Carousel rider with a 37 body count wants to settle down and is frustrated that men don't want to commit to the town bicycle. (post by @houseoftolstoy)
I will not argue that Russia and China are the "good guys" or will make things great. But they are a bulwark against the globohomo agenda being pushed by the US and other western countries.
For those invested in this kind of dipshit take on the situation while NOT paying attention to China's active military threats against the US and their new alliance with Russia buying massive gold and planning a new currency that lots of countries are jumping on board with.
You may soon discover the hard way that homogenizing the culture toward a centralized ideal of conservatism will wipe out YOUR ideals and way of life along with "the libs and fags."
@Desaint I will not argue that Russia and China are the "good guys" or will make things great. But they are a bulwark against the globohomo agenda being pushed by the US and other western countries. If they can oppose that, they are serving a good purpose in that sense, even if not for the reasons I would want them to be.
I don't think the US will get a full on invasion of our country. In the event that Russia and/or China were to do so, I cannot say I would feel roused to want to stop them.
Just what would I be fighting for? A corrupt system of government that lies to me and seeks to eradicate more of my freedom?
The idea of America is great. But we are far from living in that actual idea. All we have are empty promises towards that idea from those who are deliberately working against that idea.
@Typo-MAGAshiv That makes perfect sense. If you are already buying one thing, you are likely to buy other things too, since making two trips is less efficient than making one.
This reminds me of something, when there were shortages in products like baby formula, Walmart was always the place where the shortages were worst. My observation is that everyone wants the best deal possible, so they will go where the products are generally cheaper. But when there are shortages, the products predictably dissappear from places like Walmart first. This in effect makes it worst for those with lower income, because they are most likely to solely shop at Walmart due to the low prices.
I see where you're coming from, and the fact that she has IG may be a yellow flag (I've never had it, but I don't want to be one of those old geezers who thinks any social media activity is a disqualifier). But it seems to me that we're hanging this particular narrative on a pretty thin reed. I'll admit that the church girl may be influencing my thoughts.
I say that because we went to the same church for a long time, and she was the real deal. She was exactly the kind of woman I would have made a full-court press for when I was single.
I also understand that we're issuing warnings about what can (and often does) happen to guys who fall for chameleons, and I agree that nobody owes anyone a chance. Buuuuuut...
One of the things that separates us from incel and inspin fora is that we don't engage in criticism of a member of the opposite sex no matter what. We have always required the women to "tell on themselves" (for lack of a better term). That's the entire point of Rule 5. If a woman makes a dating profile wherein she's dressed modestly and isn't a raging bitch or an obvious cc-rider, and we peg her as a chameleon who's going to go feral once the alimony is locked in, we should base that on something more than the fact that she has a social media account and expresses a bit of frustration about meeting men who don't follow hundreds of e-sluts. That's honestly a pretty basic request in those circles.
Granted, her age puts her in the "secondary" market for women who want to be TradWives, and that's a legitimate yellow flag, but it's hardly definitive. If we create unfalsifiable assumptions that amount to, "If she breathes she's a THOT," we deserve to be compared to bitter incels.
That's why I suggested some sort of consensus on how much evidence of thottery is enough. I'm not suggesting a courtroom standard for a criminal conviction, but before we showcase a woman as an example of someone to be avoided we should be able to articulate why we say that... and if we're not going to require that a woman "tell on herself" we should be able to clearly and convincingly articulate why we think she falls into that category.
Oh well, the worm-can is open... might as well loop everyone in:
@loneliness-inc, @deeplydisturbed, @melkorhimself, @impressive-cricket-8, @goodmansaysfuckyou, @houseoftolstoy, @aldabruzzo, @Land_of_the_losers, @ogrilla99, @sleepyweaselisawake, @woodsmoke
Read More@moorekom I vote "tradthot chameleon" because I think we need to emphasize their deceptive nature, and the term "tradthot" on its own has become a bit watered down.
I'm abandoning my like of "tradthot trap" for the reason @houseoftolstoy said, and I'm blaming RL stress and fatigue for my not having thought of that sooner lol
@moorekom My vote is #1 tradthot. It is both familiar and succinct to what we are trying to convey. I agree that #2 is just repetition. #3 might be confusing (tradtrap might imply a trap of a different kind), and I don't think it quite describes the type of woman we are referring to anyways. Sure, such a woman may indeed reveal herself to be not trad at all and enact a plan to screw over a man, but often such women are looking to hide their past as much as they think they can get away with it.
Why the fuck didn't you post that at the WAATGM forum?! Mega bailout and entitlement princess!
Tag: @moorekom, @Kevin32, @lurkerhasarisen, @houseoftolstoy, @woodsmoke you all should bust his balls for this too!
Hell, @goodmansaysfuckyou, if you come out of your coma anytime soon, I hope you pile on as well!
The clips for that channel are the best bang for the buck, as the whole livestream is just the same pattern
Oh, for sure. I don't have the time or patience to sit through multi-hour videos/livestreams/podcasts, especially when much of the time is taken up by hobags jabbering. I've only finished 2 of his, and they were both 1 on 1 interviews with men (one was Warren Farrell, and the other was with that Marine Veteran who beat the false rape charge at Columbia University). Hell, I rarely finish any of Rollo's long-ass videos or Rule Zero ones either.
[exceptions vs generalities]
That's how women always try to argue against generalities. Roissy/Heartiste dealt with that in his comment section way back in the day, and I see it everywhere.
I mean, my wife and I are exceptions to a lot of things, but I recognize the generalities to be generally (duh) true. Women have this weird blind spot due to solipsism and emotionalism.
Read More