These Olympiads are individual competitions, but country rankings derive from team totals/averages. Medal cutoffs (gold/silver/bronze) are percentage-based, so absolute numbers vary by year and participation (~80–100+ countries). Both nations punch above their population weight, reflecting strong STEM education pipelines. Results can fluctuate yearly due to team preparation, host factors, or individual talent. The image’s summary is a fair, evidence-based assessment rather than exaggeration. Iran has edged out stronger overall science Olympiad positioning in physics, chemistry, and biology during this period, while Israel shone in math in 2025 and continues progressing.
So make it more relevant to more audience
Can't be antagonising to any. I can tell you from exp. I have a prompt btell8ng me that.
For this you need a audience shield.
For me game is finished like.
Q
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
Fwb is on a journey of bringing girls. They will be semi strangers to actual friends.
Do I let her call me dady in front of them across the board? Sir, neutral? I can't make up my mind.
Please chime in as I still wheigh the options and need some input. But provide some background.
Thanks
Your faithfully
SS
@Vermillion-Rx I think the robots fill very important gap. Boots on a ground.
You can bomb and shit, but you can't control an area. Not saying the robots will solve it tomorrow but they look like the best alternative to the dead soldiers (=lost political support), worth a shot and a chance of future development. This looks like the Terminator's scenes with the robots patrolling streets very likely.
The Nukes are an equaliser and a deterrent, the only thing that can be done against nukes is a shield.
I think that an efficient shield is out of reach, because it will always have to addapt to aggressor's new technology and being one step behind is not acceptable (unlike where aggressor is for example, a hacker and the worst that can happen is an economic loss in a sector).
The powers with nukes are lost forever pariahs and will never be conquered.
More so "they" will be a new power in any giver region and if willing so, they will subjugate or rally smaller countries.
In case of Iran it wouldn't mean imminent nuke escalation (I doubt it a lot), It would mean all local Arab countries would be lost to local influences. Out of West's hands.
Are we already observing that?
Isn't it why US spends silly money in bombing but hesitates to send troops (plus uncertainty of Iran not having a surprise).
Russia parcelling Ukraine.
EU planning for a joint military.
Read More@Typo-MAGAshiv sure as hell it came across like you tried to sneak into someone's pants
My seed is perma fucked. It is not appreciated for ""foot in a door"" with modern audiences..
BTW is there a feed without a game?
@MentORPHEUS I'm too poor with a global economy, but I'd rat5her not see the China shuffling cards.
The European countries denying US flights over their territory; some even might see that genocide isn't that one sided as pumped by media.
I have disregarded dumb opinions that Iran is too far to be ae threat to USA. Well times of wedging a war on a horse, only to one's neighbouring country is long gone. But I can't see why|how Iran would choose such a difficult target to ever attack with a nuke. Izrael on the other hand...
It is pretty safe to say that China has its finger in resupplying Iran. As to shot down any half asses decoy is costing a lot and US bleeds money.
This money are not used on infernal affairs and I wouldn't be surprised if democrats are sitting relatively quiet about a war as it hurts Republicas in at least 2 ways.
Immigration crisis is possibly getting less attention = more of them to vote.
Lack of funds or crisis will turn away some electorate.
Read MoreSo you basically say NO.
Therefore you are blue pill.
But I believe you can be a red pill alpha if you start with sidebar and a few fcks from my stash.

