Welp, it had to happen eventually. Somebody will want to talk politics so here it is. This is specifically for US Politics.
I will make rules as I see the need but fro now please just be kind to each other.
Not so fun fact: The name Trump appears more often in the Epstein Files...
...than the name Jesus appears in the Bible!
A) I notice you start a new thread with this garbage-ass fact rather than reply to the threat in which I've already rebutted this "he's mentioned!" crap. Here it is for anyone interested. Be sure to read further on in that thread.
B) so what? Jesus is only mentioned in the New Testament, and the Old Testament is more than twice the size.
This garbage-ass fact shows your ignorance on multiple subjects: Trump and the Epstein files, the Bible, and context of any sorts and why context matters.
It takes a trivial amount of time to sift through what you hand wave as trivial or incidental mentions of his name, to get to a quite non-trivial number of unambiguously damning Trump references in the Epstein Files.
Oh really? Well then you should have no trouble actually showing me some.
So far all I've seen is what I've already said:
1) Epstein and cohorts trying to "get" Trump, but admitting they have nothing
2) non-credible tips from non-credible people during elections
3) victims and their lawyers saying that Trump helped them.
So show me some of these supposed "unambiguously damning Trump references in the Epstein Files" that it supposedly takes "a trivial amount of time" to find.
Read MoreMy facetious crossing out of his myriad excuses points at a man not entirely comfortable with the files. Why? Everyone should want to know the answer to that - and any indication otherwise or declaration of innocence is partisan and suspect as hell.
I'll admit that I was starting to get pissed off at the time, but did you notice that after campaigning on releasing them, he waited until his political opponents were screaming and demanding they be released before he released them? It's because if he tried to do it in a straightforward manner, everyone connected to the Clintons, Bill Gates, etc would have tried to stymie and block the release. Instead, he baited them into being in favor of it.
He played his opponents like a fiddle, and now they look like retards when they shriek about "but he's mentioooooned!" without accounting for the context.
Read More@Stigma I'll have to save this and other video recommendations for the weekend
@MentORPHEUS Come on already man get with the program... which is uh... they aren't real they're a dem hoax they exonerate him they're all released Umm.. shit, which one are we going with again?
@Bozza @MENTorpheus @typo-magashiv
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDfDWDTIg0E
Worth watching, in my opinion
Not so fun fact: The name Trump appears more often in the Epstein Files...
...than the name Jesus appears in the Bible!
@Typo: It takes a trivial amount of time to sift through what you hand wave as trivial or incidental mentions of his name, to get to a quite non-trivial number of unambiguously damning Trump references in the Epstein Files.
@Stigma @MentORPHEUS To be an impartial person
Being referenced or mentioned in the files isn't indication of a crime. Nor are FBI call ins withot backing evidence.
@Typo-MAGA-Shiv is right in this
But if there is evidence of wrongdoing (which I suspect there was) in the files I'd like to see it
Being referenced or mentioned in the files isn't indication of a crime. Nor are FBI call ins withot backing evidence.
I mostly agree, if this were in a vacuum. My facetious crossing out of his myriad excuses points at a man not entirely comfortable with the files. Why? Everyone should want to know the answer to that - and any indication otherwise or declaration of innocence is partisan and suspect as hell.
This puzzle won't be solved without all of the pieces. You get in the way of those pieces, you're a suspect. That's where I'm at.