Iran funds and has involvement with many of the activities in these countries
Do i think it was always this way? No.
But current day? Iran has itself involved in it all
The west/Russia fucked up a lot of these countries with unnecessary adventurism
Right now Iran needs to stop having so much influence. And the west (and Russia) needs to stop toppling regime or supporting chaotic regimes there
The whole world needs to fuck off in this region. It's a hellhole. The middle East needs to modernize and stop being a badbaric third world hackey sack for greater powers
All instability in the Middle East leads back to Iran
All of it? Ever? That's a bold claim when you have the history of the middle east in the 20th and 21st century at your fingertips.
It's soundbite claims like that though that permit unilateral actions that side step congress, it's a fall in line statement, right? Once upon a time, and now very far down the memory hole, the line happened to be:
All instability in the Middle East leads back to Syria
All instability in the Middle East leads back to Iraq
All instability in the Middle East leads back to Afghanistan
All instability in the Middle East leads back to Libya
Once it was Mossad, then it was Hussein, then it was Bin laden, then it was Gaddafi but then Gaddafi was rehabilitated and so was Mossad but then they were a threat again and then and then and then... All instability in the Middle East leads back to Iran.
Dance, monkey. Dance.
Read MoreAlmost all instability in the Middle East leads back to Iran (let's include neocons for the hell of it)
Most people are just too mad at the J's/Israel to see it
Iran is the entire hell of the middle East and they just got neutered everywhere they had influence
I forgot to add terrorists to the list, too
Terrorists love gotten obliterated for Iran, too
Somehow only top military leadership, nuclear scientists, and terrorists put themselves on the line for Iran all day every day, even less than two hours after their predecessor got taken out in epic precision
Why?
Who shows up to those working conditions within hours of it happening knowing they are next?
Ask the real questions
Put aside the J question for a second and ask why and who shows up for work under those circumstances
When I say who wants to die for Iran, you can easily see who wants to or not by process of deduction:
Who died for Iran?
Senior military in air strikes and nuclear scientists
They showed up every day for work, even their replacements.
No one else wanted to.
Ask yourself why
No one wants to die for Iran, not even their own allies, other than Iranian senior military leadership and Iranian nuclear scientists you have to ask yourself why
Why would terrorists be honest with inspectors and why would anyone want to challenge what terrorists tell them?
What inspector wants to die for Iran?
I also doubt that Iran was forthcoming to the IAEA about what they had
I'm 100% certain the inspectors said "this all you got?" And Iran was like yeah
Who wants to get shot or killed asking extr questions from the world's largest sponsor of terror?
So they'll fund terrorism around the world but they won't fuck up the inspector? Because that checks out
Why would they have morals for the inspector but not for all the people they kill with terrorism?
I've yet to see you admit or acknowledge iran funds an insane amount (or even any) terrorism
Considering how much globalist influence there is (i can't believe I left out the world economic forum) i will double down on my criticisms of international organizations
I don't think will all of the conflicting influence international organizations have (especially considering who their pay pigs are) that they are operating in objective faith
Some country will always bastardize their influence because without funding they wouldn't exist and no country has equal influence
These organizations are by virtue compromised by their funders, many of who have conflicting geopolitical goals
@Vermillion-Rx The IAEA is far more specialized and transparent than the WHO
I want to see what the US intelligence is before i comment
You would have been wise to wrap the post after this sentence, instead of negating it by vaguely lumping completely different types of organizations together and assuming without offering specific and current/relevant evidence the presumption that the IAEA is nothing but corrupt.