I could make a private tribe free of spergs yeah
For trading the serious notes
I once thought of doing that but never acted on it
Most people could hold a gun with trigger discipline, and I'd rather give an AK to someone with trigger discipline than a BB to someone who is going to shoot at everything without a safety
"What have you read so far? Which entries?"
The reform of that incel mainly, the introduction of course, and so forth. Before that I read segments such as "shit tests 101", "why her stupidity makes a woman divine" and not the whole thing from the beginning. I am being honest.
Sad for the dude that grew "too old". I found his blogspot too the following day and read that too (from the links he listed here and there), the comparison between feminism and religious fundamentalist is truthfully spot-on. Apparently Redpill is ancient.
"Make sure you take some time to digest what you've read; don't just skim your way through for the sake of getting through."
I definitely will, don't worry about. I am actually aiming to in fact effectively sink myself into still concretely comprehend it as a whole and not skim and skip in ADHD fashion through it as I am skipping NPC dialogue (that's akin to lurking), so to in fact most tightly study it to its core.
"Maybe soon, you can start to go well!"
I am going well, you faggot. #YOUDON'TGOWELL-ER
"Also, I suggest going to Rian Stone's YouTube channel and then to his sidebar series playlist. It's a great accompaniment to (but not a replacement for!) the reading. "
Thanks bruh. I'm of the perspective that one must not actually tell goals he hasn't yet achieved as it's actually hindrance and it indulges the mindset into his mind that he has "already achieved it".
I can only tell what I have accomplished so far. Gn
Read MoreThat's why I'm not going to share it with spergs publicly. Retards will blow off their hands with the dynamite
Made me reflect on the time I gave 48 Laws as a gift only to ask about it a month or two later.
I quit reading after the first few laws as I thought that type of behavior was awful and I'm actually appalled that's how you think we should operate.
*So you read it thinking it was a "how to" book on life?
How else am I supposed to read it?
...I don't know maybe as warning that this is how devious people behave.
Given the same powerful information two different individuals would have opposite results.
You're definitely right in not wanting it for people who aren't ready.
Black knighting will never be a public post from me
Anyone capable of it can do it without a guide and has the skills to already
It's not something spergs are ever going to read from me
@Vermillion-Rx Yeah just repost anything of worth and keep the MK Ultra shit behind closed doors.
While the discussion this sparked is decent, it does not meet WAATGM's posting criteria and is therefore removed.
Rule 5:
Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy".
This isn't even close.
Also, we're rarely interested in a man's perspective in the OP. we're after women exposing their nature and the consequences they suffer in their own words.
This topic does seem to be of interest to you, so consider revisiting your comment as well as the article you shared at the TRP forum to compose a text post at the Where All The Good Men Are forum. Just be sure to read the rules there first; they are a bit different from WAATGM (which you still haven't quite gotten the hang of yet!).
CC to all who commented so far: @JudgeSmales, @NotaBene, @SwarmShawarma, @First-light
CC: @moorekom, @woodsmoke, @houseoftolstoy, @Land_of_the_losers, @lurkerhasarisen, @deeplydisturbed, @Impressive-Cricket-8
Read MoreThanks for posting, @Lone_Ranger, but I am removing this for the following reasons:
A) from rule 7:
No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is.
B) rule 5:
Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy".
Yes, Lena Dunham is a fat piece of shit, but this article does not fit.
In fact, your post title is wrong and misleading. She is not "ready for love" or seeking commitment in any way. She has a husband. From the article you linked:
Written with Dunham's husband, musician Luis Felber, Too Much focuses on the evolution of one romantic relationship.
CC to commenters so far: @hhhhdmt, @Overkill_Engine
CC: @moorekom, @woodsmoke, @houseoftolstoy, @Land_of_the_losers, @lurkerhasarisen, @deeplydisturbed, @Impressive-Cricket-8
Read Morewww.youtube.com/watch?v=gtXb2updm3I
Channel helped with my knee.
This vid specifically about lower back.