@Stigma that article is one of the saddest things I've read in a long time
@Typo-MAGAshiv www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15484739/School-starters-nappies-parents-toilet-training.html
Worse, actually. 1 in 4. No demographics mentioned outside of possible learning disabilities, but then if 1 in 4 of brits have a learning disability we're properly fucked.
The regions mentioned are some of the epicentres for demographic replacement however, so I wouldn't be surprised to find that being a root cause.
I do: freedom, and let those who can't fend for themselves just fucking rot.
Yeah, not wrong.
were not toilet trained
OK, I have a few questions.
1) were the survey takers the kind of feminized pansies who by "toilet trained" mean "boys need to sit to piss"? Or are they using the real definition of the phrase?
2) those "1 in 7" kids - how many of them are descended from imported Turd Worlders vs how many are of native British stock?
It’s fucked from the bottom to the top and I don’t have any more solutions.
I do: freedom, and let those who can't fend for themselves just fucking rot.
@Bozza Two things happened yesterday that annoyed me.
The lords voted to ban social media for under 16s - a blanket ban for any site that allows for communication. That’s basically the entire internet. This kind of ban will require age verifications everywhere.
The second thing was an article detailing that 1 in 7 children entering education could not read anything, could not feed themselves and were not toilet trained.
My argument has always been that parents should be observing and limiting their children’s technology time, because that’s what parents do - keep their children’s best interests in mind.
Well so it turns out a lot of parents can’t even teach their kids to shit and piss right so we’re not even fucking close to my method.
It’s those kinds of people that make the state feel it’s appropriate to reach into all of our lives, or even give them the excuse to do so. It’s fucked from the bottom to the top and I don’t have any more solutions.
Read More@Stigma I had forgotten to get back to this. Anyway...
From Brave's AI, with occasional emphasis added:
Legal Definition: Under U.S. law, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 2331(5), domestic terrorism is defined as activities that:
Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state criminal laws;
Appear intended to:
Intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
Influence government policy through intimidation or coercion;
or
Affect government conduct by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping;
and
Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
These idiotic disruptors, including the dead fat dike, have all been doing that kind of shit. Hence, domestic terrorists.
CC: @MSNBCorpheus er I mean @mentorpheus
@SeasonedRP @deeplydisturbed @stigma us talking to MSNBCorpheus er, @mentorpheus in a nutshell:
@Typo-MAGAshiv I stand corrected on those points.
She was a domestic terrorist who attempted to murder a federal agent who was carrying out his lawful duties.
I find that a bit too loaded to go as far as that with you. Those nouns and verbs have pretty high bars to clear… but I guess we won’t know cause she was retarded and died. Lol.
She was fleeing
That part is incorrect. She was trying to get in the way, obstruct, and disrupt as much as possible.
She defied a stop order
She also defied multiple other commands, including to leave the area (which would have avoided the attempted detention and her death had she followed it) and to get out of the car (which would have avoided her death had she followed it)
She was a domestic terrorist who attempted to murder a federal agent who was carrying out his lawful duties.
@Typo-MAGAshiv It’s disingenuous to the extreme to
-
Claim she didn’t hit him
- Ignore that she was fleeing from an order
I get not liking authority, I get wanting to protest against your political opponents and their motives, I get that she probably shouldn’t even be dead.
However, in order to even begin mitigating the gap between world views, @mentorpheus needs to at least observe the objective facts.
-
American police are armed
-
Vehicles are considered dangerous weapons
-
She hit him
-
She defied a stop order
- She was fleeing
Given all of these things are true there is a much greater than zero chance she winds up dead. She was too stupid to fathom the sandbox she decided to play in and she got the worst outcome for her actions. She had plenty of steps between life and death and she rejected them all.
Moralising it, virtue signalling it, turning it to a progressive/punk/resistance narrative is retarded - like her.
His reluctance to even bother grappling with these objective facts tells me all I need to know, and the discussion shouldn’t be coerced into being anything other than a stupid woman dying in a monumentally stupid way.
Read More
