The Evolutionary Psychology Behind Politics: How Conservatism and Liberalism Evolved Within Humans

Why do people adopt different political ideologies? How can seemingly equal intellects, presented with the same facts and circumstances disagree so vehemently over how society should be structured? What psychological undercurrents guide people to adopt Conservative or Liberal political beliefs, and where did they come from?

The answer lies in a well known concept in biology, termed r/K Selection Theory. r/K Theory examines how all populations tend to adopt one of two psychologies as a means of adapting their behavior to the presence or absence of environmental resources. The two strategies, termed r and K, each correlate perfectly with the psychologies underlying Liberalism and Conservatism.

One strategy, named the r-strategy, imbues those who are programmed with it to be averse to all peer on peer competition, embrace promiscuity, embrace single parenting, and support early onset sexual activity in youth. Obviously, this mirrors the Liberal philosophy’s aversion to individual Darwinian competitions such as capitalism and self defense with firearms, as well as group competitions such as war. Likewise, Liberalism is tolerant of promiscuity, tolerant of single parenting, and more prone to support early sex education for children and the sexualization of cultural influences. Designed to exploit a plethora of resources, one will often find this r-type strategy embodied within prey species, where predation has lowered the population’s numbers, and thereby increased the resources available to it’s individuals.

The other strategy, termed the K-strategy, imbues those who pursue it with a fierce competitiveness, as well as tendencies towards abstinence until monogamy, two-parent parenting, and delaying sexual activity until later in life. Obviously, this mirrors Conservatism’s acceptance of all sorts of competitive social schemes, from free market capitalism, to war, to individuals owning and carrying private weapons for self defense. Conservatives also tend to favor abstinence until monogamy, two parent parenting with an emphasis upon “family values,” and children being shielded from any sexualized stimuli until later in life. This strategy is found most commonly in species which lack predation, and whose population’s have grown to the point individuals must compete with each other for the limited environmental resources that they are rapidly running out of.

Meticulously substantiated with the latest research in fields from neurobiology to human behavioral ecology, this work offers an unprecedented view into not just what governs our political battles, but why these battles have arisen within our species in the first place. From showing how these two strategies adapt in other more complex species in nature, to examining what genetic and neurostructural mechanisms may produce these divergences between individuals, to showing what this theory indicates our future may hold, this work is the most thorough analysis to date of just why we have two political ideologies, why they will never agree, and why we will tend to become even more partisan in the future.

You can find mention of this book on both Youtube, Scribd, and other websites including your preferred pirate media site.

#2017 #TheEvolutionaryPsychologyBehindPolitics #AnonymousConservative #Books #eBooks #Faith #Christianity #World #US #America #Kselection #Good #VS #Evil #rselection #CultureWar #EconomicWar #PsychologicalWarfare #SpiritualWarfare #BiologicalWarfare #BureaucraticWarfare #KineticWarfare #UnrestrictedWarfare #Demoralization #IdeologicalSubversion #Promiscuity #Predditors #Grooming #Homosexuality #SamesexAttracted #Sodomites #Pedophiles #Noncery #Pederasty #Pedophocracy #GenderDysphoria #PopulationControl #Politics #Rightism #Leftism #Conservative #Labour #Liberal #Libertarian #RepublicanParty #DemocraticParty #Uniparty #DualParty #Ideology #Egalitarianism #Atheism #Tribalism #Nationalism #Populism #Marxism #Feminism #Socialism #Fascism #Zionism #Internationalism #Communism #Humanism #Globohomo #Globalism #Paganism #Freemasonry #RabbinicalJudaism #Judeochristianity #Satanism #MentalIllness #MoralIllness

As we all know, the climate change fad is getting more extreme by the day. We're already at the level that we (read: White people, and White people only) are expected to suffer for the environment: Taxes on anything deemed harmful are exploding. Packages are being replaced by environmentally friendly ones that work like shit. We are expected to shower less. We are expected to get solar panels. And, most importantly for now: We are expected to give up on meat. On a daily basis, (((the media))) is trying to convince you that you don't need much meat, or even that it's bad for you. They tell you that meat is bad for the environment, due to methane, due to the water needed for the animals, etc. They tell you we should be sad for the animals, that we should be compassionate, like a good subservient goy.

Here's a fact they won't tell you though. The prehistoric hunter-gatherers that lived in Europe (the Gravettians) were over six feet tall on average. This number radically dropped when humans shifted from a meat-centered diet to staple food, and has only caught up in the last hundred-or-so years. Biologically speaking, it is only obvious: the human species are hunters by nature, hence we eat lots of meat. It is utterly ridiculous to believe, then, that the optimal amount of meat is like half an ounce a day, as they try and convince you.

Eat meat. Eat a lot of it. (And lift, while you're at it.) Give your children lots of meat, too. Do your part in making the next White generation stronger than ever before.

While in the train I overheard a couple of women talking about parenting. None of them had kids, and none of them seemed willing to have them in the future. They were discussing about how much of a burden it would be to have children. The amount of sleep you lose thanks to a child. How parents are always less happy than childfree people. That a human is physically unable to raise more than two children at once --- literally, in the sense that there wouldn't be enough hours in a day. One of them commented that, if you choose to have kids, it's best to just adopt them because why add another child to the world if there's already children without parents? Another one added that there are too many people on the planet anyway. It goes without saying that they were White.

What surprised me was not what they said --- rather, I was surprised by my lack of surprise. I realized I heard this exact sentiment countless of times. The general consensus nowadays is that children are a massive burden, and that you're better off not having them. Being a mother is being viewed as a bad thing, and being a stay-at-home mother is even considered some kind of punishment. We're at a point where the feminist indoctrination has seeped so deeply into our society that most people don't even notice there's something off.

No White kids means no future for White civilisation. It's that simple, fellas.