I always thought overthrowing that government in 1953 was a mistake
@Vermillion-Rx That power fire feeder brought to mind the lead up to the 1979 Iranian US embassy takeover and hostage crisis.
Anticipating the embassy getting overrun, the diplomats attempted to destroy sensitive and incriminating documents. First they overstuffed a furnace to the point of incapacitation. Then, they turned to paper shredders and ran those till they broke.
The Iranians employed skilled rug weavers to painstakingly reassemble the shredded Documents. Then, they published all of them under the title Documents from the American spy den that ran 25 volumes.
I was in middle school at the time, and bought into the mainstream Iranians Evil viewpoint
It was a big political Red Pill to later learn the full context, how America overthrew the Iranian Government in 1953, and installed the Shah to help brutally oppress the population to facilitate stealing the nation's petroleum wealth. Also, the detail about the Reagan campaign secretly negotiating to keep the hostages captive while Jimmy Carter remained in office.
Read More@Bangkok what on God's green earth are you even trying to say?!?!
I had a variation of
were not having sex tonight
I'm not going to be pimping girls for you
I let it settle for 1day and sent a message in replay to some regular text
pimp
Getting funny pimp vid in reply doesn't settle the outcome ofcourse
Reminded me of the rule anyway.
@Vermillion-Rx Wow, the balls on that woman! And, the deep voice, and distinctly male countenance
Into the resume fire, with they/them!!
@adam-l lion is a great exaple, it could be like this if men would apply generally warrior strategies, or watch situational alphas getting crushed and not do what they did
Or maybe not, maybe even 0.01% simps worldwide would destroy sexual market by giving free attention to any female that can be reached on the web.
I'm going to hell for laughing at this
Which of you guys am I going to see down there?
I could never deal with HR again, fuck those Karens
x.com/chakravartiiin/status/2096470611367440698
There are key moments where your failure to perform can mean she loses all respect and attraction. But I'm not sure how much actual performance counts (beyond having your basic shit together).
A top predator like the lion is, I believe, illustrating. The lioness is happy to do most of the hunting (chores), as long as she's sure she is with the apex male.
Otto Weininger has an example from some Native American tribe, where women would laugh at a fellow woman if they saw her man gathering wood, a female chore. Weininger, being autistic, interprets it as women being tricked into taking up work. He completely misses the point. For women specifically, symbolic status is a visible, tangible thing. They can spend decades, or in fact a lifetime, content in the periphery of a man who exhudes high status, even if it means she needs to take up the bulk of the work.
I'm not claiming this is "normal" or effective, of course. Many women end up destroying themselves and their children because of that tendency of them, because, unless you are dirty rich, your doing stuff matters in the real world.
Women's evolutionary preference for the alpha ape overrides reality, though.
In practice, they are quick to discredit your actual peeformance (Briffault's law). They see things through their fantasy lens.
Read More