Typo-MAGAshiv @Butthead

9 hours ago  The Public Square

@Lone_Ranger agreed, which is part of why our posting standards at WAATGM are so strict.

Have you read the sidebar? The WAATGM one, I mean. Mainly the "understanding the purpose of WAATGM" link.

1 3

Lone_Ranger

9 hours ago  The Public Square

@Typo-MAGAshiv Antelope is implying that anyone consuming OF content that contains within it underaged minors needs to be locked up. I never said that - clearly the duty of care falls with the platform operators, not the consumers.

2

Lone_Ranger

9 hours ago  The Public Square

@Typo-MAGAshiv uhhmm yep, that is because he was posting about having sex with a 13 year old. And no, I was not trolling him. Guy has a serious screw loose and is a danger to all around him

(I know, I know, you're tempted to explain to me that Paedophile should only be used to describe adults who have sex with pre-pubescent children, rather than just children)

3 1

Lone_Ranger

9 hours ago  The Public Square

@Typo-MAGAshiv Right, I get it now. I was sort of flitting between both of those posts - I can see how easy it is to get confused!

TLDR: I honestly think the re-posts of the post that women put up (either dating profiles or dating questions) are the most educational content on this site. Coupled with some decent analysis and translation from site users, they very clearly point out some pitfalls to watch out for.

Its the first thing I look for when I log in. The least amusing content is two dudes slugging it out over some minor point, calling each other fags etc.

1 2

Typo-MAGAshiv @Butthead

9 hours ago  The Public Square

@Lone_Ranger you did, when you kept calling that one retard, FailingToReform, a pedophile

What little I saw at the time, I thought you were just trolling him and riling him up.

2 4

Typo-MAGAshiv @Butthead

9 hours ago  The Public Square

@Lone_Ranger

The post that you included there (the girl that wants to dump her great guy because no 'spark') is so revealing, so educational that it would be a crying shame if it those kinds of posts were not allowed [emphasis added]

Agreed. In fact, I posted that because it's the example of the kind of content we do want, at least as far as the WAATGM-ITM flair. I wanted you and @polishknight to understand why his original post in this thread does not fit.

When I said:

She fits none of it

...in my previous reply in which I included that link, "she" referred to the woman in @polishknight's screenshot.

Sorry if that wasn't clear.

1 2

lurkerhasarisen

10 hours ago  The Public Square

@Typo-MAGAshiv

She was texting her married boyfriend moments before, and she had just finished a 12-hour shift, so she wasn't paying attention to her surroundings. She got off the elevator on the wrong floor and went to where she thought her apartment was.

She didn't notice the bright red welcome mat, and when she tried her key it didn't fit (for obvious reasons), but she noticed that the door was unlocked. Rather than doing something sensible like looking around or calling for backup, she pulled her pistol and charged in.

The guy was startled and stood up. She got tunnel vision and the only thing that mattered was that a big, black dude was "coming at her," so she shot him. Only afterwards did she realize that she was in the wrong apartment.

She called 9-1-1 and said that she shot a guy by accident, and the responding cops did what cops always do when one of their own does something stupid: they tried to cover for her. They tossed the place looking for some reason to make him out to be the bad guy (they said that he had been smoking weed). They also failed to take her weapon, put her in handcuffs, or question her. They even let her roam around the crime scene looking for "evidence" as if she were responding to a call rather than being the reason for it.

On the stand she claimed that she ordered the guy to freeze, but every neighbor they called denied that. Not that it should matter anyway: 1) she had no authority to give such an order, and 2) she shot so fast that he wouldn't have had time to react, anyway. Her lawyers tried to use the "Castle Doctrine" on the grounds that Texas law allows you to use deadly force in defense of your home, but the judge said, "Lolnope," or words to that effect.

As I understand it, the jury had the option of manslaughter, negligent homicide, or murder. They convicted her of murder because she should have known she was in the wrong apartment.

Read More
3

Lone_Ranger

11 hours ago  The Public Square

@Typo-MAGAshiv I didn't say anything remotely resembling what he is implying.

1

Lone_Ranger

11 hours ago  The Public Square

@Typo-MAGAshiv or just go old school. The imagination is a wonderful thing! Got me through my teens.

I have read all about the no-fap challenge and all that - I suspect that its setting people up for failure. And then guilt, and then a vicious cycle.

Masturbation is not the problem, porn is the problem.

If you want to do something good for yourself - give up porn. You can still jerk off whenever you want, but only to your imagination. Worked for millions of men for thousands of years!

You'll soon find your libido settling down to a normal level, and you'll probably be thinking about normal healthy stuff.

1 4 fcks

TwoInchesOfShaft

11 hours ago  The Public Square

@Typo-MAGAshiv We can’t blame it solely on conditioning. The reality is that the conditioning and the female imperative play on biologically hardwired provider and protector instincts in men. The conditioning is not that strong, the embracing of only one part of the biological male role is. In an acute approach situation this is then exacerbated by another biologically entrained behavior: risk reduction. Approach anxiety leads to men embracing the role of the beta even more.

Most comments under these vids say “if I only had 1% of your confidence bro”. They relegate themselves to being mediocre. Can we change this on a large scale societal level? I say no. I was more idealistic a few years ago but I’ve been meeting many many people over the years from all levels of society besides super rich and there’s one thing that >90% of humans have in common: they are lazy. I myself have to fight every day to get something done after work (and it’s not as much as when I was a bit younger). Now add in addictive and laziness inducing factors like TikTok and porn and there’s no chance in hell >10% of men get their act together in a way that they are successful, competent and confident while also pushing their boundaries when it comes to fear of rejection or fear of failure in other endeavors. Those who do, do not act like the alpha at the end of the day, they actually are the alpha males. Those who strive in 3-5 major domains of male life for ten years outpace everyone who’s even remotely close to them by leaps and bounds. It is nice if you get it done, it’s a shame that it seems impossible for the vast majority of humans to even try to approach their potential.

Read More
4 32 fcks
Load More