Greetings fellow agents-provocateur and CIA forum-managers, just catching up here!
In relation to UAP, I'd like to point out:
- Almost everybody discussing them seems to have ties to intelligence
- Side-by-side red and green lights in the distance can look like an orange light
- All the UAP footage is relatively easily reproduced even with very low-cost Chinese drones
- Based on the fact that the drones mostly appear on military bases, I think we can infer that the drones are actually coming from the bases
- Mysteriously, none of the bases have released any high-quality footage of the drones/UAP, despite obviously having high-quality surveillance equipment, yet they make public statements essentially confirming the drone/UAP sightings
Some fighter pilots and navy admirals are claiming, in general, that it's not policy to surprise anyone on training missions with e.g. unexpected phenomena. I find this to be pretty hard to believe. Every training mission is set up to go "according to plan" in the military? Really? If my memory is correct, both David Fravor and Tim Gallaudet have made this claim. This seems to be one of their main arguments against "it isn't ours", and it feels like a flimsy denial.
Why is this happening? It feels mildly blue-beam-ish, but at the same time, it seems weirdly low-effort. I don't actually think airbases are flying around cheap drones in order to convince the public that there's a real alien threat. At most, it feels like muddying the waters in some way.
They're clearly not advanced extraterrestrial craft. Aliens advanced enough to cross the expanse of space would have no reason to be concerned about avoiding collisions with human made aircraft, nor would any nations military allow unauthorized aircraft in their airspace without air authority scheduling and permission. They're most likely all U.S. military drones belonging to either the Air Force, or Space Force, conducting specific drills. Most likely prepping for a potential dirty bomb or chemical weapon situation at military bases, shipping hubs, and airports.
Read MoreGreetings fellow agents-provocateur and CIA forum-managers, just catching up here!
In relation to UAP, I'd like to point out:
Why is this happening? It feels mildly blue-beam-ish, but at the same time, it seems weirdly low-effort. I don't actually think airbases are flying around cheap drones in order to convince the public that there's a real alien threat. At most, it feels like muddying the waters in some way.
Read More@Vermillion-Rx I agree the fentanyl is significant and could be/probably is entirely responsibly for the heart attack
Derek Chauvin doesn't deserve this
Pretty minor compared to war, but imagine being a police officer, arresting a criminal who dies as a result of the arrest, then ending up in prison and being stabbed repeatedly. The world has betrayed him. I just watched the video and it doesn't look like a murder to me. It looks like police doing their best to control someone acting erratically, who seems to keep repeating that he "can't breathe" even when there's nothing constraining his chest or neck.
@destraht Glad to see some people are making property-ownership progress
@firmware_pimp if you find what you seek, do share!
Anybody got working links to pizzagate threads/videos? I've watched some stuff on Podesta previously but it's hard to dig up again using search
Yeah, there are some details to it, and I agree that breeding with a severely inbred mate probably doesn't make sense from a fitness perspective. But still, there is the general tendency that some non-zero distance-from-self is better than continued breeding from within a restricted gene-pool which is basically guaranteed to lead to inbreeding. No, I don't see my relatives exhibiting signs of inbreeding, but I don't plan on testing the waters with the next generation either.
If you reverse the question, why would you want to encourage in-group mating? I don't see the genetic argument for this. I can see certain socio-cultural arguments, but not genetic arguments.
Why are you confusing in-group mating for inbreeding or close-relative pairing?
