@OPStolen You will need to get creative. Most fucks can't easily be arranged during work hours, so you will have to be called in to work some very strange hours if you are going to use work as an excuse. Getting the side chick on side is a great help -get her to be available during work hours- but not all are going to be available or cooperative. Odds on you will only get a few fucks anyway and this so its mostly a case of having a few plausible reasons delivered with dead pan confidence. Its pattern that will ruin you. No one can argue with one or two freak occurrences but if you start a genuine affair, then you will need to fabricate a whole realm of make believe to cover yourself. Who can you really trust among your friends? Who would be up for being used as an alibi? What sports do you already practise that could take you to somewhere you can leave the phone in a locker? Could you have a work reason to travel away? Phone fills up and you have to clear some apps...

In the end it becomes an exhaustingly tangled web once one starts to deceive. I have been there. getting a fuck becomes a chore!

@Typo-MAGAshiv A good local well is massively appreciated by the girls and women who draw and carry water for their families. Something went wrong here and it won't be what the liberal critics suggest. This is my take as someone who once had a house in Africa in an area with no mains water (till it was stolen from me by local racists).

The one who talked about distorting the local economy was closest. What will have happened is that there will have been a feeding frenzy for free white man money. People will have drilled as many wells as they can in areas where their family or tribe members live and collected the money for their labour and for the sale of overpriced materials and accommodation for the "experts" sent out to lead the operation. They will not have considered even if the water is seasonal or not because Mr beast's man will have just paid over generously by the job. Mr beast's man on the ground will also have been incentivised just by life pressures to get the job done and go home not to consider complex local politics in a culture he does not know.

Now many wells are not provided as a public service by local councils but they are private enterprises. Women will pay a small amount to go to a private well if the water is good and the well is closer. (A good tree or artificial shade helps to sell a well too, as they can then gossip in the cool as they queue, drawing water is a very social activity that most girls actually enjoy) . Water sellers will have their own personal wells and send out a man with a hand cart or donkey cart to go round villages selling it by the jerry can. These guys in the water trade will pay to maintain their wells. They will have no incentive to maintain poorly sited cheaply made virtue signalling wells sunk on free white man money.

Aid really only has a place in a live emergency -where people can't help themselves and will die if you don't help them. Beyond that people need to pull themselves up or you build an economy with no foundations. One can trade kindly with them but that's all. (I nearly got beaten up once for saying that in an area where aid was the big money spinner).

@First-light

I prefer to say the west is human. Everyone is a racist deep down. We all feel more comfortable with the people we know and with our blood kin. Its no more complicated than that. The west created some multicultural crap that said we were all identical and needed to be treated identically but it was just bullshit to keep their own lower class people in check while newcomers were added to their countries competing for finite resources.

The nature of people has not changed. We are tribal by nature. Tribes can ally, women can go from one tribe to another in marriage, men from different tribes can become firm friends and settle within each other's lands but deep down we find it unsettling when a group of stranger men from anther blood line come to our lands and want to live with all the rights our fore fathers fought to give us but as a distinct group. We are all racists. The west just lied that it was not the case or that it was a bad idea to be racist. The western left made racism a thing. They stopped it being lynching or beating a man for no reason beyond his race and made it about not being allowed to choose to surround yourself with your own people, employ them by choice, let houses to them by choice, prefer their music and so on. This is just plain unnatural.

Your people like their blood kin and are loyal to them too.

I am not suggesting it is human to be cruel to other races or to treat them as less than one's own. This denies their and our own humanity. Hospitality is a great part of humanity. The stranger is always to be treated as a guest unless he comes for your life, land, women or property. We are, however, tribal by nature.

There is far more strife within the races than between them, simply because different tribes of the same race clash over resources more than tribes from different races. Look at most of the wars in history -they usually have local origins.

When it comes to colour codes you have a simple choice - try to retain the system to hate the west through it or let it go. If you want to cling onto it to excuse your hatred, then you will in return receive the hatred of an enemy not the hospitality due to the guest.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYy77IGsBFc

I prefer to say the west is human. Everyone is a racist deep down. We all feel more comfortable with the people we know and with our blood kin. Its no more complicated than that. The west created some multicultural crap that said we were all identical and needed to be treated identically but it was just bullshit to keep their own lower class people in check while newcomers were added to their countries competing for finite resources.

The nature of people has not changed. We are tribal by nature. Tribes can ally, women can go from one tribe to another in marriage, men from different tribes can become firm friends and settle within each other's lands but deep down we find it unsettling when a group of stranger men from anther blood line come to our lands and want to live with all the rights our fore fathers fought to give us but as a distinct group. We are all racists. The west just lied that it was not the case or that it was a bad idea to be racist. The western left made racism a thing. They stopped it being lynching or beating a man for no reason beyond his race and made it about not being allowed to choose to surround yourself with your own people, employ them by choice, let houses to them by choice, prefer their music and so on. This is just plain unnatural.

Your people like their blood kin and are loyal to them too.

I am not suggesting it is human to be cruel to other races or to treat them as less than one's own. This denies their and our own humanity. Hospitality is a great part of humanity. The stranger is always to be treated as a guest unless he comes for your life, land, women or property. We are, however, tribal by nature.

There is far more strife within the races than between them, simply because different tribes of the same race clash over resources more than tribes from different races. Look at most of the wars in history -they usually have local origins.

When it comes to colour codes you have a simple choice - try to retain the system to hate the west through it or let it go. If you want to cling onto it to excuse your hatred, then you will in return receive the hatred of an enemy not the hospitality due to the guest.

@Lionsmane8 I have always considered myself white. Not got a drop of non white blood according to a DNA test, so I really am white but I have never even heard of a snow nigger. To me Poles, Serbs and Croats are clearly white. I accept that at some point as one moves East, Russians gradually become more Asian than European. The Slavic ones in the West are obviously white by the time you get to the Baring Strait, they are Asian. Its a huge country.

Classifying people as "white" and "non white" or "Coloured" or whatever is not really a helpful distinction. It may have been useful for Western Europeans when they first came in contact with other peoples as defining who was from their lot and who from another lot but these days we really do know a lot more about the world and about DNA.

We know that skin colour is not a very significant marker in separating racial traits and more so cultural traits. For example the people in Australasia are quite black in colour but they couldn't be more distantly related to the subsaharan Africans genetically.

Blackness and whiteness is a thing the Left want to throw at us today as some sort of attempt to dismantle the power of men of European descent in a belief that it this will achieve some kind of social justice. This comes against the backdrop of civil unrest in the USA between those who are largely of European descent and those who are largely descended from slaves from subsaharan Africa.

The situation in the US is actually, a microcosm. It has a lot of influence on global thinking because the US is so powerful but it is a tiny bit of racial history. I grew up thinking that all black people were loud and full of attitude because all I had seen were these mixed race descendants of former slaves in the US. Then I met black Africans and realised that they were serious people politer and with more conservative values than the average white.

This blackness/whiteness thing is unhelpful and divisive. It will never achieve social justice. People who have not done so well need to get their shit together if they want their descendants to do better than they did, not expect white men to fix it for them. White men's ability to fix the planet has gone. Now they will do well if they just fix their own countries.

@Bozza All the fluffy feelings are great but, as I explained to my daughter, marriage is a contract with the law. The law cares nothing about your feelings.

The law won't bring your spouse back if they run away. The law won't make your spouse pick you up when you are down or even treat you with love and care. All the law will do in a marriage is come in at the end, when at least one person has decided it is permanently broken (i.e. when a marriage is actually over already). The law will then take one person's stuff and give it to the other. This makes nothing better and adds huge hurt. If children are involved its bad for their relationship with both their parents -one has legally robbed the other.

The feelings last as long as they are going to last, as long as you both work to keep them. They have nothing to do with the law. The law can't help touch feelings.

The reality is that you are married when you both tell witnesses you are married. You are divorced if you decide you are and lead separate lives. This was the old way before the law. It needs no law. About Priests got in on custom in a desire to regulate every bit of people's lives. Then the church and the state made an accommodation. Now the state carries on but unlike the church it won't even advocate for fidelity or even for loving your spouse.