So, Gilligan is a big fish in feminist theory, so much so that they gave her a Harvard seat. I'm checking out her work on female morality.

She sure sets the tone early, twisting Kant's view in her second page. Kant proposed that there are innate notions through which humans perceive the world, such as space and time. Gilligan asserts that Kant said otherwise, that time and space "all arise out of the active interchange" between individual and world.

She's either a moron or crazy. Probably both. Definitely a con.

We are witnessing a concerted process of social engineering, by capitalism (or post-capitalism), that utilises a runaway social constructionist ideology in order to turn everyone into, basically, their bitches. Into an extreme submissive position.

Feminist "scholars" are at the forefront of that project.

youtu.be/cE6wxDqdOV0?si=V3tARF4p8EdaKATe

Stumbled upon this little gem the other day. I've heard her name before, but thought it was just your run-of-the-mill, generic, pop for little girls.

But damn, this hit me right in the feelz! It's really something out of the ordinary.

Apart from being musically well composed and produced, it's also lyrically interesting, and surprisingly honest - from a (female) red pill perspective:

Obviously, all female love songs - whether happy or sad - will deal with "hypergamy" in some way. But this one takes it a bit further, and even (quite brazenly) deals with red pill concepts like "aloofness", and "pre approval".

I found out later that this song has actually received some criticism for being "anti-feminist". Don't know about that - it's certainly vague enough that you can interpret which ever way you like. But it certainly can be seen as having an every-day sort of submissive theme to it.