@deeplydisturbed When you are horny, having the ability to have casual sex to meet your needs is not a "waste of time". It is a useful skill. Like knowing how to cook when you're hungry.

This bizarre idea that talking to women in a way the women enjoy, flirting, then having casual sex with the women is some kind of huge, hoop-jumping investment that requires all of your time and energy such that you have no choice but to turn out to be a loser as an adult is super silly.

A lot of the time, the frat boy who gets laid is also majoring in engineering or computer science, and thanks to his fraternity networking connections, he ends up being guy #1's boss.

You can fuck your way through college and have a good time and still be a high quality man. The idea that men who do that lose in the end while men who work hard and don't fuck their way through college win in the end is internet justice porn. Social skills rule the world. Most of the time, the pussy-slayer men also do very well in life, and the cant-get-laid loser men are also loser adults. Because the kind of guy who can't figure out the game and get laid in college is the kind of guy who ends up in a cubicle while the kind of guy who can get laid ends up in management.

@arakouzo

Who the fuck wastes any time tryin to show value to a 19 year old girl, other than saying what is needed to be said to fuck her?

You are mixing up two completely different types of people:

1. Good men, quality men, solid men all work hard when they are young to establish themselves. Like Chris Rock says, these are the "pussy later" men. These men tend to do best in the long run.

2. Players and boys who are jumping through hoops (or just have it like that) to impress 19 year old girls. They are "pussy now" men. These men tend to fall apart after 35-40. No one wants to work with or befriend this sort of man.

Man #1 does not fuck around at frat parties unless he has homework done and just needs to get laid. Man #2 probably cheats on exams and gets papers written for him.

Sure there is overlap in the Venn circles here, because nothing is black and white. But this is the more realistic view IMO.

I started watching a lot of habitat reconstruction videos after being furious with how inept and defeatist that Californians are regarding the fires. All over the world people are rising up to solve problems which to them seemed impossible. If you've ever watched World War Two science videos then you'll know how ingenious people were to etch a few more wins in highly specific environments. For example the dimples on golf balls were invented by a program to blow up a dam so that the air dropped mine would rolls backwards as it dropped. People are doing huge things all over the planet. California with all of it's windfall money did fuck all to help itself. Everyone knows now that California and therefore Californians are retarded, but I rejected the place and left during a time when it was still considered to be the dream. I could see that they didn't have any useful qualities about them. If you sit around thinking like and being a faggot then everything will start going wrong for you. It doesn't matter if it's commonly understood or how it's branded. Don't chase the hype. We can do anything. We can terraform the environment, replace shitty bloated jquery with modern code, lose a hundred pounds of fat, anything.

India's Water Revolution #1: Solving the Crisis in 45 days with the Paani Foundation