@First-light performativity is all they can perceive. You do... something, and... something happens.
Isn't it magic?
1
2
@First-light performativity is all they can perceive. You do... something, and... something happens.
Isn't it magic?
"Women are children" is an affront to children. Children have the capacity to evolve.
@adam-l Good point about it being a short term strategy, one consistently employed in other areas. Look at the national debt in the U.S. and UK. These people are enriching themselves now while saying to hell with future generations. If some calamity strikes in 25 years, countries won't have the flexibility to deal with it via issuance of debt. Leaders used to care about such things.
Yes, that's the rationale, but on a more fundamental level it unravels the population's sense of belonging and their motivation. It's a psychopathic, greedy, fast, short term strategy, a phase that we can probably identify in the collapse of all the empires of the past.
@adam-l It's rational. Rational egoism. If lower class women aren't reproducing, they are in the work force putting downward pressure on wages. Because the desire for downward pressure on wages is insatiable, immigrants are imported. This has the additional benefit, to the elites, of dividing the population and making it easier to control.
@Typo-MAGAshiv It's all connected, though. The elite are destroying the capacity of their own lower classes to reproduce, not because it's a rational thing, but because opposition to them has vanished (and the single biggest reason is that they managed to turn the Left from a working class orientation to "rights of the minorities" and gender issues) - and they are bringing in immigrants as a precarious underclass to take the lower tier jobs. It's a recipe for disaster.
@adam-l one problem at a time
First, the UK and the rest of Western Civilization needs to expel Muslims, whose religious writings teach that it's OK to treat non-Muslims that way.
After that, we can address those other issues. Those can't be fixed while the invaders are raping, pillaging, burning, destroying, etc.
@Bozza from a first look, and to be a devil's advocate, it's notable that so many white young girls were so disadvantaged in the first place, that they would so easily fall victims to such treatment.
Does the report count how many of them were daughters of single mothers?
It seems to me that countering the muslim network of exploitation is still symptomatic treatment. My intuition is that for many of those girls, if it wasn't attention from members of the network, it would be self-cutting, drugs or some other form of self-destructing diversion to save them from a psychotic decomposition.
In the UK the institution of the family is significantly eroded, and cheating rates are astronomical. If these problems were addressed, there would be no ground for the gang rape epidemic to happen in the first place. And conversely, as long as these systemic problems are not addressed, there will always be perverted ways of dealing with the existential dread caused by the lack of a strong paternal presence.
Read MoreThey are actors. They serve whatever role they are served. This "strong independent woman" trope is orchestrated from above...
What's frustrating for me it the soullessness of it all. Yeah, women take the form of their container, but the current mainstream has focused so singularly on their worst possible traits, their drive to antagonize the man, that has eclipsed any good qualities of the female.
@adam-l women have been way too indulged in so many ways across soyciety over the decades, but the Hollywoo portrayals of them kicking men's asses (such as Scarlett Johansson beating the crap out of multiple men) just takes their delusions to new levels
I take it she's one of those? Who thinks she is better than any man in every possible way, to include believing she'd actually win a fight with a man?