Admins,
We need a new folder tree for disseminating information. Here is an example of Feeds and Folder Patterns for Information and Posting.
Primary Feeds
New (All Tribe Feeds) What is Newest in Each of the Tribe Feeds. Top 2. Hot (All Tribe Feeds) What is New and HOT in Each of the Tribe Feeds. Top 2 in last week which are ALSO Highest Positive Posts either star or upvotes for others to read.
Tribe Feeds One Subject where the TRIBE is the subject. This does not work for selecting focus or subjects.
There should be a SUBJECT TREE within each Tribe, starting with a primary subject folder.
Examples
The Red Pill
Red Pill Game
Red Pill vs Feminism
Red Pill Intersexual Relations
Which would further breakdown into specific categories. Red Pill Game Written In-Field Examples Solipsism Kinetics Social Proof Frame – Self-Presentation Looks – Self-Presentation Game Body Improvement Books on Game
etc.
This way, we can form the best of the best for each subject, rather than 1,000 random posts.
Obviously, the subjects need to be a complete list that is better described by the subjects, but you get the idea.
Right now, the post are too random to help out someone looking for a subject or a focus of thought.
Thank you, Wyrm
Read MoreThe result was that by the time you learned all the answers, they changed all the questions.
Was Rowdy Roddy Piper the guy in charge?
I would like to see the subject headings like the old Red Pill forum, something to sort by topic easier with some understandable layout. Some things are Game driven, others Red Pill Basics, etc. Something to be able to sort all of this information into something selectable.
@MentORPHEUS I'm a generous soul, so I'll not only match your contribution, but I'll replenish your supply.
and I'm 100% not crying myself to sleep at night. Definitely not
tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SuspiciouslySpecificDenial
I will note that there was at least a three-year overlap between the first time I used a computer in a class and the last time a used a slide rule in a class.
For reference, I was writing programs in FORTRAN on punch cards in college.
In the early 80s, an older computer nerd friend bought some obsolete computer tape drives and got one working with a then-modern desktop computer. It stood almost 7 feet tall, weighed so much that he reinforced the subfloor under his room, and required a surprising amperage of 3 phase power to run. Since this was absurdly expensive to get installed to a residential address, he built a 3 phase converter. The regional occupational center was also auctioning off obsolete punch card readers, which were the size of old school library copiers and also needed a pallet jack or forklift to move around.
While we're on the subject my Granddad once told me about the last project he worked on at Hughes Electronics before retiring. They wanted to record gigahertz radar signals directly to magnetic tape. They could have used a rotary-head Mitsubishi tape drive (like a giant VCR) off the shelf, but the project demanded American supplied hardware. So, they tried to make a big Ampex 1 or 1-1/4 magnetic tape player do the job. They were running the tape at 128 inches per second, and laying the data down through 16 heads staggered across the width of the tape. They aaaaaalmost got it somewhat working, but were running into the problem of by the time they got all 16 heads aligned and calibrated, the high tape speed had worn them out and they needed replacement and starting the alignment and calibration from square one again.
Read MoreFWIW: the new interface is confusing to me, but then again, so was the old one. For reference, I was writing programs in FORTRAN on punch cards in college.
This reminds me of when I was a Lieutenant working with a highly classified weapon system. Every year or so we would get a major update: I guess they figured that if it was hard for us to keep up with all the references and constant training, it would be impossible for the commies to keep up. The result was that by the time you learned all the answers, they changed all the questions.
Top tier technical skills do not trump social skills. The proof emerges in hierarchy after hierarchy, across every enterprise and field. Technical superiority alone finds a low ceiling in the hierarchy, and the figures who reach the top echelons do so mostly on the merits and outcomes of their social acumen.
I can vouch for that, although I’ll add that physical attractiveness / presence weigh heavily in one’s “social acumen” score. There was a time in my life when I was arguably the best person in the world at what I did. I’m usually “the funny one” in whatever group I’m in, and I treat even the lowliest E-1 like a valuable member of the team. However, being built like a hobbit in a military organizations meant that I had to be twice as good to get half as much recognition as some guys whose sole qualifications were looking good in a uniform and their ability to kick in doors.
Read More@Typo-MAGAshiv just so you know I'm not taking any of your criticisms personally, and I'm 100% not crying myself to sleep at night. Definitely not.