Half of the people on here were saying there was going to be world war III. What has happened instead has been everyone distancing themselves from Iran
That it hasn't yet broken into a multi-nation hot war YET, does not negate the extremely dangerous brinkmanship in play.
Are you aware that:
Pakistan vowed to use one of their nuclear bombs on Israel, if ANYONE uses a nuclear bomb on Iran?
China asserted that they stand with Iran
Russia asserted the same, and offered Iran a missile defense system which Iran interestingly turned down for the time being?
This trope of "Iran has no friends or allies, they will just fizzle out in like 48 hours" really amounts to US and Zionist propaganda and cope.
This is actually going easy on them. Wait till Iran lays out the case that the IAEA got infiltrated by Mossad, which used the good faith participation of Iran to then murder their top nuclear scientists.
these international agencies are often agenda driven and have soft influence
Often??? Tell us what the track record of the IAEA has been over the last several decades, and name just one case where you have proof that their judgement or performance has been proven incompetent, much less biased and agenda-driven.
Otherwise, just cut to the chase and admit you just spouted out a bunch of partisan word salad without a scintilla of evidence to back it up.
@Typo-MAGAshiv Dude. This is a PROPAGANDA video you posted. Not 30 seconds in they're saying, oOOOoh, well if it was OBAMA we'd be saying what a great thing , but Trump is held to a little bit different standard!!!
No, you MAGA fucksticks-YOU are not holding TRUMP to any kind of standard AT ALL! If you held YOURSELVES to any kind of standards, you'd be admitting you got suckered by Trump and Maga, and renouncing them.
But, that's not what's baked into the GOP OR its supposed breakout branch MAGA. By definition, conservatives tend to conserve the status quo, to hew to tradition, to stick with things the way they are.
Liberalism by its very definition, means a willingness to break from tradition, to reject old ways, to branch out and try new ideas in search of those that work better than status quo.
The Democratic party is currently polling in the 28-35% approval range- AMONG DEMOCRATS It's the Republicans and GOP that I've watched circle their wagons around their incumbents, and defend them no matter how many blatant lies they tell and failures their policies lead to. Reaganomics, the First Gulf War/Saddam has WMDs. Invading Iraq will be a cake walk. The Taliban are nothing but backward goat herders living in caves we'll be in and out of Afghanistan in weeks.
Propaganda like the shit you posted above, only helps to reinforce your self assurance in the face of repeated failures and feedback that your party, and your choice of leaders, are consistently wrong about everything and keep leading to terrible outcomes. It does nothing to pass along useful information, only to steer you to work against your own interests. How blue pill is THAT???
Read Moreincluding the fact that Iran was willfully complying with the terms of the deal and openly showing that they were not enriching uranium beyond what was needed for their power generating reactors and for medical isotopes [emphasis added]
Not really. Secretary of State Rubio addresses that and other things in here:
youtu.be/zfuTysNbjDI?si=i2p11X-1Ym3BRs4M
It seems there's a lot that no one on here knew.
@Typo-MAGAshiv OK fair enough, I'm incorrect that Obama's peace prize got awarded FOR the nuclear deal.
Everything else I've said about it stands, including the fact that Iran was willfully complying with the terms of the deal and openly showing that they were not enriching uranium beyond what was needed for their power generating reactors and for medical isotopes. (Iran has a very advanced medical system by modern standards.)
Obama got a Nobel Peace Prize for this accomplishment
was the Nobel Committee comprised of Time Lords? Because Obama's nuclear deal with Iran was completed in 2015, and they awarded him the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, for the Grand Achievement of Not Being Dubya Bush. It was quite the farce, though not as bad as when one of those was awarded to Yasser Arafat (the Father of Modern Terrorism!).
Anyway, whether that was a deliberate lie or just a monumentaln display of profound ignorance, expect some vcards coming your way.
How exactly was it a shitty deal, exactly???
It relied a lot on just the word of a bad faith actor, and gave them billions of dollars with which to fund terrorism.
This article gets into it a bit.
One of those (typically Democrat) noble intentions, but head-in-the-clouds ignorant schemes.
Read MoreA little vignette that recent events brought back into memory.
In 1984, working my first job as a pump attendant at a gas station. The price of gas had fluctuated upward a few pennies, not connected to any geopolitical current event. At that job, you heard lots of unsolicited complaints from the public when prices moved upwards, but very notably, NEVER heard a peep when they moved downwards.
Anyway, this very old man was there to buy gas at well below $1 per gallon for his V8 powered Lead Sled, and went off on a rant when he saw the price was fractionally higher than the week before. He practically screamed in his husky quavering old-man voice, "WE SHOULD HAVE JUST TOLD THOSE IRANIANS HOW MUCH WE'D PAY THEM FOR GAS!!!1!!!" Dude was SERIOUSLY worked up with spittle literally flying as he hissed out his angry complaint. I remember, as a minimum wage service worker with ZERO power to set prices and ZERO prior involvement in geopolitics with one foot still in legal childhood, just standing there, thinking, "What the fuck, old man?!?!?"
Read MoreLooking at "the receipts" of your confidentlywrong assertions about this unfolding situation last week, you've got some fact checking and personal reflection to get caught up on.
Try to not take this as the normies outside this space usually reflexively do, as a petty personal attack to get rejected out of hand and ultimately just reinforcing the factually incorrect statements from before that were getting addressed.
@Typo-MAGAshiv How exactly was it a shitty deal, exactly??? Iran was complying with its terms, and willfully allowing inspectors into their facilities any time they wished. That stopped when Trump backed out of the deal, and Trump did NOTHING afterward but gloat to his base that "It was a bad deal because Obaman, amIrite?"
Obama got a Nobel Peace Prize for this accomplishment; I suspect partisan bitterness over this underlies many of the otherwise unsupported critiques coming mostly from right wing partisans.
It was a shitty deal mainly for Iran itself, as the Mossad infiltrated the inspection agencies and ultimately used information thusly ill-gained to assassinate top Iranian nuclear scientists.