• Register
  • Sign In
  • Top Tribes
  • The Hub
  • TheRedPill
  • The Dark Winter
  • 5th Gen War
  • Tech Talk
  • Blogs
  • All User Blogs
Viewing Thread Close





Close Thread
    

Copy Permalink
SeasonedRP
3h ago  The Hub

@Stigma Rothschild group was subject to a tax investigation in 2015. Epstein had very high up government connections. Someone like him is useful when facing tax issues. Not sure what you think this document represents. It's like hiring Eric Holder for a legal matter when having someone on the legal team with certain political connections would be useful.

2
    

Copy Permalink
Stigma
4h ago  The Hub

www.justice.gov/epstein

Put in any search term you're curious about.

1
    

Copy Permalink
Stigma
4h ago  The Hub

@Typo-MAGAshiv

They didn't use the Epstein files against him, because there's nothing to it at far as he's concerned, and their own guys come out looking far worse.

  • Mutually assured destruction

We've been over that before, they've kicked this football between themselves for a decade or so.

  • Why flip flop on the files then?

  • Why not release all of them?

  • Why delete files mentioning Trump?

No really, he and (by proxy) his supporters need to pick a lane. There's still 3 million documents not released, claiming he is exonerated (parroting his words) is laughable.

2
    
Full Image

Copy Permalink
Stigma
4h ago  The Hub

@SeasonedRP

He was already rich in 2015

Right? You think you get a contract with the Rothschilds in 2015 for $25m as your first ever go at it? Why do I need to point out the inference that this is their middle history? Where Epstein comes from and his motivations are also published.

The other, to my mind, clear inference is who the money is circulating around - I can't sit here and spoon feed every single implication, at some point you're going to have to find the narrative thread yourself.

2 3
    

Copy Permalink
SeasonedRP
4h ago  The Hub

@Stigma He was already rich in 2015. It appears he was some kind of spy or arms dealer. Otherwise, Robert Mueller wouldn't have been involved when Epstein first got in trouble with the authorities in FL. But in any event, info like that won't be in the files of some schlub at the FBI, or any files for that matter.

Rothschild should consider hiring attorneys that don't misspell its name in contracts (fourth line). That aside, ostensibly this agreement is for consulting services in connection with a tax investigation the group was facing at the time. Hardly some smoking gun, as Epstein was putatively some kind of financial advisor.

1 1
    

Copy Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv
4h ago  The Hub
@Butthead

@Stigma again:

if anything credible could have proven Trump committed any crime, the dems would have used it on him during the 4 years they controlled the Executive Branch via the walking carcass

Just look at all the ridiculous shit they tried to throw at him just to keep him from running again. They tried everything.

They didn't use the Epstein files against him, because there's nothing to it at far as he's concerned, and their own guys come out looking far worse.

2 1 4,547 vcards
    
Full Image

Copy Permalink
Stigma
8h ago  The Hub

@SeasonedRP

That won't be in any files, and we'll never get that information.

It is in the files. We know it's old money. We know it's the same old names and faces. If we can stop partisan stonewalling, and especially making reductive statements like "teens prostituting themselves" when the reality is they were raping children, and referring to them as different kinds of pizzas to be served up - we might get some way to talking about reality.

2 3
    

Copy Permalink
SeasonedRP
8h ago  The Hub

@Stigma Wealthy powerful men with teens prostituting themselves. Nothing new under the sun. I'm much more interested in the backstory on this guy and where he got his wealth. That won't be in any files, and we'll never get that information.

1 1
    

Copy Permalink
Stigma
9h ago  The Hub

@SeasonedRP Man, look, I don't care. He's argued the files aren't real. He's argued they're all a hoax. He's argued they've all been released and he's met his pledge. He's argued they exonerate him, which is a miracle for things that aren't real.

Which lie, specifically, should I believe? I'm choosing none of the above, and there isn't a single thing or person on the face of this earth that can disavow me of the idea that every single apparatus of the west isn't involved and corrupted by some really dark and malign scary shit.

This is why I don't care though, because we can't even get around to discussing what's important about them because the partisan circus rolls into town to defend their team.

Again, it's all fake and gay.

1 1
    

Copy Permalink
SeasonedRP
9h ago  The Hub

@Stigma Epstein tried to enlist Michael Wolff and Ken Starr in an attempt to take down Trump.

2 1
Load More


Stigma

12 Followers


"There is no greater sorrow then to recall our times of joy in wretchedness."


Send Message

?
Unknown

Bench: ?
Squat: ?

Literature and writing
Reddit Unverified

Stigma's Content

  • Desert of Ideas

    • 02/05/20 Your Ideology fills the void
    • More...

  • Stigma's Forums.Red Posts

  • Stigma's Forums.Red Comments

Other Users You Might Like

  • MentORPHEUS

    "User Has No Tagline"
  • ThePrivateMan

    "Confidence, Charisma, Competence, Leadership - What All Men Must Have"
  • Anteros

    "User Has No Tagline"
  • CopperFox3c

    "That which is in the way becomes the way"
  • bambinosupremo

    "Here to post shit and make your life better than it was before. And to get ripped. And to check out shit as well. One Hundred Sixty Characters of good shit. Yes"
Problem With User?
Block User
Back to Top © 2026 Forums.RED All Right Reserved | Page generated in 0.1567 seconds.