I've been working on it for a few years, so here's the big announcement:
I'm a psychologist
I got my degree and I'll be giving consultations.
I'll offer a few sessions in exchange for donations to TRP.RED. A chance for members here to sort out some things, while supporting the platform.
PM me for details.
2I don't have PUA background but I see more of difference from 6 to 7 or 8 to 9 than 7 to 8.
7 ans 8 are the attractive side of normal and the normal side of attractive.
I spent most of my life hovering around 6.5 and had plenty of IoIs just by basically sitting there "looking mysterious."
Bro, stop harshing my mellow maaaan.
Man, my favorite is still PON take that the scale should be 1-30.
His main argument was a majority of men tend to over-rate women Plus it allows for more variety and some over lap.
A 7 doesn't necessarily become a 21 because his categories were untouchable 1-9, normal women 11-19, and super model/celebrity hot. That 7 would likely be a 16-18 when you look at the entire scope of women.
My biggest life experience that really opened my eyes to this concept was moving from a college town of 120k to LA.
The 8s around here would barely pass as 6s out there. Even in Portland and Seattle vs a Midwest university town with fresh batches of 18yos ever August, there was just that many more, physically more attractive women.
At the end of the day any scale is just an arbitrary tool for guy talk. All that really matters is do you find her attractive enough or not: binary.
Read More@Bozza Yes feminism and liberalism are luxuries that are only affordable by great prosperity.
Been watching a bunch of US bodycam videos on YouTube recently.
We get Police shows here in the UK but they're fairly mild.
The US ones though are fucking crazy. You guys put crack in the water in the US or something?
