fuck welfare parasites and get rewarded with welfare.

So what about treating women like whores. You want them to do something, say, sex, you pay, for exactly what you want, sex, having children.