moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla

4 days ago  WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

@polishknight I would advise including these comments are a separate image to make sure the context is provided completely and separately. If that can't be done, you should not include them at all.

@Typo-MAGAshiv

1 2

moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla

4 days ago  WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

@polishknight This fits. I would go with leftovers. Epiphany phase women are waking up to the reality that their turn in the carousel is over and are typically looking for commitment from AB or BB. This woman has given up on that because she cannot get anything else than short term commitment.

2

Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR.

4 days ago  WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

@polishknight I'd advise cropping out the comments, as they lack context; how'd we get from her complaining about her life to trying to shame a dude for a 6- year age gap?

For flair, I'd go with "cock carousel rider".

CC: @lurkerhasarisen, @moorekom, @woodsmoke

2

woodsmoke Respectful reprobate

5 days ago  WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

@lurkerhasarisen

Agreed. This woman has poorly played the hand dealt her but she hasn't torpedoed herself yet. She could still pull it back and stick the landing. I wouldn't place strong odds on that happening, particularly given she's essentially asking the sisterhood for permission to become a rampaging turboslut like the rest of them, but it is a reasonable possibility.

So, IMO not a good fit for the spirit of the forum (though I agree perhaps reframing/rewording the rules could be beneficial to clearing that up for everyone), but definitely a highly instructive example for the tribe. She hasn't necessarily done anything wrong - pursuing education to the point of becoming a "whole medical doctor" certainly ain't doing her any favors but it's not something from which there's simply no recovery, like having another man's bastard child in tow. However, she also doesn't seem to have done much of anything right, which is often just as important.

cc: @moorekom @Typo-MAGAshiv @polishknight

Read More
3

Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR.

5 days ago  WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

@moorekom

I do not think she will fit in the weekend either

Really? Why not?

moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla

6 days ago  WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

@First-light

She was only a willing passenger and cheerleader on the bus when the bus was saving her from the walk in the direction she wanted to go.

Well put.

moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla

6 days ago  WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

@Typo-MAGAshiv

While we can discuss editing Rule 5 to make it clearer, it is to be understood that the rules are in conjunction to the "understanding our theme" post. Maybe we can move it to the top of the rules list as a must read article or include it in Rule 5 directly.

I do not think she will fit in the weekend either. This is why we have Whereallthegoodmenare and the tribes portion. If @polishknight wants to write an essay on why women like this end up asking the big question and why men walk away from them, it can be hosted there. Even then, I think it should focus on how this is an avoidable issue and how women complicate their dating lives unnecessarily.

cc: @lurkerhasarisen

1 2

Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR.

6 days ago  WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

@lurkerhasarisen

I don’t see this as a case of the dual mating strategy.

It certainly isn't.

If that's our requirement, though, then we should amend rule 5 to mention something about posts containing evidence that the woman in the post is participating in Dual Mating Strategy. As it's currently written, she fits.

If you and @moorekom are both against featuring her as a weekday post, why not a weekend post under rule 9?

2 1

Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR.

6 days ago  WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

@moorekom hmm. I need to do some re-reading, as it's been a while since I've read anything besides the rules and the flair guide.

Thing is, we've featured Carols who weren't cock carousel riders in the past, as long as they met the other criteria in rule 5 (or rule 9 on weekends).

We might ought to reword rule 5 a bit if being a virgin is enough to completely disqualifies a woman who otherwise meets the rule. Again, she is seeking commitment (which satisfies the first clause) while also being entitled and unreasonable and while complaining that she can't find a decent guy (any of which satisfies the second clause).

CC: @lurkerhasarisen, @PolishKnight

1 2

moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla

about a week ago  WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

@Typo-MAGAshiv

From "About" section (emphasis mine):

In response to r/niceguys, this sub is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.

From "understanding our theme":

Our central theme is exposing women who seek Good Men for commitment and financial stability after dating jerks, riding the cock carousel, and who likely have children they want provided for.

This is called a dual-mating strategy, aka Alpha Fucks/Beta Bucks. This strategy of dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is not only planned by many women, but it's encouraged by feminists.

While this girl has her own set of problems, as we've been discussing here, she does not fit the theme.

The top comment in reddit is:

Ehhhhh.... This one seems a little harsh here. I mean, she's worked hard and is even a virgin. I get that having never really engaged with men in her teens are early twenties and she then experiences online dating; it's probably quite disheartening for her.

The guy who informed her about caereers not mattering is correct though, as we have seen multiple times on this forum.

I actually sympathise with her a bit.

Intention to commit a crime is not the same as committing the crime. We showcase the latter and my point is that she falls under the former category. If it can be proven that she does fall under the second category, we can showcase her in the sub.

Read More
1 3
Load More