My favorite names for our Dem Candidate:
- Hindu Nuffin
- Que Mala
- Cum Allah
- Cackling Kamala
- Kamala the Chameleon
- Obamala Harris
- Michelle Light
My favorite names for our Dem Candidate:
@Typo-MAGAshiv I can guarantee that he didn't say shit to his wife and just stopped fucking. Then they had the conversation after she was upset.
@Musicgoon78 Jesus. I had thought these retards were just lazy do-nothings trying to cope with not getting laid. I wouldn't have guessed that someone who fucks would engage in this retardation.
I can just imagine the conversation, too...
hey babe, we can't have sex until further notice. Some guys on the internet said that if I retain my semen, I'll unlock all kinds of powers.
Hay guise, muh wife is angri at me. I stopped banging her and now she is angry all the time and there's no intimacy. Why is dis?
@woodsmoke Late as usual to the convo. You are right on the money. Posts like these are good enough for a conversation in the tribes, but they cannot be permitted in the forums because they do not fit the theme and are going to be bad optics even if it is carefully presented. Discussions are fine, showcasing them is not.
You have been banned from r/femaledatingstrategy
I refer to women like her as "Bum magnets". Because they are repelled by decent men. And they become repellent to decent men too.
As you know, I am much more open to "adjacent" content than most. As long as it highlights some key aspect of the WAATGM phenomenon, I'm good with it.
But this one should not be published because of the reasons previously mentioned:
BUT... it does have value as it does reinforce or hint at a few of our favorite topics/flairs, including:
It's a great story, if true. But I vote no. We can allude to this story as needed in the future. So it can serve a purpose. I would just not let it fly for all the aforementioned reasons.
Still one hell of a compelling story.
Important Note:
This discussion brings up our ongoing moderation challenge here; Censorship.
Over the years, I have yanked many a post on /r/waatgm and a few other subs that I modded, for the optics alone - even when everything else fit. And I think we should all be mindful of straddling that fine line between being open in our speech on one hand, and opening ourselves up to claims of racism, ableism, etc.
Instead of looking at it as censorship, we do something more akin to self- policing. Is this a subtle semantic difference? Sure. But we all get what that means.
CC: @deeplydisturbed, @houseoftolstoy, @Impressive-Cricket-8, @Land_of_the_losers, @lurkerhasarisen, @moorekom, @MelkorHimself, @ogrilla99, @woodsmoke
Read More