Uncensored discussion of the four-year dark winter predicted by and carried out by Biden
@TheRedPike this information itself is interesting.
Even more interesting is the line of thought behind it. They seem willing to risk pushing to the brink of a neuclear war, because they figure that most of the enemy's 5000 neuclear bombs won't work...
@adam-l I had a lengthy conversation with a retired USAF colonel and USA brigadier general. a few montns back. I pointed out that the US has had two very expensive warhead refurbishment programs since the end of the cold war, necessary to make sure they would even work. I included some details related to expense and shelf life of such weapons. Meanwhile, the russians can barely keep a quarter of their sub fleet working at low tempo, with the damn things catching fire all the time. Their bomber fleet is in abysmal shape, leaving them to rely on the same few dozen bombers in their war and they are starting to lose them too. Finally, there is zero evidence they have had any sort of warhead referb program, instead putting their meager resources on new missile models that blow up all the time in testing.
And then I asked them, "will their bombs even work?" Both answered the same thing without hesitation: probably not.
What little money they have, they are spending it on show, not a viable arsenal. And I'm absolutely certain that's what they are telling Iran to do.
Extra credit: both france and israel are going start running into reliability issues if they don't get cracking on referb in the next 5 to 10 years.
Read More
1
4
@MentORPHEUS That was the second gulf war, not the first. We did actually find WMDs there the second time. No one cared because at that point it made no difference and, well, their presence seemed more due to laziness and mismanagement than an actual weapons program.
Why do i keep saying no one wants to die for Iran?
Other than that it's true:
- Israelis will die for Israel
- Americans will die for American
- Chinese will die for China
- Russians will die for Russia
- Ukrainians will die for Ukraine
Iranians don't want to die for Iran.
Why?
The entire prowess of Iran has been propped up by outside parties for a specific purpose
Total sham with an agenda that's why
People think I'm shilling for this side or that side. I'm not.
I don't have the full history of the region down for the past 100 years but I can look who is fucking it up the most
Terrorism is a huge no go. And it's been happening. Mainly Iran sponsored. The second Russia and Iran couldn't prop up assad he got toppled, and ironically there hasn't been as much chaos there. An Iranian ally (assad) was more of a terrorist than an actual terrorist who replaced him. (The irony)
Funny how that works. Terrorism isn't free. It costs money. Expect more peace in the middle East now that Iran's allies don't want to die for it, trump wants out, and Russia is low on shill bucks
The middle East should have never been fucked with the way it was. By everyone. The entire region (almost) is a shit fest from the global opportunism of the last 100 years plus
But also, their belief systems keep them in a 3rd world state motivated by biblical conquests and violence
The middle East isn't fucked up from any one thing but most of the fucked up shit in the middle east flows from irans bank roll in the modern era
The whole world needs to fuck off in this region.
Ah, I see you have decided to join me in the "fuck 'um all camp". Come, sit, we have s'mores!
1
2
Iran funds and has involvement with many of the activities in these countries
Do i think it was always this way? No.
But current day? Iran has itself involved in it all
The west/Russia fucked up a lot of these countries with unnecessary adventurism
Right now Iran needs to stop having so much influence. And the west (and Russia) needs to stop toppling regime or supporting chaotic regimes there
The whole world needs to fuck off in this region. It's a hellhole. The middle East needs to modernize and stop being a badbaric third world hackey sack for greater powers
1
2
All instability in the Middle East leads back to Iran
All of it? Ever? That's a bold claim when you have the history of the middle east in the 20th and 21st century at your fingertips.
It's soundbite claims like that though that permit unilateral actions that side step congress, it's a fall in line statement, right? Once upon a time, and now very far down the memory hole, the line happened to be:
All instability in the Middle East leads back to Syria
All instability in the Middle East leads back to Iraq
All instability in the Middle East leads back to Afghanistan
All instability in the Middle East leads back to Libya
Once it was Mossad, then it was Hussein, then it was Bin laden, then it was Gaddafi but then Gaddafi was rehabilitated and so was Mossad but then they were a threat again and then and then and then... All instability in the Middle East leads back to Iran.
Dance, monkey. Dance.
Read More
3
2
Almost all instability in the Middle East leads back to Iran (let's include neocons for the hell of it)
Most people are just too mad at the J's/Israel to see it
Iran is the entire hell of the middle East and they just got neutered everywhere they had influence
