"The Empress Is Naked"
adam-l

Did you know that the first Matrix was designed to be a perfect human world? Where none suffered, where everyone would be happy. It was a disaster. No one would accept the program. Entire crops were lost. Some believed we lacked the programming language to describe your perfect world. But I believe that, as a species, human beings define their reality through suffering and misery. The perfect world was a dream that your primitive cerebrum kept trying to wake up from.
- Agent Smith
It's one of the greatest tragedy of the hulan species, that it needs stress or enemies to feel alive...
@adam-l uh-huh....
Then what was your entire point here?
You wasted a lot of your time, my time, and the time of anyone following along by grasping at straws.
Hell, more like grasping at nothing, because your objection to my saying what I said was a nonsensical objection.
@Typo-MAGAshiv I have no clue about John Lennon other that he was Beatles and got himself and his group fucked by a borderline woman.
Probably was a borderline humself, as many top-tier artists.
I'm not in the habit of defending, or attacking for that matter, people. I'm more interested in social dynamics, i.e. laws and processes.
So basically I'm just arguing about the obvious, i.e. that you are closed to that perspective.
A) why didn't you lead with that, instead of wasting your time and mine with what you said instead, which made no sense?
B) of course I'm closed to communism. it's fucking stupid! it doesn't work, it never has worked, and it never will work. It will always collapse upon itself due to human nature.
Therein lies the value of utopias: they provide Insights
Fantasy worlds are just that: fantasy.
You are technically correct.
We've stumbled on a technical issue, that is. There is, of course, a moral dimension in sexual strategy. We've agreed, in TRP, not to engage in it, because it would bog down the discussion.
The thing is that politics doesn't lie on an abstract moral ground. It has practical implications, just as marrying the wrong woman. Maybe the arguments against capitalism are about those implications (i.e. war, "poverty" i.e. inability to live and reproduce etc), but the counter-arguments are wrapped in a moral coat, to anchor themselves in a moral outrage.
The philosophical -yet-very-pragmatic principle behind all this is that you have to stand outside a system in order to be able to see it clearly. Therein lies the value of utopias: they provide Insights. On the other hand, when TINA (There Is No Alternative), as Thatcher put it, every attrocity can be justified.
So, to get back at Lennon's case. It's not that you won't take his viewpoint because he was rich. You won't take Marx's viewpoint either, in spite of him being poor. So basically I'm just arguing about the obvious, i.e. that you are closed to that perspective.
Read MoreCalling out Lennon, or any of the others you mention, as a hypocrite, is a moral judgement.
Yes.
The "no moralizing" principle is supposed to hold for TheRedPill as a sexual strategy forum. It doesn't apply to worldwide politics, not only because politics is another issue altogether, but also because politics by its nature has morals at its epicenter.
Agreed.
So what is your issue with me calling those hypocritical pieces of shit what they are in that realm, while in the realm of pragmatic sexual strategy I advise men not to make the mistake I made?
Where is the issue?
So, again, you allow yourself the slack to make moral judgements, while denying it to others.
I made a moral judgement in an arena that, as you pointed out, inherently has morality involved.
while denying it to others.
I have never denied anyone else the ability to make moral judgments in politics. Show me where I have.
Read Morebabies need their mother available otherwise they become irritated and end up mentally sttessed individuals, etc
I mean, more importantly, babies also need to be fed!
@adam-l Spot on. Neoliberalism has added to the worker base, adding to the tax base and made most families dependent on the state. Its a virtuous circle for the liberals, everything they want win in this and those horrid 60's and 70's feminists who wanted to destroy the patriarchy by destroying the family rejoice.
Actually, in my experience, the hardest thing about being a sole bread winner is trying to convince your lady that you (and therefore she) are not failures because you can never afford a foreign holiday. It weighs heavy on them not keeping up with the hive.
30.6K Followers