@Lone_Ranger Tends to indicate a more feminised brain, just as a long ring finger in a man indicates a more masculine brain.

However. I am dubious that it makes a whole heap of difference and think its a poor indicator that does not deserve inclusion.

For one thing having a more masculinised brain does not make you a better man, it just makes you better at thinking in masculine ways -for example many ball sports players that need hand eye coordination have the long ring finger and short index finger. It doesn't make you a better man, just a man good at things men are more typically good at. Next time you see a tennis player have a little girly melt down on court, remember the fact he probably has a long ring finger, doesn't stop him being a bit less than stoic.

You might even find that a woman who thought more like you was easier to get on with. No one trait defines who we are. A woman who had many male behaviours and a muscular hairy body would not be attractive but a woman with one or two traits more typically found in men -like the ability to park a car well, is not necessarily less of a woman. Just as some men are dandies and seem to care too much about their appearance but are not actually weak or homosexuals.

rws-ammunition.com/en/infotainment/rws-bullets/rws-doppelkern-twin-core

There is nothing new about the partition bullet but this is one of its finest iterations from one of the best bullet makers in the world. This is far from their latest all singing all dancing bullet (it has two younger brothers that I may post too which outdo it in certain respects) but its a heck of a fine bullet. I have killed about 150 deer with this bullet. I have used other bullets and will use others but this is a great workhorse bullet that I highly recommend if you can be bothered to go to the great trouble of ordering it. (They don't seem in a hurry to sell them outside the EU). Germans generally favour factory ammunition (they seem to be a people who do not like tinkering little men in sheds) and their factory cartridges are very fine indeed but load this bullet for yourself and you can get half a minute of accuracy, hydrostatic kills half the time and and a sweet low recoil shot.

The ultimate bullet would be an impossible combination of traits but this one ticks a lot of them. You don't need vast energy transfer as much as totally reliable big energy transfer at vital organ depth -not earlier and not later. Many cartridge makers and home loaders fail to appreciate this fact. The bullet has to perform well at the speed your rifle flings it (not the speed a test barrel does) and still work OK whether it hits a shoulder blade or enters behind the ribs, whether it hits at 20 yards or 200. The perfect bullet does not exist but this is a very tolerant one at normal hunting ranges.

They didn't re-invent the wheel here, they just got the hardness of the cores and the thickness of the jacket perfect. This will in a stretch do anything up to a moose and down to a varmint with the nose cone only breaking up after it has passed through the ribs. After you have expended energy at a sensible depth, you want a core that reliably punches through any bones to exit and depressurise the chest cavity in case you have not killed outright, so that a failure to breathe will not let your target live long. This will also give you a better blood trail. A bullet that cuts hair so you can easily find the beginning of a faint blood trail is a further asset.

Whatever you do when you select a bullet, select for tolerance and reliable performance above massive energy transfer. Your ideal bullet will probably not actually win at any one stat but it will do it all pretty good. In a world where a "top trumps" mentality makes bullet makers want to have a massive stat to sell a bullet, this can lead people to avoid the steady reliable bullets that kill and kill time and time again without huge meat damage.

I would add that this morning a young man working a few days for me asked if my daughter had got a local sponsorship grant as a track athlete. (A number of guys from his training group have had this grant). She finished mid top ten in a national final the week before last but no we have had no sponsorship for her over the years apart from a collection of free T shirts and a couple of sports shop vouchers, less than the value of a pair of cheap shoes. She wouldn't say no and I know there is money about in small amounts for people who get to national finals but in the end that's not why you compete. I am not a beggar, so, poor man though I am, I have never searched on line for the forms and I guess she has never cared enough to do it herself because Daddy will pay for her shoes and transport.

Then I look at a collection of nearly made it female athletes who are now playing soccer -much more than the top ten nationally , more like the top 500+ when you think of all the big squads out there- and these girls are getting paid and bitching about it. Its nuts!