Most women only have sex with men they'd want to be in a relationship with (at least most of the time from what I've personally gathered) unless he's a placeholder bf after a particularly rough pump and dump
Sometimes it's "just sex" but they hamster why they want a relationship
Anyway, it's just sad but true, women view sex as a transaction much of the time. World's oldest profession for a reason
I'd wager it's more of 1 than 2.
I've met very few women who genuinely, only want sex. That being said most of these hos are acting and couldn't muster behaving well in an LTR. At least without more guidance than I'm willing to give.
Most of this is because women fail to notice that the grass is green where they water it and not because it's greener on the other side of the fence
hos and the hos have more respect than the singular woman of two years.
This is an illusion
They treat you better because they are:
1) trying to please you in case you upgrade them
2) all they want is sex, so if you give it to them they are fully satisfied as long as it lasts
If you were to commit to any of those hoes they would drop in treatment. It's an illusion. They treat you well because of circumstance, not principle
In addition to the difficulty of maintaining an LTR in the current mating landscape, this might also have to do with the "Fast vs Slow life strategy" model. LTRs need more pronounced Slow traits.
It's crazy how you can go from a relationship of 2 years plus to hos and the hos have more respect than the singular woman of two years.
There is some fault of my own for getting lazy or excepting behaviors that I shouldn't in a LTR.
My experience, to some fault of my own, is hos treat me better, than I require from LTRs.
non-cowboys wearing cowboy hats are gay
I was so close to getting a Stetson back when I exclusively wore dress clothes (work related). I still think a cowboy hat would tie in nicely with my pashminas.
@JennyB @kloi sheesh, and I thought I was out of touch. OK, quick summary from memory.:
A bit over a year ago, some high school in TX had a track and field meet. Austin Metcalf, his twin brother, and some of their teammates were in a tent.
Karmelo Anthony was from a different school, and was trying to come into the tent. They told him to leave several times, and Karmelo threatened and escalated several times, saying shit like "touch me and see what happens" while steadfastly refusing to leave.
Austin Metcalf shoved him, and Karmelo responded by stabbing him right in the heart with a knife, killing him.
Since Austin was white and Karmelo is black, a shit-ton of tribalistic blacks leapt to his defense, spouting all kinds of ridiculous nonsense such as "it was self-defense!" or "it wasn't a knife! it was a cleat sharpener!" (spoiler alert: no such thing).
A Give-Send-Go campaign was launched for Karmelo's legal defense and "other expenses". Over $600k was raised for that murderous little shit, much of the donations having anti-white racist messages attached.
His family blew threw all the money on Cadillacs, a McMansion, and various other stupid shit. When it came time for the trial, he was stuck with a public defender because his family was now too broke to hire an attorney. Yes, after raising over $600k from Give-Send-Go alone, not to mention merchandise sales.
The only black candidates for jury duty said anti-white racist shit, and got disqualified.
Karmelo was quickly convicted, with every witness including his own making it obvious he was guilty, along with other evidence.
Blacks everywhere started chimping out, with the usual "he was a good boy!" and "he dindu nuffin!" The few level-headed blacks who agreed with the verdict and the rule of law are all being drowned out by the usual tantrums.
Read More@Kloi dude, anytime you say "to be fair", you have to make it a link to the "Letterkenny" clip. Dot red bylaws and shit.
Have some vcards

