@moorekom how about "tradthot chameleon" or something along those lines for flair? Something to make it clear to the newly-unplugging that these fakers are not to be trusted.
Agreed, they need to present themselves in the best light possible. I suppose Saturday is fine. I would also include the condition that she be at least late 20s and virtue signaling as a tradcon to qualify. How did you want to spice it up?
In essence, you're right.
In practice though - throughout most of history - a man was a king of his own home.
Sure, maybe she yipped and pushed the boundaries here and there.
Sure, maybe they were poor.
But in terms of family structures - generally speaking - the man was the king of his home.
It's true that it's in a woman's nature to shit test.
It's also true that every sane society in history, restricted and restrained women's nature.
So while the nature was always there, the nature didn't always enjoy the same degree of expression.
As men, we like to fix things. Sometimes we're inclined to fix a broken woman too.
This is a costly mistake.
A broken woman is like a black hole that will consume all that you have and more. It isn't worth it.
A woman is meant to be a man's help mate. The receiver of all he has to offer.
To be a receiver, she must be complete. A whole receptacle, who can actually receive. Not a broken vessel that will leak it all out.
I don't get the income-hate, though. A 30-year-old who makes over $75,000 a year is in the top income quartile for his age. That's pretty respectable, but I suspect that most young women are as delusional about money as they are about height. A woman who thinks that 6'2" is average is also likely to think that $75,000 a year is below average
Get a load of this: