btw she was 10y younger then her husband, cool, but someone didn't tell her that probably it is not the best idea
That's like half the of your situation in reverse.
I had 4 y older woman for a LLTR and it was a stretch
Yes there are differences in culture between myself and my girl but I'd take her 21yo ass over most girls closer to my age (30).
Culture difference don't mean much. It's her behavior patterns that matter and the fact I got.her at 19 means she has been corrupted by the bar scene.
@DonDripp not that green line faggotry again
she under influence of her son
btw she was 10y younger then her husband, cool, but someone didn't tell her that probably it is not the best idea, I had 4 y older woman for a LLTR and it was a stretch
www.lbc.co.uk/news/shakira-calls-barbie-film-emasculating-for-men/
How is barbi emasculating for boys?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=FodhvkfXJ1g
This can def triffer Russia; dangerous? Absolutely. What can people do to stop this? Vote por a peace candidate, leader of NATO.
Words and phrases I've confirmed get automatically shadowbanned in Youtube comments. Based on personal experience and in some cases by A+B testing intact and broken/disguised keywords like Is real Des. Troyed... Share yours.
I wonder if the availability of contraception has led to the decline in fertility? Wether that's a good thing or bad is up to discussion
I don’t dispute your assertion that a lot of people have inaccurate views of geopolitics in general and Russia’s role in particular. I certainly don’t consider myself to be an expert, and I’m better informed than 99+% of people. But look at who you specified as having that mindset:
1) the Executive Branch (hard left)
2) the MSM (hard left)
3) broad civilian public opinion (the kind of people who believe KJP and CNN)
It’s almost like there’s a pattern, while the people who oppose transferring our national budget and ammunition stores to Zelenskyy are from the other side of the political aisle.
As for the “No first use” policy, that came out of Cold War politics. While the Soviets claimed that they would not use nukes first, they did so when they had an overwhelming numerical advantage in all major conventional systems. Not only that, but nobody believed them. We knew good and well that if war broke out and they started to lose, they would go nuclear.
On the other hand, US / NATO doctrine explicitly called for using a “tripwire” of small, extremely lethal forces to bog down Soviet advances until forces could be brought to bear from CONUS. The only way a small force could prevent the Warsaw Pact from reaching the Rhine before an effective response could arrive was through closing canalizing terrain (specifically the Fulda Gap) with tactical nuclear weapons. That’s what REFORGER was all about: annual exercises to get conventional forces from North America to Europe before the war was already over and before the Russians turned Western Europe into a radioactive wasteland.
The fact that so many people ascribe some moral superiority to the Soviet / Russian public stance of “No first use” just shows how effective their propaganda was / is.
Read More
0.144