2h ago  The Public Square

Why not both.

1
2h ago  The Public Square
Moderator

@Typo-MAGAshiv

1) yes 2) yes

2
2h ago  The Public Square
@Butthead

@Goingthedistance

And somehow that's my problem now!

No clue what you meant by that

1
2h ago  The Public Square
@Butthead

@Vermillion-Rx

1) was that all there was to that post?

2) was the user banned for the rule that says "do not announce that you are a woman" etc?

1 1
2h ago  The Public Square
Moderator

@Goingthedistance

I've yet to watch his videos in full but of what I've seen and what people have posted from him i am seriously unimpressed. Part of it borrows from RP and the other part of just poorly explained gymnastics

Keep seeing his owner viewers on our sub get confused

2h ago  The Public Square
1
2h ago  The Public Square

@Typo-MAGAshiv If he is, then he came into that money by selling his courses. All type of coaches especially dating and social stuff that try to sell you stuff like courses are big red flags imho.

1
2h ago  The Public Square

@Vermillion-Rx Being rich shouldn't matter in his case as that's what he's preaching. I watched one of his videos that basically said you can be the best you can be but if some guy washing cars has game he can seduce your LTR and basically nullify your existence and SMV. I called mad doubts on that and stopped watching.

From all his videos, not once did he say the best advice I ever got on here "learn to let go and enjoy your life now" which makes you more attractive than being a hyperfocused sperg concerned on "Getting it".

1 2
2h ago  The Public Square

@MentORPHEUS Nothing a small bribe here and there cannot fix.

4h ago  The Public Square

@Victor Read the book years ago, saw the first series years ago, decided not to watch this one because it was billed as having a strong independent female warrior in it and I am just sick to death of history being re-written to fit an agenda, even in fiction.

So, not knowing the context I would say that in politics a man who is ambitious himself can only see an ally who is ambitious as a rival. It happens quite a lot even these days. Two ambitious young politicians team up but in the end one stabs the other in the back to get to high office or one promises the other to help him later if he gets the top job first and then usually does not follow through.

It was much more common, however, when war could elevate a man. The possibilities for sudden betrayal were many. You had Stanley turning up for the crucial battle of the war of the roses and deciding to switch sides. You had Pompey Caesar and Crassus taking over Rome only to then fight each other.

Miyamoto Musashi was definitely an interesting guy. Very much a product of his time -of toxic rivalries between schools of swordsmen but clearly a guy with a huge range of talent -have you seen some of his art? His tactic of turning up late for duels is a good one that I have used myself on occasion -though not for more than duels of words. If the opposition turns up early all wired and ready to go and then you arrive annoyingly late and fresh, it can really put them off. However this does go right against "Traveller's" advice for duellists -be there first dominate the ground, intimidate the opposition by being cools and purposeful when they arrive. Probably a case of different cultures.

Read More
2
Load More