RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
She may have been still suffering from PPD
No.
1) again, she had been past the post-partum for over a year
2) none of the many health care and mental health professionals she had seen diagnosed her with it, and so l all of them testified in court that she was in control of herself
have not sought help
She sought help and received a ton of it
@Vermillion-Rx Back 40 years ago, I recall them mocking me as a loser not "getting with the times" and "you won't get laid with that attitude!" and one in particular, in the early days of USENET, wound up getting a woman knocked up and paying child-support for a kid he never saw. In other words, they thought they were selling out for a benefit, but instead they just wound up selling out.
Nonetheless, back 40 years ago, being a bluepill beta largely was a 3:2 odds of success: You could get married and had a 2/3 chance of not getting divorce raped AND a 1/2 chance the marriage wouldn't be a miserable "happy wife/happy life!" subjugation. I'd say back in the mid-80's, about 1/2 of blue pill boomers were happy with their lives. That's an utter dart-board statistical guess but let's go with it: Nobody cared about the 1/2 of other men that were shafted by this system. Even the blue pill guys would mock them "hehehe, Who Hurt You? Crawl in a hole and die like a man, loser!" Our society treated, and still treats, its men like disposable trash.
I went into college naive thinking that the left was about "inclusivity" and making the world into a socialist paradise via "taxing the rich" but within a year I realized they were saying I was the rich guy, the oppressor, but also a loser to be tossed out. Basically, a scapegoat.
It was sort of an IQ test to see how long it takes someone to figure out that the blue pill they were taught doesn't jibe with reality.
I remember something similar when we were kids. Does any zoomers now have childhood memories of believing in Santa Claus? Like for real, really thinking that Santa existed? I did and many kids kid from age 5 to about age 9 or so. In my case, I got "red pilled" by older kids not out to help me, but they got to feel better about how they knew something I didn't. They liked crushing kids' dreams. I wonder if zoomers would even think such a thing now that a smartphone will tell them otherwise in a moment.
So anyway, I tried tell my blue pilled friend age 9 about it and he refused to believe me. He had all kinds of rationalizations for Santa Claus such as Jesus giving him eternal life and so forth. I didn't want to crush his dream so I let it go, but I never found out the moment he abandoned the childhood nonsense.
Think about it: It's a fascinating exercise: Parents LIED to their children and told them about, well, a heretical supernatural figure who was like Jesus who rewarded virtuous children and then the kids gradually figured out their parents had told them a white lie.
Shouldn't that have been a life lesson to maybe, well, be a bit more skeptical about social beliefs and trends? That maybe just because all the other kids believe in Santa doesn't make him true and that might apply to other stuff?
Heck, I doubt many other kids I knew ever looked back upon that time and wonder to themselves about it. They just went on with their lives and hoped for the best. I overthink things sometimes.
Read More56m ago 2026-10-03 16:40:26 WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Forum
Tag @vermillion-rx and @polishknight - this should make you two very happy lol
58m ago WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Forum
Updates to posting requirements/rules at WAATGM (forums.red only)
good news, everyone!
Up until now, WAATGM has always been strict in protecting the anonymity of the Carols we post and roast. We're still going to be, but going forward, we're going to loosen up a bit at forums.red only.
Rules 6 & 7, with the relevant portions in bold:
6) No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
7) No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
Most of these rules and our strictness in enforcing them was to keep our subreddit from being banned by the reddit admins. We observed what got /r/TheRedPill quarantined, and what got /r/MGTOW quarantined and later banned, and what got various other communities banned such as /r/The_Donald, /r/FatPeopleHate, /r/TheHonkPill, /r/brapbarn, etc etc banned. We went to great lengths to stay ahead so that we could continue sharing a laugh and helping men unplug.
However, forums.red isn't reddit. Thank God.
For those of you who haven't seen it yet, RPS has enabled X embeds, both at trp.red and at forums.red.
We are going to allow these at WAATGM. As RPS said about the dot reds' content policy in the linked thread above:
as far as i'm concerned embedded tweets are legally the same as posting a link to twitter without the embed. it's hosted by twitter, their problem. If somebody makes a DMCA report we still have a duty to remove the post.
these linked posts must still meet rule 5 for weekdays and rule 9 for weekends.
we still aren't going to allow photos of children's faces to be shown
and again, this change is at WAATGM on forums.red only! On reddit, the old rules still apply.
Read MoreIn our advanced age
Girlie, that's not leverage to argue for getting more freebies, it's quite the opposite. Older women with more baggage are LESS attractive to men, not more. The fact she's financially struggling more than a childless woman does not motivate men to spend more on her, it makes men see her as a worse option.
Pay for her sitter too. How much do you like this girl?
Not much at all if she acts like I'm her personal ATM, that's for sure.
You have kids. They're not mine, so they're baggage.
You're old.
You have tattoos, which suggests bad decision-making.
You seem prone to complaining, which makes you unpleasant.
You act entitled, which makes you insufferable.
Now, instead of acting like you're a treasure to be wined and dined, please explain how you're going to make up for these shortfalls.

