Discussion about the 5th gen war
@Typo-MAGAshiv There’s a long and uncertain road ahead, pathed with charlatans, turncoats and grifters.
In the end though, we win.
dude, that's some pretty in your face propaganda to just willfully absorb uncritically
Sorry, what is?
I don’t particularly care for the details of whoever assassinated Charlie Kirk, in as much as it wouldn’t change my opinion on the magnitude of the atrocity.
Though, given you feel it’s important and proves some kind of point about ‘sides’ that you feel you’re making I’m going to assume you’ve seen details contrary to what I’ve seen.
I’m not ashamed to admit that my reaction to Charlie Kirk’s murder is of horror and anger because he is of my in-group. I will advocate for my in-group specifically so that members do not get assassinated by the out-group. It’s a matter of objective reality and self-preservation- especially as the out-group increasingly appears to be emboldened to attack us.
Suppose this was a planned hit intended to provoke a civil war between average Americans? Allowing oneself to get provoked into joining it would be a most consequential Blue Pill, would it not?
Unless you can substantiate this, it’s not worth much.
Read More@Stigma dude, that's some pretty in your face propaganda to just willfully absorb uncritically.
Certain figures were pushing the "Violent Left did this " literally minutes after the news broke. That didn't surprise me, but what does is the sheer number of people still banging that same drum no matter how many details about the shooter emerge that flat out don't fit that narrative.
Suppose this was a planned hit intended to provoke a civil war between average Americans? Allowing oneself to get provoked into joining it would be a most consequential Blue Pill, would it not?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=_czBvLB-DwY
I've not said anything over the weekend, because the death of Charlie Kirk rattled me in a way I didn't expect. The footage of his murder was visceral. Words failed me.
Words did not fail the "people" that hated Charlie Kirk.
Sam Hyde has verbalised my anger, better than I am able.
1
2
What's going on?
Unless something happens to interrupt and redirect society, these trends are going to lead to a complete centralization of power and zero ability to negotiate from normal everyday people. This will necessarily be followed by global *"enshittification" and a massive drop in human QoL.
The UK government is already using the OSA to aggressively demand the identities of Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia lost the case.
I wrote the post to raise awareness which I urge others to do. If you want to read more, check out my bio.
Only cowards and fools would conflate wickedness for niavity. Time, trial, and challenge will reveal which the video author can be considered soon enough.
These trends lead towards an IoT (Internet of Things) enabled lifestyle where neither the home nor the devices actually belong to the user — you will own nothing and will be happy with a LaaS (Life-as-a-Service) lifestyle
I don't have an answer for you, but I wanted to chime in that I chime l absolutely hate that.
I want to modify my things, my way.
@MentORPHEUS No, his phraseology is apt for the point he's wishing to make. Marx espouses the state owning the means of production. The means of production owning individuals could be said to be a "reverse-engineering" of Marx. At least that's what I think he meant.