"Avoid the unhappy and unlucky."
Most people have two categories of problems:
Problems of their own making
Regardless of the type, nobody wants to fucking hear it. If you're the type to always share your troubles, people will find you exhausting.
@Problematic_Browser Think about this. How can an EO apply to the president when only the president can draft an EO that contradicts it? He would be bound by the EO and would find himself unable to draft a conflicting EO that contradicts it, lest he be in violation of his previous EO.
Could you imagine such a hamstrung idea?
You are Brandolini's law made manifest.
I'm not going to waste any more time putting my facts against your feelings.
Not confused.
EO even apply to the president unless they are deemed illegal or overturned.
In this specific case, the EO made it clear who can declassify a classified document.
@Problematic_Browser Hubris indeed. No room to take the intellectual high ground when you don't even read or comprehend your own sources, you fool.
Only a fool rules our the possibility that they could be wrong.
Imagine the hubris it takes to think you have perfect knowledge.
@Problematic_Browser You still seem quite confused about what an executive order is.
It's the Chief Executive of the executive branch of govt, giving orders to those who work under him.
@Problematic_Browser It's about who is doing it. When you have somebody at the very top who, by way of decree, decides what the executive branch does and does not, the constitution pretty clearly says the buck stops with the President. There is no authority above him that dictates what he can and cannot do, outside the check and balance of the Judicial system and Congress with the power to impeach.
That means executive orders are for people under the President.
You somehow think executive orders aren't binding?
You keep demonstrating that it's your feelings, not the facts, doing your talking.