@adam-l ouf man, you again managed to blow my mind. Just the other day I was thinking : women want stable men, but unstable relationships.
Women never had the luxury of a stable husband back in their evolutionary history, that's why they never evolved the capacity to "settle" - or to appreciate their husbands, for that matter.
@SeasonedRP shit tests are congruence tests. I see why they need those to survive "socially". But to survive "physcally" i don't see how they need those. In my eyes, optimal survival strategy for a woman is submission and obedience (or machiavelian manipulation).
@Vermillion-Rx despite what they say, women don't see us as partners. They see us as opponents most of the time, sometimes they see us as fish/prey.
You can't trust a woman (not fully at least) because her nature is duplicitous. She has to, the weak have no code of honor. Everything is opportunistic.
You know Donald Rumsfeld's quote: "Trust but verify". With women it should be "don't trust, always verify".
@podwiazka sorry, i hate to say it this way but you're obviously ugly. You have an ugly girl ideology. Pretty girls don't spend their time trolling men online to prove something. They're busy catering to them.
@podwiazka no he can't. Men who can tend to keep better company.
@podwiazka body count is primordial. The town bicyle is unlovable.
@sean_karaya haha, my friend and I always call them sheng-nus, glad to see someone else gets this reference. There is nothing you can respond to these besides having one of these precious prime age girls under your arm while you flip them off with the other hand.
@podwiazka please guys, keep her on, this is prime time entertainment and grade 1 educational material.
@podwiazka there are waaay too many red flags in that paragraph.
