From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs - Marx
Well, he did say this. Unless there’s some obvious nuance that’s passed me by in that statement, I find it utterly reprehensible.
@Desaint Do you have any experience/foundational knowledge on any of those topics? If not, the first thing you need to do is read up on those specific topics. Look for beginner forums that will have the recommended reading material.
For example, I’m learning to write copy, and the first book on the recommended reading list was a book by David Ogilvy. I’m lurking forums and browsing other people’s portfolios to get an idea of what I need to be doing, improving, creating.
Apply that logic to those roles and you’ll be headed in the right direction.
What I will say is, people study those fields for years and then enter a competitive market with that foundation of knowledge as an edge. Best time to start is now, and all that.
Attempting to tell me what "we" are talking about within this thread that I started must be one of the weakest arguments I've seen you make, in any discussion ever.
You didn’t see the last ten times he did this?
Lol.
@Antelope oh, I've been telling tards "capitalism is just a fact of life" for over 25 years now. It falls on deaf ears. Just like there's no getting through to flat earthers, there's rarely any getting through to commies.
However, the "neither has real capitalism" route makes them fume, which is fun.
We should treat it like a mental illness that could be treated
I don’t think it can be treated, at least not in a way that isn’t immoral or outright degenerate in itself. You can’t open the door to ‘treatment’ for one issue without opening all doors to ‘treatments’ for every aberrant behaviour, and then who is appointed the judge of those behaviours?
The best a civilisation can do to prevent degeneracy spreading is to not promote the degeneracy as equal to a healthy human model. Something traditional religious models like Islam and Christianity achieved, but have been chipped away by modern secular ‘progression’.
much like how commies love to say "real communism hasn't been tried yet!", well, neither has real capitalism
You don’t need to make that (shitty) argument. The proof of capitalism surrounds us. The proof of communism played out in the 20th century.
The slag heap of unattended consequences is a separate argument to be made against the evolving mechanisms of capitalism, and only the infantile or lazy start the argument at the efficacy of capitalism as a whole.
@Typo-MAGAshiv AIDS, monkeypox, degenerate and destabilised family units, extremist individualism (that gets absorbed into a collective), parading their degenerate behaviour, forcing their ideology into schooling systems. It’s all so tiresome.