Nevermind, I see that the guy has a pretty good theory about sub surfacing which seems to make sense in part 3.
@carnold03 That's a strange one. To summarize: commanders involved in the incident discarded evidence and suggested mechanical fault, but the results of a diving investigation indicated explosives. It appears to have been covered up, possibly as part of some military operation, not some kind of loose-cannon or terrorist incident.
Any theories?
@Problematic_Browser Maybe we're just blessed with the babes here in Canada and my baseline is off
@fumbor You know, all the red-pill mammalian dynamics aside, I can understand where this desire comes from. And I think it's good to think about the long term seriously. But even if that's your goal, (which as others have said - is doing it on hard mode in the current climate), you won't get there with anger causing you to be tense about everything. Getting over the anger leads you to the first real choice in life: bang a bunch of girls happily as a life-long bachelor, probably no kids, or no kids you're paying for, and you reap the benefits.
Or, you try to make things work, you play it on hard mode and try to wife up some monkey with ho-potential and balance things.
I'm saying this because you really sound a lot like me from maybe 5 years ago. These things take a while, but I'm genuinely way more relaxed basically viewing myself as a monkey in a large zoo who has the option of playing marriage for a few years if it strikes me. Will my female monkey be loyal? Hopefully. But still, if she isn't, I'll just fuck back off to my banana pile and find a new one, it is not that hard.
Sure, sex is sacred - to a degree. This means biological things: STDs are permanent, children are permanent, etc. But also, if you are so wound up that you're going to kill someone because you're not having sex because they're all disgusting sluts, you're doing yourself harm. So I think the middle-path applies here: don't irresponsibly unleash children on the world. Don't spread STDs. But also don't blackpill yourself into oblivion with over-analysis.
Read More@fumbor Here's a mental angle that I find to be helpful, if a bit harsh.
To the degree that you are selecting women out of your mating pool, you are biologically failing. Most women have ho-potential so if you're planning on writing off all women with ho-potential, you're putting yourself in a bad spot from the start.
Chads accept the in-grained ho-potential and just manage it. Different girls have different levels of ho-potential so you have to balance what you can accept with what is offered, but seeking zero-ho is like seeking zero-risk investments.
Same for fat, ugly, etc. Really, most women are fat and ugly? I mean, there are a definitely some percentage, but I have never lived anywhere where most women were unattractive.
My advice: intellectualize less, talk to more girls even if you don't see it working out, keep things casual and low-investment, realize that we all may be killed by a falling piano tomorrow morning.
Another helpful strategy is to look at the man-hating women out there and consider which logical errors they're making. Some women probably have good reason to hate certain specific men, but I don't think it's reasonable to extend that to all men, and in the same way it's not reasonable to extend some women's behavior to all women.
The red-pill community tends to be full of guys who've had some specific bad experiences so it's easy to over-estimate e.g. how bad women are in general if you only read the most angry red-pill posts. But ultimately this is about acceptance of mammalian biology, not ruminating on anger or past offences.
Read More@slutmagazine The hilarious thing about this is that it seems only people who are pretty keyed into alternative sources can see this. I'm sure my own parents read 1984 and I know other university-educated folks who have also read it, but they see no parallel between Trump and the 2-minutes-hate or any other modern goings-on. They just think of 1984 as some literature they read in school.