Oppression isn't required in a self sedating system. That's the magic of materialism.
There are large communities on various social media that do nothing but complain about modern debt slavery and backsliding economic conditions in the first world.
The content creators of these communities unintentionally support the system by providing consumable throwaway entertainment to their readers, ironically turning their politics into commodities to be consumed.
After their audience, (which is mostly agreeable pussies who champion strong language only in anonymous written form) consumes the content, they get to feel good for "fighting back" while actually doing less than nothing.
The limp wrists typing "let's just fucking guillotine the billionaires" from their iPhone on their 20 minute lunch break at Best Buy are sedated in the same fashion as the 57yo muttering "fucking immigrants" at Fox News.
The limp wrist is simply subject to a modern delivery channel of the sedativeRead More
@destraht Yes. Those in charge are no different than any other in charge, they amass power and become more and more vulnerable to more and more enemies. It's hard to fathom how there could ever be a system without intentional oppression of the masses. Perhaps a system in which elected leaders across a coalition of dominant countries were executed at the end of their term -or some more sophisticated measure- could allow for leadership with an eye for reducing suffering. Maybe even reduction in deceit? But it seems implausible that this wouldn't be corrupted too. Power cannot be stabilized.
It’s funny because they are completely correct. Women’s freedoms are solely based on the collective goodwill of men.
We could go any day, ‘Nah, I’ve had enough of you bugging me girl’, - either collectively or individually - and have them cook some casseroles in the kitchen, or whatever, using psychological, economical, physical means.
I don’t condone that but matter of fact is this: No matter how much women elevate themselves and bring down men, there will always be this power gap. Women will always feel at the mercy of men who tolerate them.
Corollary: the more women bring down men, the more disgusted they are about their sires - hence these protests.Read More
@hoit Fuck. What have the men in the world unleashed? Who is organizing these global events? We are to believe that women around the world suddenly all united to get worked up around the same specific issue? I don't think that it works like that. There are men behind this bullshit.
'We'll never solve violence for all, but maybe we can stop violence just against us women'
@TheStoicCrane The offense of being enslaved for other people purposes (paying for/raising a step kid, giving one's life to the company) causes confusion when we try to fully parse our priorities. Unplugging from societal programming is hard because we identify with what we have invested energy into. Should I follow my basic nature of fucking and fucking off? Or should I engage with my more mammalian nature of cultivating a dominant tribe? Both approaches are really dictated by the drive to optimize circumstances. The important thing is to do what feels right, while constantly assessing outside influence, ensuring you're not being misled by manipulative forces.
"The mayor of Toronto believes in free speech, but he has asked you to not hold this event. Will you reconsider?"
"I'm not going to reconsider ... supporting free speech."
Librarian in Canada's most desolate sjw mordor refuses to deny room booking to a speaker criticizing male trannies competing in female sports and invading female spaces.
@GayLubeOil Men are told to speak only when spoken to in the feminine domain. Women love power and love to practice exercising it over whoever will let them. It just doesn't make sense to distinguish needs from wants when the best way to get either is to expect it. They naturally optimize for most power with least responsibility. A woman is ever conscious of preventing their henchmen from seeing what power with responsibility looks like because it's so obviously preferable for everyone but her, so men recite their Stockholm syndrome slogan "male privilege" while doing their master's bidding. I wonder, if a male feminist doesn't check his privilege in a forest, is he still an oppressor?
Actually, I wonder if any man with enough space and time to think his thoughts out loud without a woman guiding him or putting him to work would slowly unravel the truth. Would it be fair to say that men, left to their own devices, are driven to erudition? I think at least truth. Truth is power for anyone, a woman's wisdom is to horde it for yourself.Read More