SheLarror1234

2 months ago  The Public Square

@slutmagazine Your not going to find the Testament of ruben unless you read the old testament pseudepigraphal. I explained in messages above about the situation on some of these books. Here is the passage though.~

Testament of Reuben 5:1-6 , 6:1-5 "For women are evil, my children, and by reason of their lacking authority or power over man, they scheme treacherously how they might entice him to themselves by means of their looks. And whomever they cannot enchant by their appearance they conquer by a stratagem. Indeed, the angel of the Lord told me and instructed me that women are more easily overcome by the spirit of promiscuity than are men. They contrive in their hearts against men, then by decking themselves out they lead men's minds astray, by a look they implant their poison, and finally in the act itself they take them captive. For a woman is not able to coerce a man overtly, but by a harlot's manner she accomplishes her villainy. Accordingly, my children, flee from sexual promiscuity, and order your wive s and your daughters not to adorn their heads and their appearances so as to deceive men's sound minds. For every woman who schemes in these ways is destined for eternal punishment. For it was thus that they charmed the Watchers, who were before the Flood. As they continued looking at the women , they were filled with desire for them and perpetrated the act in their minds. Then they were transformed into human males, and while the women were cohabiting with their husbands they appeared to them. Since the women's minds were filled with lust for these apparitions, they gave birth to giants. For the Watchers were disclosed to them as being as high as the heavens. "So guard yourself against sexual promiscuity, and if you want to remain pure in your mind, protect your senses from women. And tell them not to consort with men, so that they too might be pure in their minds. For even recurrent chance meetings—although the impious act itself is not committed—are for these women an incurable disease, but for us they are the plague of Beliar and an eternal disgrace. Because in sexual promiscuity there is a place for neither understanding nor piety, and every passion dwells in its desire. """

For solomon, you can find it in Ecclesiastes. You can also find similar verses all thoughout the bible and apoc like in -Ecclesiasticus 26.

Read More
777 fcks

SheLarror1234

2 months ago  The Public Square

@destraht Spot on deep dive. Idk about the last paragraph though...Im pretty young and would fit that description, but am choosing to lose out. No real reason why, except the fact that i realized too much about the situation. I guess you can say i choose to act on it than ignore. I never really had anything to stand for

1

SheLarror1234

2 months ago  The Public Square

The weirdest thing about makeup is the cognitive dissonance towards it with men. I mean, I've never seen a sentiment amongst men that is in agreeance with makeup. Most men would completely prefer it not. They know why they dont like makeup, but are still deceived to believing its a good think when it is put on.

1 3

Typo-MAGAshiv @Butthead

2 months ago  The Public Square

@SheLarror1234

I tell people to try being celibate completely and then you will see how hard it is

Kek

1

SheLarror1234

2 months ago  The Public Square

@NeoSpartan Its about being 2 faced. The root being deception. And just because we are biologically attracted to it does not make it right. Just because we think its acceptable does not make it acceptable. Its less about the action and more of about the reason behind the action. Also, yes women have been wearing makeup since the beginning but the people who wrote these things and testified against the wickedness also wrote those things during those times. Times that were far more righteous they they are now.

Makeup has always been used to deceive. The same fruit from makeup is also why you see women wear all types of slick thot shit. Same seed, same purpose makeup had back then. A bad thing grows into a worst thing and thats proof its a bad thing altogether.

One may argue and say im tweaking, that makeup and modern day female attire and such is not a bad thing. But keep it should be kept in mind that i am not so agreed. I tell people to try being celibate completely and then you will see how hard it is, and what these things really have done.

Read More
2

SheLarror1234

2 months ago  The Public Square
1

SheLarror1234

2 months ago  The Public Square

@AFTSOV I think its deeper than what we would believe. Redemption, is a walk of life for the most part. Not just some switch that people can switch. Yes everyone can change, but the question is, will they change? Will they hold accountability for their harlotry?

Women do this settle down thing where even though they are ran though and worn out, they still find it acceptable to trap some strange guy in the end. The bible says that the reward for a wicked man is a wicked woman, and even more verses explaining how woman are more subject to the spirit of fornication (testament of rueben), (wisdom of solomon).

So i think the bigger question is what makes women so wicked. The testimony of Redpillers alone would explain that, let alone explain the deception of makeup and other "womenly" things today that are categorized as wicked.

How many women on this planet can testify against their social order? It wont be a lot that will actually fight the good fight, or take accountability for their actions and carry their cross.

A subject far to complicated to explain. Imma just leave this small channel here that explaisn better than i can.

www.bitchute.com/channel/revolutions-for-tomorrow/

Read More
Revolutions For Tomorrow DESTROYINFAKECHRISTIANITY
Donations are highly appreciated for this is my main focus right now supporting all of you! https://cash.app/$FriendOfYasha1 + https://www.paypal.me/staywelltoday View the printable 1-page-long PDF file: https://Ahayah-Truth.com (has download optio… | BitChute
3

SheLarror1234

2 months ago  The Public Square

*66 bible books

1

SheLarror1234

2 months ago  The Public Square

@carnold03 Oh and when i say deleted, i dont mean actually deleted. Thats my fault. I mean "placed in another category away from the 55 books"

I mean, the bible is pretty much ancient Hebrew texts, manuscripts, and books from different authors. Growing up i believed it was all one thing. "the bible" was cannon, and reading something like the apoc, or little genesis just felt non cannon, when this is not the case at all.

Also, to your last question ~ Like i said, I personally believe its mainly part of how i grew up. The bible was the boring-est thing ever when all they are saying is "love your family, honor your parents, by the grace etc". But I knew by observation that something was wrong with the world, wrong with people, and that i needed to learn more, so what was? Who was doing bad or good? Who was this "god" who everyone speaks about? "I needed more content." More cold truths, not philosophies or feel good verses. So many more questions, and any outside thoughts or questions just led to punishment or ostracization. etc. And to this day i am black sheeped by my views on the bible. I mean, in a book that is filled with the psyche of god, firmaments, shapes of the heavens, biblical prophecy's, etc. Youd think that is what the group specialized on. But these are the same people that would call you a conspiracy theory for trying to find out what they should have already been a master at knowing. Looking back even in todays time, it seems like they are focused on teaching the wrong things. You'd think the most important things are of the creator, but no. It was all about the stuff that makes people feel good.

Those other chapters helped me find what i was looking for. Instead of having to read so many esoteric books by modern authors and strange people, realizing what the bible actually was helped me find other authors that teached what i was missing within the same category.

Read More
1

SheLarror1234

2 months ago  The Public Square

@Antelope The main one is the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha.

And personally I grew up in a Christian household, and the amount of hypocritical behavior was insane. Family forcing you to go to dress up for church every Sunday and HOURS long biblestudy on Wednesday in a different language. The churches specifically only reading pauls books, or other content that was obviously intended to invoke agreeability.

I remember one of the first questions i asked my family as a kid. ~How come we go to church on Sunday, when in our calendar, Saturday is the seventh day, and the bible says to rest on the seventh day. How come we have to work on Sunday? I never got a good response or care. Infact, i got the opposite. To put it lightly, This was just the beginning of me understanding social norms and the shallowness of it all, as well as the hypocrisy of the exact people who would claim themselves to be oracles of god.

I ended up leaving the beliefs of the church, knowing how fake it was. And i ended up going through so esoteric beliefs, information, conspiracy's, and eventually made a full circle back to the information presented in the bible. Reading the content from a new perspective, not attached to any social groupthink, i found that the content presented in the book is far from what i originally thought.

I believe that the main bible books in a way are specifically picked and retranslated in a way to make the content misinterpreted. It encourages "philosophies" or Hegelian dialectic. The deleted books, (not exclusively referring to the apoc) proves otherwise. For example, the structure in the content from the author in Maccabees makes it more obvious that it was not written for interpretation, but for historical documentation.

This was just the beginning of my suspicion. So delving into other traditionally removed content like "little genesis" and even the targum Jonathan of some of the other bible books, i realized just how wrong the information contained in the bible is interpreted.

How come they never talked about the firmament, when its literally in the first pages of the bible? What about Enoch, or Esdras? Or the story of life pre-flood. What about how it is explicitly stated in the entire book how sin and transgressions, and how breaking the law is not what is encouraged to do. You'd think its important to know these mystery's first and foremost, but to many, its all about virtue signaling and social order.

Even the change of doctrine from "Saved by grace, were free to sin and do what we want" to after real interpretation ~ "Condemned already, we need to turn back and do what is right".

I know im all over the place, but my change of views probably has something to do with how i was raised. I also witnessed others and know others raised in the same way. Yea the good content is their if you search for it hard enough, but its just not what is taught. @carnold03

Read More
1
Load More