"She'll feel attraction to the christian dude, but it won't be sexual because she doesn't want to get impregnated by him, only get financially covered."
Oh' that's why there is such thing as the friend zone for women! this is why it happens. she can like you, without feeling sexually attracted.
it seems like women are attracted to the nice guy, provider man as @Osiris wrote: "What would a woman want with an altruistic man? What ever he gives her! She’s shaking the money tree while it’s bearing fruit. This isn’t a conventional attraction, more accurately, his altruism attracted her attention." and @TiberiusBravo87 wrote: "Good clean hard-working Christian guy that spends time volunteering everywhere he can would make women think he's a great provider or caretaker. They get attracted to that idea without that raw lust attraction they get for actual alpha males."
BUT apparently that providerness doesn't create that "raw lust attraction they get for actual alpha males." So are there 2 completely different attraction points in women?
- being able to provide for her children (provider, hard-working Christian guy)
- giving her strong children (alpha male)
So she only feels major sexual attraction to the alpha male in order to get impregnated by him and then feel 'some' NON - SEXUAL attraction to the provider, hard-working Christian guy so that he can pay the bills so her children survive.
She'll feel attraction to the christian dude, but it won't be sexual because she doesn't want to get impregnated by him, only get financially covered.
So I was thinking: 2000 years ago being a provider and an alpha male went together. if you could be a dominant man you couldn't make money and provide for any woman's children. that's why women feel some sexual attraction the provider too.
but in 2020 women can make plenty of money without any man at all. (Just head over to Twitch!) Therefore I'm assuming that this just leaves us with one point of sexual attraction: the dominant, alpha male because that's the guy she wants to get impregnated by.
But all of this leaves me with a couple questions - (keep in mind I literally just got introduced to TRP a week ago so I''m missing a lot of info..):
Why do we always make it out to be that women are sexually attracted to the rich guy if the real sexual attraction comes from being a dominant, asshole, alpha male?
to be clear: is the #1 attraction point that men have is being dominant, nothing else because women want to have strong children... ?
- (random question) I've been hearing so much about men having to be more vulnerable and emotional because it's mentally healthier to express emotions rather than repress them. I understand why being stoic and logic based is attractive to women, but I still don't understand why the blue pillers are wrong when they say it's healthier to express emotion. if it's healthier it's healthier?
ANYWAYS.... TRP has completely changed my perspective on everything. I feel happy to be the 20M that I am. I had no clue why being a man is fucking awesome being that I come from a family where my mom is more masculine than my dad and both of my brothers are on ADD/ ADAHDHSJII fucking pills. Wholly shit I had no idea how blue pilled I was lfmao. thanks yallRead More
Search up on google "alpha male" and the first result is "The myth of the alpha male" with that article starting with: Single straight guys: If you want to attract more women, research suggests you should cultivate kindness and altruism.