@Stigma The bolded statements are not inconsistent, much less palpable untruths.
President Trump has repeatedly denied any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes and has said that he cut off contact with his former friend more than 20 years ago.
...
told the FBI he had received a call from Donald Trump at the time to say "thank goodness you’re stopping him, everyone has known he’s been doing this,"
Okay, so which lie do we believe this time? Oh yes, of course, the one that makes him look good!
“TRUMP told him people in New York knew EPSTEIN was disgusting. TRUMP said MAXWELL was EPSTEIN's operative, ‘she is evil and to focus on her,’ the report continues. “TRUMP told [Reiter] that he was around EPSTEIN once when teenagers were present and TRUMP ‘got the hell out of there.' TRUMP was one of the very first people to call when people found out that they were investigating EPSTEIN,” the report of Reiter’s statement said.
You're suddenly disinterested in empirical evidence and someones testimony is enough to make objective claims.
So, just more partisan hot air. Gotcha.
Read More@Stigma We are having some issues today. might not be you
I just got that site issue again. I don't know if it's my side or not. DNS probe failed, mobile and desktop. Turned on VPN, loaded site, disconnected from VPN - issue solved. \o/ Wot
@Stigma this is why I hate that part of our content policy; that and at WAATGM, a woman's looks matter very much relative to what she's demanding of men.
But here we are. Sometimes we have to adapt to the world as it is, rather than how we wish it were...
@Lone_Ranger You can see the mongoloid in her physiognomy; low stock, cattle, moves with the herd. Expendable. And yet, these things being patently obvious, her vote still counts for the same as yours and mine...
@MentORPHEUS Let’s be fair, some of the pages mentioning Trump were deleted before the poor rascals could get a good look at them.
Of course, they don’t wonder why. That’s an issue, I suppose.
[first two paragraphs]
If you haven't found anything, just fucking be honest (for a change) and say so.
[remainder]
You either completely misunderstand everything I've said in this thread, or you're deliberately lying and misrepresenting everything I've said in this thread.
You may have missed my reply to @stigma, but I'll reiterate:
If it becomes evident that Trump participated in those crimes, I'll be calling for his impeachment, removal from office, and imprisonment.
However, so far as I've seen up to now, any mentions of him fit what I've previously said.
You just so desperately want him gone, that you're willing to believe anything sans evidence just because "Orange Man bad".
@Stigma oh cut the high-and-mighty "I'm a seeker of truth" and "I'm not partisan" bullshit.
Read back through what you said in this thread (and the others on the topic).
You've somehow convinced yourself that Trump is among the perpetrators, and have completely ignored all the factual rebuttals that @seasonedRP and I have provided.
Here we go again:
1) if evidence Trump had done anything illegal actually existed, the democrats would have used it against him while the impostor was in the White House. They pulled out all the stops to keep Trump from running again, including fictional-ass mortgage fraud charges, brought forward by a DA who was herself committing mortgage fraud. If they had something real, they'd have used it.
2) every mention of Trump falls into one of the following categories:
-
Epstein and/or associats trying to figure out how to "get" Trump and/or admitting they have nothing on him
-
victims and victims' lawyers saying that Trump helped them
- non-credible "tips" from non-credible sources during elections
If it turns out that Trump actually did any of the things that we now know that Epstein, Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, or others have done, I'll be among those calling for his impeachment, removal, and imprisonment.
But it won't happen, because if he had, we'd already know.
Read More
