Discussion about the 5th gen war
@Typo-MAGAshiv This sounds like the argument with Muslims. The ones you talk to hate the extremists and terrorists yet do nothing to reel them in. In fact many quietly support them. That is the issue, the majority.
If those you know do dislike the bad ones as much as we do (I know a few too) then they wouldn't have a problem with this re-location idea I proposed. American blacks want to keep saying they are African-American and oppressed so that's why they do crime non-stop? Ship them to Africa. Participate in looting and rioting? Ship them to Africa where they can do that 24/7 since it happens daily somewhere over there.
Don't get me wrong, I'll welcome a Candace Owens of Colin Noir any day of the week for a drink. When a co-worker had car issues I had no problem picking him up to clock in and clock out since we had same schedule, only thing we disagreed on was rap music which wasn't going to defile the speakers of my car. And I will never say punish the good ones who do nothing wrong, but we have to get a handle on this problem with the majority of that population. It's literally affecting society to the point that cities have burned.
The idea of exporting crime back to Africa, that place they claim is their "homeland" even if they have never seen it before, that is a good idea. Don't think it will happen, which means a reckoning will happen. Same with the latinos coming illegally. My neighbor is a great self-made type with a mowing business, speaks perfect English and has acclimated to our culture. But people like him will get swept up in any altercation when everyone is tired of illegals sucking up welfare waving the Mexican flag in their lawns on houses our taxes paid for. The bad behavior of the majority is starting to sour everybody else on latinos and blacks (who often hate each other as well) and that will be a bad thing for the decent ones.Read More
Of course the alphabet people are upset: we can't say anything bad about one of them, right? The thing is that Jeffrey Dahmer wasn't just a serial killer who happened to be gay: he was a Gay Serial Killer. The context in which he killed in was unique to that kind of sexual environment.
Think about it: we're (mostly) guys here, and several of us are - quite literally - trained killers who have been to war. How easy would it be for one of us to rack up a body count like Dahmer did, especially considering that he didn't have a huge physical advantage over his victims? It's practically inconceivable, yet he pulled it off because of the FACT that hyper-promiscuity with strange men is a well-known feature of the "gay scene."
Another Dahmer fact is that almost all of his victims were young black men. Racist much? We know that BLM stands for **Black Lives (only) Matter (when the killers are white men)... but apparently white gay men get a pass.
One has to ponder the implications of removing the labels from programming when the people who identify with the designated villain object, though. (That's not to imply that Dahmer wasn't an actual villain.) Do those of us with a MAGA bent get to object when Showtime has no fewer than four unflattering "documentaries" about President Trump and his supporters?
Of course not. It's all about whose ox is getting gored, and although everyone talks a good game with regard to equality, in practice "Some animals are more equal than others."
With the media, as with most theater, nothing is ever quite what it seems. Jefferey Dahmer doesn't strike me as an organic occurrence, or a solo act, and the media hasn't cared about anyone with any sincerity unless it's to provoke a response, but I can see the value in keeping awareness of gay sub-culture from public awareness. However, Jeffery Dahmer's wikipedia only leaves me with questions. The chief-most being, how does a supposed homosexual cannibal manage to avoid acquiring GRIDS/HIV/AIDS during the height of the epidemic, when several of his victims were known prostitutes. Also, why does Ed buck seem to have the same habits?Read More