@Typo-MAGAshiv I agree with you. We just need to convince the ladies...

I would also go so far as to say infidelity can never be abuse. It probably crosses the boundaries of what is OK in most relationships. That doesn't make it abuse. If you stay with an unfaithful person the only abuse is self abuse. You are continuing to hurt your self. Your partner is just doing what they like, they are not actually hurting you.

I have thought hard about this over the years. I once had a very beautiful girlfriend who was also a work colleague. I was totally in love with her and had taken her to meet my mother, took the best care of her, gave her the best presents, cooked for her every time she came round and such. I was a better boyfriend (better beta) than I have ever been before or since. I came to learn she was unfaithful. She denied it strenuously, we carried on with me knowing it was not what I wanted, gathering evidence and hoping I could change her (muppet) and being too weak to call a halt.

Then one day she gave me a Christmas present she had received from another lover (how I knew is a long story but it was later confirmed). This was beyond cuckoldry it was taking the piss. In a fit of rage I told my boss that the girl had been sleeping with her husband (which again I knew with 100% certainty). The boss' husband confessed and was forgiven. The girl was fired without references. It happened she was an immigrant and her visa was dependent on her job. She had to go home in shame. (I had not foreseen that). She asked me why I did it, why when she had never done a thing to hurt me and had only been good company. I said it was the lies that made me crazy.

In retrospect, I am grateful for my second and final red pill (needed a double dose I am afraid). But I think I think its a good illustration of how being with someone unfaithful is self abuse not abuse. She didn't actually ever hurt me, I did it to myself over her lies.

I checked my privilege. It said expired 1968. To get a privilege card these days I would need to have a protected characteristic in law but it was my fate to be born male, pale, heterosexual, able bodied and cisgendered. No privilege cards available for me these days.

One could argue that being an incel was a privilege. The incel does not get divorce raped, accused of sexual assault, does not have to catch mice and spiders on urgent demand or deal with plug holes blocked by long hair but I have never heard it called a privilege before. We all know that being accepted into woman's arms is the highest validation a man can receive, without which he is nothing.

Check out Womankind Worldwide. They are "nurturing the beating heart of feminist movements" Nurturing is a feminist concept. Nurturing is something only the strong can do and all women are strong.

As much as you are a strong woman who needs no man, I expect you would still appreciate a man who was supportive and caring, who could cook and fix things for you, who backed up your career and who was there for you when you were down, even if that day you had done nothing to earn it. These are the nurturing things men desire too.

Feminists know gender is only a social construct and so I advise you to look underneath the social construct of having a womb, different hormones and slightly different brain structure and you will find men have very similar needs to you. Someone who is there for them, backs them for better or worse and makes them their top priority is a huge attraction for men and women alike.

The fertility thing may be harder to deal with. The clinic may help but you will still have to convince millions of years of evolution to reconsider their view on youth being desirable as an indicator of fertility.

I can see past your knee jerk reaction to my low status masculinity and see that you are a wonderful accomplished woman. I invite you to try to similarly see past it and see that I might have a point. Some tings are so clear that even a low status male can grasp them.