@EldenRing

Should I block chicks who friendzoned me?

I've been blocking chicks who friendzoned me since I've been learning game but I'm not sure if this is the right thing to do or not because some of them weren't bad. For example, 2 of them used to buy me dinner or gifts all the time. Just, no intimacy.

I've been blocking them because I fear that I might get jealous and simp at some point, and ridicule myself but idk if this is an ego thing because those chicks could still be useful as wingmen. Or they might not because they might gossip about how they friendzoned me to other chicks.

And I'm also not telling them anything when I block, so it might seem weird. I could be overthinking things as well. Any insights?

Consider investing into a reliable ready reference you can pick up and study to better prepare yourself for engaging the opposite sex. I'd suggest that you get yourself a copy of Doc Love's "The System: The Dating Dictionary". Doc Love, who until his passing was also known as Tom Hodges, wrote a weekly advice column that's archive is mirrored on several mens focused sites and a podcast. His media is a bit pricey, but it's a solid foundation a guy can branch out from in RP aware circles. I'd suggest you review his advice column to decide if his view on dating and relationships is aligned with what you aspire for yourself. To save yourself a search, give this scribed link a gander to find out if his #book is something you'd like to add to your library. It should also be available on libgen.

@thoughttaken

Giving up long time LTR

Context: 22M, moved several hundred miles away for college and got a good job after graduating recently. Have been with current LTR for 4 years and have a decent relationship. Very low n-count, submissive, cooks, cleans, treats me well. I maintain good frame and am several SMV points above her.

I have recently been considering moving back to my home state later this year to spend more time with family and friends. I enjoy living there much more in comparison, this past year I've been working 60+ hour weeks and hitting the gym hard as there's not much else I enjoy doing here. I feel like I would be giving up a lot of time and experiences staying here the next few years solely because of my LTR. I wouldn't be losing much career-wise. Going forward with the move would mean cutting my current relationship off.

I'm weighing my options and it seems like I'm giving up a great option for LTR and kids/family. That is my ultimate goal, I know this is a long ways off but I don't see myself spinning plates at age 35 and above. No oneitis, I've been with a handful of other girls. It is rare to have a girl with a known history, comes from a good family, and isn't completely brainwashed by the current society.

I'm against marriage for the most part and would only do so if I could protect my assets 100%, i.e. completely separate from the state in a state without common-law. I understand prenups do not work and all the issues surrounding marriage as well. I could certainly find another LTR like this later on and vet her properly, there would be more unknowns though. Looking for some honest input from older members that have seen similar situations play out.

Consider investing into a reliable ready reference you can pick up and study to better prepare yourself for engaging the opposite sex. I'd suggest that you get yourself a copy of Doc Love's "The System: The Dating Dictionary". Doc Love, who until his passing was also known as Tom Hodges, wrote a weekly advice column that's archive is mirrored on several mens focused sites and a podcast. His media is a bit pricey, but it's a solid foundation a guy can branch out from in RP aware circles. I'd suggest you review his advice column to decide if his view on dating and relationships is aligned with what you aspire for yourself. To save yourself a search, give this scribed link a gander to find out if his #book is something you'd like to add to your library. It should also be available on libgen. Best of luck to ya.

@First-light

I think you have put this more concisely than I could have. this is a good comment. If we disregard these guys as "incels" or low value losers then we are ignoring the canary in the coal mine.

The canary dies first because it is weakest. When the canary dies, you know there is a problem. These guys are in the same messed up continuum we are, they are just closer to the fire burning a hole in men's oportunities and happiness today.

Just because the weakest links are breaking does not mean we should not be understanding them or caring about them even if we do not want to emulate them. They have a contribution to make.

Personally I don't really like this praxeology thing anyway. It flies (at least in interpretation) a bit close to "Lived experience" which is a woolly notion the left hides behind for needing special treatment, cancelling and deplatforming people. I want to look for objective measurable reality.

A praxeology studies intentional behaviour (regardless of outcome I might note) and not unconscious and reflexive behaviour. Actually a lot of what we talk about is unintentional and reflexive and where we use intent it is often with the ultimate aim of changing a lived experience to create better reflexive and unintentional behaviour. (like how young men of low status view themselves and interact with women, so they can have more happiness and success).

I am not really happy with the notion of us being a praxeology and would be glad to debate it with anyone who would like.

There is a reality out there. Our aim is to objectively measure it. and act on what we find. If you want to go with "lived experience" I am cool with that so long as every man is a sensor in the array of lived experience. If we don't like how uncalibrated some sensors are, its very hard to say who is right and who is wrong because we all have a subjective assessment of reality.

Sorry to others that is this my only reply to date for a while. Just been a bit busy and its a good topic and deserves a good answer. I just thought Carnold had a good point here that was worth highlighting. These low status men are part of the whole situation and should not be disregarded or silenced because they have not been approved by being worthy of women's love.

"There is no fundamental difference between the godless communist Left-Liberal and the Churchian zionist Right-Conservative, as they accept fundamentally the same precepts and principles and differ only in how those precepts and principles are best applied."

― Voxday, *Source

Live your life, man. That's way more important than us bunch of internet nobodies. Besides, the idea that lack of wealth or status denies males the opportunity to get laid is a comically retarded fallacy. Where there is a will, there is a way.

As far as Elliot Rodger goes, Canaries don't go into coal mines willingly, nor do they arm themselves to murder their closest friends. Just as the media intelligentsia vilified him, so too did many of the manosphere dismiss his kind, which confirmed how dis-genuine and insincere highly visible pro-male personalities have always ever been. It's vastly more cost effective for the agents of the elite to control public sentiment through internet "influencers", than through newspapers, periodicals, tv, radio, or film, and I'm concerned most people are willfully ignorant to this fact.

I've scrutinized enough history to know that when you deny large groups of men the love of community, they'll have nothing to lose should they decide to follow-through and put the community to the torch if only for the sake of feeling some kind of warmth. I find it unsettling is that I understand this is one of many potential outcomes that loom on the horizon and none of them particularly frighten me.

@universitythrowaway

Anyone else feel like they're not made for the 9-5 life?

I'm in my mid 20s in north america now working corporate in the tech field for a few years making between 100 - 200k. The 9 - 5 life bores me. I've been diagnosed with ADHD around a year ago and have been taking meds when I want to focus. It helps. But it still doesn't motivate me to care about the company goals, performance, vision etc. I see my coworkers talking about the company performance every few months and it bores me. I just go to work and do the bare minimum.

Sometimes I find myself catching up on missed work because during work hours I'm thinking about other things. I like creating apps, websites, and other things that I see a direct impact on the community from. I like side hustles. I like socializing and doing my hobbies. I can focus on things I like when I want to solve a problem. I want to build something of my own and not work for someone else.

Anyone else had a similar experience? What did you do?

www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrjylHI-zwU

This is a tiresome non-issue guys constantly feel some need to whine about as if anyone cares.

Shut up, work your job, repay your debts, build up your savings, and maintain a list of the things you actually want to do with your life where you will regularly see it. When you're ready, resign from your job and move on to something else from the position of F.U.

The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics: How Conservatism and Liberalism Evolved Within Humans

Why do people adopt different political ideologies? How can seemingly equal intellects, presented with the same facts and circumstances disagree so vehemently over how society should be structured? What psychological undercurrents guide people to adopt Conservative or Liberal political beliefs, and where did they come from?

The answer lies in a well known concept in biology, termed r/K Selection Theory. r/K Theory examines how all populations tend to adopt one of two psychologies as a means of adapting their behavior to the presence or absence of environmental resources. The two strategies, termed r and K, each correlate perfectly with the psychologies underlying Liberalism and Conservatism.

One strategy, named the r-strategy, imbues those who are programmed with it to be averse to all peer on peer competition, embrace promiscuity, embrace single parenting, and support early onset sexual activity in youth. Obviously, this mirrors the Liberal philosophy’s aversion to individual Darwinian competitions such as capitalism and self defense with firearms, as well as group competitions such as war. Likewise, Liberalism is tolerant of promiscuity, tolerant of single parenting, and more prone to support early sex education for children and the sexualization of cultural influences. Designed to exploit a plethora of resources, one will often find this r-type strategy embodied within prey species, where predation has lowered the population’s numbers, and thereby increased the resources available to it’s individuals.

The other strategy, termed the K-strategy, imbues those who pursue it with a fierce competitiveness, as well as tendencies towards abstinence until monogamy, two-parent parenting, and delaying sexual activity until later in life. Obviously, this mirrors Conservatism’s acceptance of all sorts of competitive social schemes, from free market capitalism, to war, to individuals owning and carrying private weapons for self defense. Conservatives also tend to favor abstinence until monogamy, two parent parenting with an emphasis upon “family values,” and children being shielded from any sexualized stimuli until later in life. This strategy is found most commonly in species which lack predation, and whose population’s have grown to the point individuals must compete with each other for the limited environmental resources that they are rapidly running out of.

Meticulously substantiated with the latest research in fields from neurobiology to human behavioral ecology, this work offers an unprecedented view into not just what governs our political battles, but why these battles have arisen within our species in the first place. From showing how these two strategies adapt in other more complex species in nature, to examining what genetic and neurostructural mechanisms may produce these divergences between individuals, to showing what this theory indicates our future may hold, this work is the most thorough analysis to date of just why we have two political ideologies, why they will never agree, and why we will tend to become even more partisan in the future.

You can find mention of this book on both Youtube, Scribd, and other websites including your preferred pirate media site.

#2017 #TheEvolutionaryPsychologyBehindPolitics #AnonymousConservative #Books #eBooks #Faith #Christianity #World #US #America #Kselection #Good #VS #Evil #rselection #CultureWar #EconomicWar #PsychologicalWarfare #SpiritualWarfare #BiologicalWarfare #BureaucraticWarfare #KineticWarfare #UnrestrictedWarfare #Demoralization #IdeologicalSubversion #Promiscuity #Predditors #Grooming #Homosexuality #SamesexAttracted #Sodomites #Pedophiles #Noncery #Pederasty #Pedophocracy #GenderDysphoria #PopulationControl #Politics #Rightism #Leftism #Conservative #Labour #Liberal #Libertarian #RepublicanParty #DemocraticParty #Uniparty #DualParty #Ideology #Egalitarianism #Atheism #Tribalism #Nationalism #Populism #Marxism #Feminism #Socialism #Fascism #Zionism #Internationalism #Communism #Humanism #Globohomo #Globalism #Paganism #Freemasonry #RabbinicalJudaism #Judeochristianity #Satanism #MentalIllness #MoralIllness

@waybackmachine

My friend simped FOR me, save my plate

For context I've been recently reintroduced to the single life (saving that for another post). And I've been relearning all of this as I've gotten a bit rusty during a very long relationship.

I invited some guys to a party, aswell as a girl I've been seeing (non-excusive). With one guy I shared some details about my dating stuff to give him some examples as he's been single for a long time. I guess that was my biggest mistake.

So first thing we get to the party this guy says "I've heard so much about you" to the girl... I brushed it off and we went on to party. Then he loudly tells me she's so pretty.

At some point I go to the bathroom and I hear him say I'm such a good guy, I care for him and everyone. The girl should get with me and so on....

I take her back home and of notice the whole dynamic changed, she dried up, no more sex. She tells me the guy told me I really really liked her and I think she's extremely pretty. (He was projecting here, I never even said those things. She's cute sure but not the goddess he made her out to be at all) Aswell as details of us meeting...

Later I called my friend and he confirmed all she and he was only trying to help me, wtf. I didn't expect him to be this deep in nice guy land at all.

Guys is this salvageable? She now thinks I'm even worse of a nice guy then he is... I didn't expect a simp titanic event that would ruin my plate. And we're all 30+ ffs.

Obviously I'll keep my mouth shut to everyone and won't bring this dude anymore. I probably made more mistakes here too haha

Consider investing into a reliable ready reference you can pick up and study to better prepare yourself for engaging the opposite sex. I'd suggest that you get yourself a copy of Doc Love's "The System: The Dating Dictionary". Doc Love, who until his passing was also known as Tom Hodges, wrote a weekly advice column that's archive is mirrored on several mens focused sites and a podcast. His media is a bit pricey, but it's a solid foundation a guy can branch out from in RP aware circles. I'd suggest you review his advice column to decide if his view on dating and relationships is aligned with what you aspire for yourself. To save yourself a search, give this scribed link a gander to find out if his #book is something you'd like to add to your library. It should also be available on libgen.

@Machiaspinner

Is it possible to plate o former oneitis(severe) ?

Hello everyone, I'm in a dilemma right now and I'd appreciate some direction.

An ex (a carousel cock rider) was the source of a severe oneitis back in my BP days. I never fucked her , was weak at escalating, swallowed a lot of lies, and she already had massive sexual experience when I met her.

When the oneitis hit rock bottom, I decided to break it off and fully focus on self-development. The breakup wasn't easy, but it paid off. I got back in shape, learned game, improved professionally, and started spinning plates. After that, she tried to get back into my life. I gave her a chance, escalated properly + solid make-out this time, and she showed signs of interest. But when I tried to close, she suddenly said she needed commitment and that she wouldn't fuck until marriage because she was "done having fun" (classic say from a CCR).

I told her I wasn't looking for anything serious. She said she loves me that’s why she wants me to commit ( Best beta she knew , but i changed untill then). I soft-nexted her. Later, she reached out again saying she wanted to travel with me , clearly trying to secure a beta-bux situation: invest resources first, maybe get sex later. I ghosted her. She tried reaching out three times over the following year. No response from me. Now, two years later, she sent me an invitation to her graduation. She's 26 now, so yeah she hit the wall.

Currently, I have one plate and one FWB. I'm wondering whether I should give her a chance, attend the graduation, reopen communication, and plate a former oneitis ( who knew me when i was in my BP days) , or stick to the rule: "don't dig through the trash." Has anyone here successfully plated a former oneitis without falling back into old mental patterns?

Thanks in advance.

That depends on the guy and the sort of relationship the couple had. Unfortunately, neither you, nor the relationship you describe, suggests that's much of a possibility. Though you're free to try your luck.

You're just going to have to accept that she had her chance and blew it. There are more worthwhile things a guy can do with their time and energy than retread old tires.

Study the book. Resume blocking her from your contact points, cut ties with anyone who tries to reintroduce her into your life, and keep moving forward with your life. Let her suffer alone as you find your next cum dumpster elsewhere.

Best of luck to you, regardless of what choice you make.

@Durek_The_Bald

Been checking out some "red pill" content on the internet lately, and this is my verdict of the state of affairs:

Red pill is red pill. But the vast majority of men populating red pill space, or creating content, are not red pill.

If you don't have genuinely enjoyable sexual/romantic relationships with women, you are not red pill.

If your primary emotion with regards to women is one of frustration, and wanting to complain, you are not red pill.

If you aren't at least content with your life, and the role women play in it, you are not red pill.

Why? Because there is no greater indicator of you knowing nothing than your unhappiness and dissatisfaction.

If I wouldn't want to walk in your shoes, your insights and advice mean nothing.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=zE7PKRjrid4

"This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill, the story ends. You wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. Remember, all I'm offering you is the truth, nothing more."

— Morpheus, "The Matrix" (1999)

Many believe that the truth will set them free, and it most certainly can, but this is a change that requires a sacrifice. In this instance, it means the end of seeking comfort in lies. Unfortunately, liars lie, it's what they do, and while the challenge for most is not falling for lies, liars themselves tend to be cunning, abundant, and persistent.

These men having reevaluated their lives through a red pill perspective are grieving the death of the comfort they once felt in the lies they'd been told. The anger they're venting is apart of the grieving process. As long as these men steer clear of drugs and alcohol, they will reach acceptance, and they'll be all the better for it.

Frankly, it's more unsettling to me that you believe yourself to be red pill, yet like a lot of guys don't understand this.